IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/indinn/v8y2001i1p49-78.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Competitive Dynamics Of Technological Standardization: The Case Of Third Generation Cellular Communications

Author

Listed:
  • Henrik Glimstedt

Abstract

This article is concerned with the processes through which technological standards are developed, and how these standards provide the underpinnings of new markets for global cellular communication. The case investigated is that of so-called third generation mobile communications, involving advanced multimedia and Internet access. The article explores how the main actors at the outset, used the process of standardization to strategically strengthen their respective market positions, and how standardization wars spread from the level of firms to government and supra-governmental organizations. Using the conflict between Ericsson and Qualcomm in the area of air radio interface standards as a key example, the article shows how the actors, because of institutional conditions and pressures, were reconciled and moved towards collaborative patterns of behavior, supporting a ''family'' of compatible standards.

Suggested Citation

  • Henrik Glimstedt, 2001. "Competitive Dynamics Of Technological Standardization: The Case Of Third Generation Cellular Communications," Industry and Innovation, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 8(1), pages 49-78.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:indinn:v:8:y:2001:i:1:p:49-78
    DOI: 10.1080/13662710120034400
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/13662710120034400
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/13662710120034400?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bach, David, 2000. "International Cooperation and the Logic of Networks: Europe and the Global System for Mobile Communications (GSM)," UCAIS Berkeley Roundtable on the International Economy, Working Paper Series qt7365v5g5, UCAIS Berkeley Roundtable on the International Economy, UC Berkeley.
    2. Dang Nguyen, Godefroy & Schneider, Volker & Werle, Raymund, 1993. "Corporate actor networks in European policy making: Harmonizing telecommunications policy," MPIfG Discussion Paper 93/4, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Vitor Trindade & Johannes Moenius, 2007. "Networks, Standards and Intellectual Property Rights," Working Papers 0705, Department of Economics, University of Missouri.
    2. Jürgens, Ulrich & Sablowski, Thomas, 2008. "Sektorale Innovationsprozesse und die Diskussion über deutsche Innovationsschwächen," Study / edition der Hans-Böckler-Stiftung, Hans-Böckler-Stiftung, Düsseldorf, volume 127, number 204, June.
    3. Bonnín Roca, Jaime & Vaishnav, Parth & Morgan, Granger M. & Fuchs, Erica & Mendonça, Joana, 2021. "Technology Forgiveness: Why emerging technologies differ in their resilience to institutional instability," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 166(C).
    4. Michael Murphree & Dan Breznitz, 2018. "Indigenous digital technology standards for development: The case of China," Journal of International Business Policy, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 1(3), pages 234-252, December.
    5. Vajk Lukacs de Pereny Martens & Ronnie Ramlogan, 2015. "Standardization and Governance Dynamics in the Peruvian Alpaca Fibre Value Chain," Globelics Working Paper Series 2015-10, Globelics - Global Network for Economics of Learning, Innovation, and Competence Building Systems, Aalborg University, Department of Business and Management.
    6. Casper, Steven & Whitley, Richard, 2004. "Managing competences in entrepreneurial technology firms: a comparative institutional analysis of Germany, Sweden and the UK," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 33(1), pages 89-106, January.
    7. Steven Casper & Richard Whitley, 2002. "Managing competences in entrepreneurial technology firms: a comparative institutional analysis of Germany, Sweden and the UK," Working Papers wp230, Centre for Business Research, University of Cambridge.
    8. Lazonick William, 2008. "Comment on "Technological Revolutions and the Evolution of Industrial Structures" (by Giovanni Dosi, Alfonso Gambardella, Marco Grazzi, and Luigi Orsenigo)," Capitalism and Society, De Gruyter, vol. 3(1), pages 1-22, June.
    9. Hu Wen & Daniel You-Ren Yang, 2010. "The Missing Link between Technological Standards and Value-Chain Governance: The Case of Patent-Distribution Strategies in the Mobile-Communication Industry," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 42(9), pages 2109-2130, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Palmberg, Christopher & Martikainen, Olli, 2003. "Overcoming a Technological Discontinuity - The Case of the Finnish Telecom Industry and the GSM," Discussion Papers 855, The Research Institute of the Finnish Economy.
    2. Ryll, Andreas, 1989. "Die Spieltheorie als Instrument der Gesellschaftsforschung," MPIfG Discussion Paper 89/10, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies.
    3. Jain, Rekha & Dara, Rishabh, 2017. "Framework for evolving spectrum management regimes: Lessons from India," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 41(5), pages 473-485.
    4. Genschel, Philipp, 1995. "Standards in der Informationstechnik: Institutioneller Wandel in der internationalen Standardisierung," Schriften aus dem Max-Planck-Institut für Gesellschaftsforschung Köln, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies, volume 22, number 22.
    5. Dunsire, Andrew, 1993. "Manipulating social tensions: Collibration as an alternative mode of government intervention," MPIfG Discussion Paper 93/7, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies.
    6. A Jones & J R A Clark, 1998. "The Agri-Environment Regulation EU 2078/92: The Role of the European Commission in Policy Shaping and Setting," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 16(1), pages 51-68, February.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:indinn:v:8:y:2001:i:1:p:49-78. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/CIAI20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.