IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/apeclt/v30y2023i16p2245-2251.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Testing for market efficiency in cryptocurrencies: evidence from a non-linear conditional quantile framework

Author

Listed:
  • Myeong Jun Kim
  • Sung Y. Park

Abstract

This study tests for the weak-form market efficiency of 15 cryptocurrency prices. The conventional unit root tests and stationary test results reveal that most cryptocurrency markets are efficient markets. However, the non-linear quantile unit root test proposed by Li and Park (2018) rejects the unit root null hypothesis over the whole quantile level. To derive more informative ideas, we split the whole quantile interval to several sub-intervals and find asymmetric behaviour of the market efficiency across the lower and upper sub-intervals in several cryptocurrency markets. Moreover, non-linear quantile unit root tests for Chainlink, Bitcoin Cash, Binance Coin, EOS, Tron, and Stellar indicate that markets for these cryptocurrencies are efficient at the upper sub-intervals.

Suggested Citation

  • Myeong Jun Kim & Sung Y. Park, 2023. "Testing for market efficiency in cryptocurrencies: evidence from a non-linear conditional quantile framework," Applied Economics Letters, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 30(16), pages 2245-2251, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:apeclt:v:30:y:2023:i:16:p:2245-2251
    DOI: 10.1080/13504851.2022.2096851
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/13504851.2022.2096851
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/13504851.2022.2096851?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hu, Yang & Valera, Harold Glenn A. & Oxley, Les, 2019. "Market efficiency of the top market-cap cryptocurrencies: Further evidence from a panel framework," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 31(C), pages 138-145.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kilic, Emre & Yavuz, Ersin & Pazarci, Sevket & Kar, Asim, 2023. "Analyzing the efficient market hypothesis with asymmetric persistence in cryptocurrencies: Insights from the Fourier non-linear quantile unit root approach," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 58(PC).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Eugene Msizi Buthelezi, 2024. "Navigating Global Uncertainty: Examining the Effect of Geopolitical Risks on Cryptocurrency Prices and Volatility in a Markov-Switching Vector Autoregressive Model," International Economic Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 38(4), pages 564-590, October.
    2. KOUAKOU, Thiédjé Gaudens-Omer, 2025. "Volatilité et régulation des cryptomonnaies : approche monétaire orthodoxe versus approche monétaire hétérodoxe [Volatility and regulation of cryptocurrencies: orthodox monetary approach versus het," MPRA Paper 123774, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    3. Carmen López-Martín & Sonia Benito Muela & Raquel Arguedas, 2021. "Efficiency in cryptocurrency markets: new evidence," Eurasian Economic Review, Springer;Eurasia Business and Economics Society, vol. 11(3), pages 403-431, September.
    4. Colon, Francisco & Kim, Chaehyun & Kim, Hana & Kim, Wonjoon, 2021. "The effect of political and economic uncertainty on the cryptocurrency market," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 39(C).
    5. Manahov, Viktor & Urquhart, Andrew, 2021. "The efficiency of Bitcoin: A strongly typed genetic programming approach to smart electronic Bitcoin markets," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 73(C).
    6. Aslan, Aylin & Sensoy, Ahmet, 2020. "Intraday efficiency-frequency nexus in the cryptocurrency markets," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 35(C).
    7. Rasim Özcan & Asad ul Islam KHAN & Sundas Iftikhar, 2024. "Whether The Cr Whether The Crypto Market Is Efficient? E et Is Efficient? Evidence F vidence From Testing The Validity Of The Efficient Market Hypothesis," Bulletin of Monetary Economics and Banking, Bank Indonesia, vol. 27(1), pages 113-132, March.
    8. Le Thanh Ha, 2022. "Interlinkages of cryptocurrency and stock markets during COVID-19 pandemic by applying a TVP-VAR extended joint connected approach," Journal of Economic Studies, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 50(3), pages 407-428, March.
    9. Muhammad Irfan & Mubeen Abdur Rehman & Sarah Nawazish & Yu Hao, 2023. "Performance Analysis of Gold- and Fiat-Backed Cryptocurrencies: Risk-Based Choice for a Portfolio," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-15, February.
    10. Fung, Kennard & Jeong, Jiin & Pereira, Javier, 2022. "More to cryptos than bitcoin: A GARCH modelling of heterogeneous cryptocurrencies," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 47(PA).
    11. Helder Miguel Correia Virtuoso Sebastião & Paulo José Osório Rupino Da Cunha & Pedro Manuel Cortesão Godinho, 2021. "Cryptocurrencies and blockchain. Overview and future perspectives," International Journal of Economics and Business Research, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 21(3), pages 305-342.
    12. Mingbo Zheng & Gen-Fu Feng & Xinxin Zhao & Chun-Ping Chang, 2023. "The transaction behavior of cryptocurrency and electricity consumption," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 9(1), pages 1-18, December.
    13. Liu, Jianjian & Wang, Shuhan & Xiang, Lijin & Ma, Shiqun & Xiao, Zumian, 2024. "Unveiling hidden connections: Spillover among BRICS' cryptocurrency-implied exchange rate discounts and US financial markets," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    14. Kristjanpoller, Werner & Nekhili, Ramzi & Bouri, Elie, 2024. "Ethereum futures and the efficiency of cryptocurrency spot markets," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 654(C).
    15. Khaled Mokni & Ghassen El Montasser & Ahdi Noomen Ajmi & Elie Bouri, 2024. "On the efficiency and its drivers in the cryptocurrency market: the case of Bitcoin and Ethereum," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 10(1), pages 1-25, December.
    16. Karasiński Jacek, 2023. "The adaptive market hypothesis and the return predictability in the cryptocurrency markets," Economics and Business Review, Sciendo, vol. 9(1), pages 94-118, April.
    17. José Almeida & Tiago Cruz Gonçalves, 2024. "Cryptocurrency market microstructure: a systematic literature review," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 332(1), pages 1035-1068, January.
    18. Lin Xiao & Vesarach Aumeboonsuke, 2022. "Co-Integration among COVID-19, Investor Sentiment, and the Stock Market," Humanities and Social Sciences Letters, Conscientia Beam, vol. 10(4), pages 492-510.
    19. Pradipta Kumar Sahoo & Dinabandhu Sethi, 2024. "Market efficiency of the cryptocurrencies: Some new evidence based on price–volume relationship," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 29(2), pages 1569-1580, April.
    20. Manel Mahjoubi & Jamel Eddine Henchiri, 2024. "The effect of policy uncertainty on the volatility of bitcoin," Journal of Financial Economic Policy, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 16(4), pages 429-441, May.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:apeclt:v:30:y:2023:i:16:p:2245-2251. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RAEL20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.