IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/ginixx/v32y2006i1p27-48.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The International Realm, Framing Effects, and Security Strategies: Britain in Peace and War

Author

Listed:
  • Steven E. Lobell

Abstract

In combining the domestic and international levels, I contend that the international environment can enable a domestic win-set and thereby guide the formation of a state's international security strategy. The trigger is the nature of and changes in the extant international setting. Based on findings from framing effects and prospect theory, I contend that periods of external crisis, conflict, and war will shift the public's domain to one of relative losses. In this realm, it will be easier for foreign policy advisors who favor offensive security strategies to frame the national debate. Periods of international peace, tranquility, and prosperity will shift the public's domain to relative gains, which will make it easier for advisors who favor risk averse and defensive strategies to frame the national discussion. The outcome can be a more offensive or defensive strategy than the state would have otherwise pursued. I apply the model to Britain to examine Britain's decision to adopt a Limited Liability strategy between 1912 and 1914, and to escalate to a Continental Commitment by 1916. A version of this paper was presented at the 2003 Annual International Studies Association Convention. I would like to thank Jane Cramer, Tom Rice, and Jeffrey Taliaferro for their helpful comments and suggestions.

Suggested Citation

  • Steven E. Lobell, 2006. "The International Realm, Framing Effects, and Security Strategies: Britain in Peace and War," International Interactions, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 32(1), pages 27-48, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:ginixx:v:32:y:2006:i:1:p:27-48
    DOI: 10.1080/03050620600574857
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/03050620600574857
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/03050620600574857?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Peden, G. C., 2000. "The Treasury and British Public Policy 1906-1959," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780198207078, Decembrie.
    2. Tomlinson, Jim, 1994. "Government and the Enterprise since 1900," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780198287490, Decembrie.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Steven E. Lobell, 2004. "Politics and National Security: The Battles for Britain," Conflict Management and Peace Science, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 21(4), pages 269-286, September.
    2. Robert Wapshott & Oliver Mallett, 2018. "Small and medium-sized enterprise policy: Designed to fail?," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 36(4), pages 750-772, June.
    3. Glen O'Hara, 2009. "'What the electorate can be expected to swallow': Nationalisation, transnationalism and the shifting boundaries of the state in post-war Britain," Business History, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 51(4), pages 501-528.
    4. Matthew Cooper, 2021. "‘21st Century Welfare’ in Historical Perspective: Disciplinary Welfare in the Depression of the 1930s and Its Implications for Today," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 26(2), pages 326-342, June.
    5. Christoph Farquet, 2012. "The Rise Of The Swiss Tax Haven In The Interwar Period: An International Comparison," Working Papers 0027, European Historical Economics Society (EHES).
    6. James Cloyne & Nicholas Dimsdale & Natacha Postel-Vinay, 2018. "Taxes and Growth: New Narrative Evidence from Interwar Britain," NBER Working Papers 24659, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    7. Eichengreen, Barry & Irwin, Douglas A., 2010. "The Slide to Protectionism in the Great Depression: Who Succumbed and Why?," The Journal of Economic History, Cambridge University Press, vol. 70(4), pages 871-897, December.
    8. Robert Skidelsky, 2016. "How Keynes came to Britain," Review of Keynesian Economics, Edward Elgar Publishing, vol. 4(1), pages 4-19, January.
    9. Renaud Bellais & Fanny Coulomb, 2008. "The Fight Of A 'Citizen Economist' For Peace And Prosperity: Keynes And The Issues Of International Security," Defence and Peace Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(5), pages 361-371.
    10. Rog?ro Arthmar & Michael McLure, 2016. "A. C. Pigou and the ?Real Purpose? of the 1924-25 Committee on the Currency and Bank of England Note Issues," HISTORY OF ECONOMIC THOUGHT AND POLICY, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2016(1), pages 5-19.
    11. Valerio Cerretano, 2009. "The Treasury, Britain's postwar reconstruction, and the industrial intervention of the Bank of England, 1921–91," Economic History Review, Economic History Society, vol. 62(s1), pages 80-100, August.
    12. G.C. Peden, 2003. "New revisionists and the Keynesian era in British economic policy: a comment," Economic History Review, Economic History Society, vol. 56(1), pages 118-124, February.
    13. Singleton,John, 2010. "Central Banking in the Twentieth Century," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521899093.
    14. Ryo Izawa, 2018. "Corporate Structural Change for Tax Avoidance: British Multinational Enterprises and International Double Taxation between the First and Second World Wars," Discussion Papers CRR Discussion Paper Series A: General 33, Shiga University, Faculty of Economics,Center for Risk Research.
    15. Rogerio Arthmar & Michael Mclure, 2016. "Pigou On War Finance And State Action," Anais do XLIII Encontro Nacional de Economia [Proceedings of the 43rd Brazilian Economics Meeting] 011, ANPEC - Associação Nacional dos Centros de Pós-Graduação em Economia [Brazilian Association of Graduate Programs in Economics].
    16. Mark Billings & Simon Mollan & Philip Garnett, 2021. "Debating banking in Britain: The Colwyn committee, 1918," Business History, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 63(6), pages 944-965, August.
    17. Mark Billings & Lynne Oats, 2014. "Innovation and pragmatism in tax design: Excess Profits Duty in the UK during the First World War," Accounting History Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(2-3), pages 83-101, November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:ginixx:v:32:y:2006:i:1:p:27-48. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/GINI20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.