IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/japsta/v30y2003i9p1055-1078.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Statistical quality control based on ranked set sampling

Author

Listed:
  • Hassen Muttlak
  • Walid Al-Sabah

Abstract

Different quality control charts for the sample mean are developed using ranked set sampling (RSS), and two of its modifications, namely median ranked set sampling (MRSS) and extreme ranked set sampling (ERSS). These new charts are compared to the usual control charts based on simple random sampling (SRS) data. The charts based on RSS or one of its modifications are shown to have smaller average run length (ARL) than the classical chart when there is a sustained shift in the process mean. The MRSS and ERSS methods are compared with RSS and SRS data, it turns out that MRSS dominates all other methods in terms of the out-of-control ARL performance. Real data are collected using the RSS, MRSS, and ERSS in cases of perfect and imperfect ranking. These data sets are used to construct the corresponding control charts. These charts are compared to usual SRS chart. Throughout this study we are assuming that the underlying distribution is normal. A check of the normality for our example data set indicated that the normality assumption is reasonable.

Suggested Citation

  • Hassen Muttlak & Walid Al-Sabah, 2003. "Statistical quality control based on ranked set sampling," Journal of Applied Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 30(9), pages 1055-1078.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:japsta:v:30:y:2003:i:9:p:1055-1078
    DOI: 10.1080/0266476032000076173
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/0266476032000076173
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/0266476032000076173?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sinha Bimal K. & Sinha Bikas K. & Purkayastha Sumitra, 1996. "On Some Aspects Of Ranked Set Sampling For Estimation Of Normal And Exponential Parameters," Statistics & Risk Modeling, De Gruyter, vol. 14(3), pages 223-240, March.
    2. Lynne Stokes, 1995. "Parametric ranked set sampling," Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Springer;The Institute of Statistical Mathematics, vol. 47(3), pages 465-482, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Razmkhah Mansooreh & Sadeghpour Gildeh Bahram & Ahmadi Jafar, 2017. "An Economic Design of Rectifying Double Acceptance Sampling Plans via Maxima Nomination Sampling," Stochastics and Quality Control, De Gruyter, vol. 32(2), pages 99-104, December.
    2. Muhammad Abid & Hafiz Zafar Nazir & Muhammad Tahir & Muhammad Riaz, 2018. "On designing a new cumulative sum Wilcoxon signed rank chart for monitoring process location," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(4), pages 1-18, April.
    3. Al-Omari Amer Ibrahim & Al-Nasser Amjad D., 2011. "Statistical Quality Control Limits for the Sample Mean Chart Using Robust Extreme Ranked Set Sampling," Stochastics and Quality Control, De Gruyter, vol. 26(1), pages 73-89, January.
    4. Abdul Haq & Amer Al-Omari, 2015. "A new Shewhart control chart for monitoring process mean based on partially ordered judgment subset sampling," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 49(3), pages 1185-1202, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Barabesi, Lucio & El-Sharaawi, Abdel, 2001. "The efficiency of ranked set sampling for parameter estimation," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 53(2), pages 189-199, June.
    2. Raqab, Mohammad Z. & Kouider, Elies & Al-Shboul, Qasim M., 2002. "Best linear invariant estimators using ranked set sampling procedure: comparative study," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 39(1), pages 97-105, March.
    3. Wenshu Qian & Wangxue Chen & Xiaofang He, 2021. "Parameter estimation for the Pareto distribution based on ranked set sampling," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 62(1), pages 395-417, February.
    4. Vic Barnett & Maria Cecilia Mendes Barreto, 2001. "Estimators for a Poisson parameter using ranked set sampling," Journal of Applied Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(8), pages 929-941.
    5. Gang Zheng & Mohammad Al-Saleh, 2003. "Improving the best linear unbiased estimator for the scale parameter of symmetric distributions by using the absolute value of ranked set samples," Journal of Applied Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 30(3), pages 253-265.
    6. Vic Barnett & Karen Moore, 1997. "Best linear unbiased estimates in ranked-set sampling with particular reference to imperfect ordering," Journal of Applied Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(6), pages 697-710.
    7. Dinesh S. Bhoj, 2001. "Ranked Set Sampling with Unequal Samples," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 57(3), pages 957-962, September.
    8. Xiaofang He & Wangxue Chen & Wenshu Qian, 2020. "Maximum likelihood estimators of the parameters of the log-logistic distribution," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 61(5), pages 1875-1892, October.
    9. Jesse Frey & Timothy G. Feeman, 2017. "Efficiency comparisons for partially rank-ordered set sampling," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 58(4), pages 1149-1163, December.
    10. Frey, Jesse & Wang, Le, 2013. "Most powerful rank tests for perfect rankings," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 157-168.
    11. Cesar Augusto Taconeli & Suely Ruiz Giolo, 2020. "Maximum likelihood estimation based on ranked set sampling designs for two extensions of the Lindley distribution with uncensored and right-censored data," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 35(4), pages 1827-1851, December.
    12. A. Hussein & H. Muttlak & M. Saleh, 2013. "Group sequential comparison of two binomial proportions under ranked set sampling design," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 28(3), pages 1169-1194, June.
    13. Oualid Saci & Megdouda Ourbih-Tari & Leila Baiche, 2023. "Maximum Likelihood Estimation of Parameters of a Random Variable Using Monte Carlo Methods," Sankhya A: The Indian Journal of Statistics, Springer;Indian Statistical Institute, vol. 85(1), pages 540-571, February.
    14. Steven N. MacEachern & Ömer Öztürk & Douglas A. Wolfe & Gregory V. Stark, 2002. "A new ranked set sample estimator of variance," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 64(2), pages 177-188, May.
    15. H. M. Barakat & Haidy A. Newer, 2022. "Exact prediction intervals for future exponential and Pareto lifetimes based on ordered ranked set sampling of non-random and random size," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 63(6), pages 1801-1827, December.
    16. Wangxue Chen & Rui Yang & Dongsen Yao & Chunxian Long, 2021. "Pareto parameters estimation using moving extremes ranked set sampling," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 62(3), pages 1195-1211, June.
    17. Arnold, Barry C. & Castillo, Enrique & María Sarabia, José, 2009. "On multivariate order statistics. Application to ranked set sampling," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 53(12), pages 4555-4569, October.
    18. Xiaoyue Zhao & Zehua Chen, 2002. "On the Ranked-Set Sampling M-Estimates for Symmetric Location Families," Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Springer;The Institute of Statistical Mathematics, vol. 54(3), pages 626-640, September.
    19. Omer Ozturk & Steven MacEachern, 2004. "Order restricted randomized designs for control versus treatment comparison," Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Springer;The Institute of Statistical Mathematics, vol. 56(4), pages 701-720, December.
    20. N. Balakrishnan & M. Brito & A. Quiroz, 2013. "On the goodness-of-fit procedure for normality based on the empirical characteristic function for ranked set sampling data," Metrika: International Journal for Theoretical and Applied Statistics, Springer, vol. 76(2), pages 161-177, February.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:japsta:v:30:y:2003:i:9:p:1055-1078. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/CJAS20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.