IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/deveza/v29y2012i5p681-703.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Have public health spending and access in South Africa become more equitable since the end of apartheid?

Author

Listed:
  • Ronelle Burger
  • Caryn Bredenkamp
  • Christelle Grobler
  • Servaas van der Berg

Abstract

This study investigates whether health spending and access to services in South Africa have become more or less pro-poor over time. We find that over the post-apartheid period health spending has become significantly more pro-poor. In addition to the rising share of the health budget allocated to public clinics, there has been an increase in the share of public clinic and hospital spending going to the poor and a rising share of the health budget allocated to public clinics. In addition, between 1993 and 2008 there were improvements in both financial access to public health services -- as measured by the incidence of catastrophic costs -- and physical access to public health facilities -- as measured by reduced travel time. Given that substantial progress has been made with fiscal equity and access to health, problems that users complain about -- rude staff, long queues and lack of medicine -- have moved higher on the policy agenda.

Suggested Citation

  • Ronelle Burger & Caryn Bredenkamp & Christelle Grobler & Servaas van der Berg, 2012. "Have public health spending and access in South Africa become more equitable since the end of apartheid?," Development Southern Africa, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 29(5), pages 681-703, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:deveza:v:29:y:2012:i:5:p:681-703
    DOI: 10.1080/0376835X.2012.730971
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/0376835X.2012.730971
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Wagstaff, Adam & Bilger, Marcel & Buisman, Leander R. & Bredenkamp, Caryn, 2014. "Who benefits from government health spending and why? a global assessment," Policy Research Working Paper Series 7044, The World Bank.
    2. Zoƫ McLaren & Cally Ardington & Murray Leibbrandt, 2013. "Distance as a barrier to health care access in South Africa," SALDRU Working Papers 097, Southern Africa Labour and Development Research Unit, University of Cape Town.
    3. Rossouw Laura, 2015. "Poor Health Reporting: Do Poor South Africans Underestimate Their Health Needs?," WIDER Working Paper Series 027, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    4. Ahmed Shoukry Rashad & Mesbah Fathy Sharaf, 2015. "Who Benefits from Public Healthcare Subsidies in Egypt?," Social Sciences, MDPI, Open Access Journal, vol. 4(4), pages 1-15, November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:deveza:v:29:y:2012:i:5:p:681-703. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Chris Longhurst). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/CDSA20 .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.