IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this article

A switching regression approach to the stationarity of systematic and non-systematic risks: the Hong Kong experience

Listed author(s):
  • Joseph Cheng
Registered author(s):

    The switching regression method of Goldfeld and Quandt (Technique for estimating switching regressions, in Studies in Nonlinear Regression, ed. S. M. Goldfeld and R. E. Quandt, Ballinger, Cambridge MA, 1976) is used to examine the stationarity of systematic and non-systematic risks of Hong Kong's common stocks via the stability of the market model parameters for six industry portfolios and four family portfolios. Empirical evidence for the industry portfolios suggests that the systematic risk component is fairly stable throughout the sample period. However, non-systematic risk tends to decline over the 13-year horizon from February 1980 to December 1992. This may also imply a reduction in the industry's unique risk proportion relative to its total risk level. Hence, security analysts may as well direct relatively more efforts and resources towards analysing the overall market performance rather than focusing extensively on individual industry. Similar findings emerge concerning the non-systematic component of the family portfolios. The evidence of a reduction in industry as well as family-specific risk may further suggest that the benefits of diversifying across different industry sectors or across different family groups may have been diminishing over the past decade. However, the shifts in the structure of systematic and nonsystematic risks of the family portfolios do not appear to have drastically affected the pay-off from analysing and monitoring stocks of individual families.

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.

    Article provided by Taylor & Francis Journals in its journal Applied Financial Economics.

    Volume (Year): 7 (1997)
    Issue (Month): 1 ()
    Pages: 45-57

    in new window

    Handle: RePEc:taf:apfiec:v:7:y:1997:i:1:p:45-57
    DOI: 10.1080/096031097333844
    Contact details of provider: Web page:

    Order Information: Web:

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:apfiec:v:7:y:1997:i:1:p:45-57. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Michael McNulty)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.