IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/japsta/v25y1998i1p41-62.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Optimal design of accelerated life tests under modified stress loading methods

Author

Listed:
  • Sang-Jun Park
  • Bong-Jin Yum

Abstract

Most of the previous work on optimal design of accelerated life test (ALT) plans has assumed instantaneous changes in stress levels, which may not be possible or desirable in practice, because of the limited capability of test equipment, possible stress shocks or the presence of undesirable failure modes. We consider the case in which stress levels are changed at a finite rate, and develop two types of ALT plan under the assumptions of exponential lifetimes of test units and type I censoring. One type of plan is the modified step-stress ALT plan, and the other type is the modified constant-stress ALT plan. These two plans are compared in terms of the asymptotic variance of the maximum likelihood estimator of the log mean lifetime for the use condition (i.e. avar\[ln (0)]). Computational results indicate that, for both types of plan, avar\[ln (0)] is not sensitive to the stress-increasing rate R, if R is greater than or equal to 10, say, in the standardized scale. This implies that the proposed stress loading method can be used effectively with little loss in statistical efficiency. In terms of avar\[ln (0)], the modified step-stress ALT generally performs better than the modified constant-stress ALT, unless R or the probability of failure until the censoring time under a certain stress-increasing rate is small. We also compare the progressive-stress ALT plan with the above two modified ALT plans in terms of avar\[ln (0)], using the optimal stress-increasing rate R* determined for the progressivestress ALT plan. We find that the proposed ALTs perform better than the progressivestress ALT for the parameter values considered.

Suggested Citation

  • Sang-Jun Park & Bong-Jin Yum, 1998. "Optimal design of accelerated life tests under modified stress loading methods," Journal of Applied Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(1), pages 41-62.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:japsta:v:25:y:1998:i:1:p:41-62
    DOI: 10.1080/02664769823296
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/02664769823296
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/02664769823296?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bong‐Jin Yum & Seung‐Cheol Choi, 1989. "Optimal design of accelerated life tests under periodic inspection," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 36(6), pages 779-795, December.
    2. Sun‐Keun Seo & Bong‐Jin Yum, 1991. "Accelerated life test plans under intermittent inspection and type‐I censoring: The case of weibull failure distribution," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 38(1), pages 1-22, February.
    3. Do Sun Bai & Myung Soo Kim, 1993. "Optimum simple step‐stress accelerated life tests for weibull distribution and type I censoring," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 40(2), pages 193-210, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yoshio Komori, 2006. "Properties of the Weibull cumulative exposure model," Journal of Applied Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 33(1), pages 17-34.
    2. Cheng‐Hung Hu & Robert D. Plante & Jen Tang, 2013. "Statistical equivalency and optimality of simple step‐stress accelerated test plans for the exponential distribution," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 60(1), pages 19-30, February.
    3. Haitao Liao, 2009. "Optimal design of accelerated life testing plans for periodical replacement with penalty," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 56(1), pages 19-32, February.
    4. Haitao Liao & Elsayed A. Elsayed, 2010. "Equivalent accelerated life testing plans for log‐location‐scale distributions," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 57(5), pages 472-488, August.
    5. Refah Alotaibi & Faten S. Alamri & Ehab M. Almetwally & Min Wang & Hoda Rezk, 2022. "Classical and Bayesian Inference of a Progressive-Stress Model for the Nadarajah–Haghighi Distribution with Type II Progressive Censoring and Different Loss Functions," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-19, May.
    6. Preeti W Srivastava & Neha Mittal, 2013. "Optimum multi-objective modified constant-stress accelerated life test plan for the Burr type-XII distribution with type-I censoring," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 227(2), pages 132-143, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nesar Ahmad & A. Islam, 1996. "Optimal accelerated life test designs for Burr type XII distributions under periodic inspection and type I censoring," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 43(8), pages 1049-1077, December.
    2. Nadja Malevich & Christine H. Müller, 2019. "Optimal design of inspection times for interval censoring," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 60(2), pages 449-464, April.
    3. Jung‐Won Park & Bong‐Jin Yum, 1996. "Optimal design of accelerated life tests with two stresses," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 43(6), pages 863-884, September.
    4. Do Sun Bai & Myung Soo Kim, 1993. "Optimum simple step‐stress accelerated life tests for weibull distribution and type I censoring," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 40(2), pages 193-210, March.
    5. Sun‐Keun Seo & Bong‐Jin Yum, 1991. "Accelerated life test plans under intermittent inspection and type‐I censoring: The case of weibull failure distribution," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 38(1), pages 1-22, February.
    6. Haiming Ma & William Q. Meeker, 2008. "Optimum step‐stress accelerated life test plans for log‐location‐scale distributions," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 55(6), pages 551-562, September.
    7. A.D. Dharmadhikari & Md. Monsur Rahman, 2003. "A model for step‐stress accelerated life testing," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 50(8), pages 841-868, December.
    8. Ling, M.H. & Hu, X.W., 2020. "Optimal design of simple step-stress accelerated life tests for one-shot devices under Weibull distributions," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    9. Cheng‐Hung Hu & Robert D. Plante & Jen Tang, 2013. "Statistical equivalency and optimality of simple step‐stress accelerated test plans for the exponential distribution," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 60(1), pages 19-30, February.
    10. L.C. Tang & T.N. Goh & Y.S. Sun & H.L. Ong, 1999. "Planning accelerated life tests for censored two‐parameter exponential distributions," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 46(2), pages 169-186, March.
    11. Ling, Li & Xu, Wei & Li, Minghai, 2009. "Parametric inference for progressive Type-I hybrid censored data on a simple step-stress accelerated life test model," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 79(10), pages 3110-3121.
    12. Chien-Tai Lin & Cheng-Chieh Chou & N. Balakrishnan, 2020. "Planning step-stress test plans under Type-I hybrid censoring for the log-location-scale distribution," Statistical Methods & Applications, Springer;Società Italiana di Statistica, vol. 29(2), pages 265-288, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:japsta:v:25:y:1998:i:1:p:41-62. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/CJAS20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.