Optimally weighting higher-moment instruments to deal with measurement errors in financial return models
Factor loadings are often measured with errors in financial return models. However, these models find applications in many fields of economics and finance. We present a new procedure to optimally weight two well-known cumulant (higher moments) estimators originally designed to deal with errors-in-variables. We develop a new version of the Hausman test which relies on these new instruments in order to build an indicator of measurement errors providing information about the extent of the bias for an estimated coefficient. We apply our new methodology to a well-known financial return model, i.e. the Fama and French (1997) model, over a sample of Hedge Fund Research (HFR) returns, whose distribution is strongly asymmetric and leptokurtic. Our experiments suggest that the market beta is biased by measurement errors, especially at the level of hedge fund strategies. Nevertheless, the alpha puzzle remains robust to our cumulant instruments.
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.
Volume (Year): 22 (2012)
Issue (Month): 14 (July)
|Contact details of provider:|| Web page: http://www.tandfonline.com/RAFE20|
|Order Information:||Web: http://www.tandfonline.com/pricing/journal/RAFE20|
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:apfiec:v:22:y:2012:i:14:p:1135-1146. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Michael McNulty)
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.
If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.