IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this article

Have public health spending and access in South Africa become more equitable since the end of apartheid?

Listed author(s):
  • Ronelle Burger
  • Caryn Bredenkamp
  • Christelle Grobler
  • Servaas van der Berg

This study investigates whether health spending and access to services in South Africa have become more or less pro-poor over time. We find that over the post-apartheid period health spending has become significantly more pro-poor. In addition to the rising share of the health budget allocated to public clinics, there has been an increase in the share of public clinic and hospital spending going to the poor and a rising share of the health budget allocated to public clinics. In addition, between 1993 and 2008 there were improvements in both financial access to public health services -- as measured by the incidence of catastrophic costs -- and physical access to public health facilities -- as measured by reduced travel time. Given that substantial progress has been made with fiscal equity and access to health, problems that users complain about -- rude staff, long queues and lack of medicine -- have moved higher on the policy agenda.

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL:
Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.

Article provided by Taylor & Francis Journals in its journal Development Southern Africa.

Volume (Year): 29 (2012)
Issue (Month): 5 (December)
Pages: 681-703

in new window

Handle: RePEc:taf:deveza:v:29:y:2012:i:5:p:681-703
DOI: 10.1080/0376835X.2012.730971
Contact details of provider: Web page:

Order Information: Web:

No references listed on IDEAS
You can help add them by filling out this form.

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:deveza:v:29:y:2012:i:5:p:681-703. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Chris Longhurst)

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.