IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/conmgt/v21y2003i6p651-654.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How innovative is construction? Comparing aggregated data on construction innovation and other sectors - a case of apples and pears

Author

Listed:
  • Graham Winch

Abstract

This research note addresses the widespread perception that construction performs badly compared to other industrial sectors. The evidence for this perception is usually based on comparative industrial performance data. However, due to technical problems with the Standard Industrial Classifications used, like is not compared with like in these analyses, to the systematic disadvantage of the construction industry's comparative performance. In an effort to improve the performance of the industry, the auto industry is often held up as an exemplar. However, when that industry is compared on a like-for-like basis with construction, it proves to have a poor record of performance.

Suggested Citation

  • Graham Winch, 2003. "How innovative is construction? Comparing aggregated data on construction innovation and other sectors - a case of apples and pears," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(6), pages 651-654.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:conmgt:v:21:y:2003:i:6:p:651-654
    DOI: 10.1080/0144619032000113708
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/0144619032000113708
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/0144619032000113708?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Pia Pässilä & Lauri Pulkka & Seppo Junnila, 2015. "How to Succeed in Low-Energy Housing—Path Creation Analysis of Low-Energy Innovation Projects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(7), pages 1-22, July.
    2. Jan Bröchner, 2010. "Innovation in Construction," Chapters, in: Faïz Gallouj & Faridah Djellal (ed.), The Handbook of Innovation and Services, chapter 31, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    3. Manley, Karen, 2008. "Against the odds: Small firms in Australia successfully introducing new technology on construction projects," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(10), pages 1751-1764, December.
    4. Diane Coyle & David Nguyen, 2019. "No plant, no problem? Factoryless manufacturing and economic measurement," Economic Statistics Centre of Excellence (ESCoE) Discussion Papers ESCoE DP-2019-15, Economic Statistics Centre of Excellence (ESCoE).
    5. Athena Roumboutsos & St�phane Saussier, 2014. "Public-private partnerships and investments in innovation: the influence of the contractual arrangement," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 32(4), pages 349-361, April.
    6. Faïz Gallouj & Faridah Djellal (ed.), 2010. "The Handbook of Innovation and Services," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 12872.
    7. Gooding, Luke & Gul, Mehreen S., 2017. "Achieving growth within the UK's Domestic Energy Efficiency Retrofitting Services sector, practitioner experiences and strategies moving forward," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 173-182.
    8. Ilter A. Tolga, 2016. "Innovation enablers: A review of Turkish contractors’ collaborative activities and sources of information," Organization, Technology and Management in Construction, Sciendo, vol. 8(1), pages 1397-1404, December.
    9. Nor’Aini Yusof & Ernawati Mustafa Kamal & Lai Kong-Seng & Mohammad Iranmanesh, 2014. "Are Innovations Being Created or Adopted in the Construction Industry? Exploring Innovation in the Construction Industry," SAGE Open, , vol. 4(3), pages 21582440145, September.
    10. Fabian Unterlass, 2010. "Innovation im Bauwesen. Determinanten des Innovationsverhaltens österreichischer Bauunternehmen," WIFO Monatsberichte (monthly reports), WIFO, vol. 83(9), pages 767-780, September.
    11. Wang, Nannan & Gong, Zheng & Xu, Zhuhuizi & Liu, Zhankun & Han, Yu, 2021. "A quantitative investigation of the technological innovation in large construction companies," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 65(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:conmgt:v:21:y:2003:i:6:p:651-654. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RCME20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.