IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/accted/v13y2004i4p529-548.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Encouraging better learning through better teaching: a study of approaches to teaching in accounting

Author

Listed:
  • Lynne Leveson

Abstract

The study reported in this paper investigates aspects of the teaching experience of academics teaching accounting at Australian universities. Twenty-four academics were interviewed about their conceptions of teaching, their students' learning and their teaching approach in relation to the accounting classes they were currently teaching. Four qualitatively different ways of conceptualising teaching and five for learning and teaching approach were identified within the data. Broadly, these are interpreted as falling under one of two orientations—teacher-centred/content and a student-centred/learning orientation. The key differences identified between them relate to whether teaching in the discipline is viewed primarily as a matter of transmitting facts and procedures or of encouraging students to develop their own accounting concepts and perhaps to even change their world view in the process. The results are discussed in relation to some of the practical realities of day-to-day teaching and to possible future avenues for research.

Suggested Citation

  • Lynne Leveson, 2004. "Encouraging better learning through better teaching: a study of approaches to teaching in accounting," Accounting Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 13(4), pages 529-548.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:accted:v:13:y:2004:i:4:p:529-548
    DOI: 10.1080/0963928042000306819
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/0963928042000306819
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/0963928042000306819?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ralph Adler & Markus Milne & Carolyn Stringer, 2000. "Identifying and overcoming obstacles to learner-centred approaches in tertiary accounting education: a field study and survey of accounting educators' perceptions," Accounting Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 9(2), pages 113-134.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Margaret Healy & Maeve McCutcheon, 2010. "Teaching with Case Studies: An Empirical Investigation of Accounting Lecturers' Experiences," Accounting Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(6), pages 555-567.
    2. Mustafa AY, 2011. "Commercial High School Students Conceptual Structures of Accounting," Far East Journal of Psychology and Business, Far East Research Centre, vol. 2(2), pages 24-36, February.
    3. Belete J. Bobe & Barry J. Cooper, 2020. "Accounting students’ perceptions of effective teaching and approaches to learning: impact on overall student satisfaction," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 60(3), pages 2099-2143, September.
    4. Huang, Haijie & Lee, Edward & Lyu, Changjiang & Zhu, Zhenmei, 2016. "The effect of accounting academics in the boardroom on the value relevance of financial reporting information," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 18-30.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Margaret Healy & Maeve McCutcheon, 2010. "Teaching with Case Studies: An Empirical Investigation of Accounting Lecturers' Experiences," Accounting Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(6), pages 555-567.
    2. Paul Wells & Paul De Lange & Peter Fieger, 2008. "Integrating a virtual learning environment into a second‐year accounting course: determinants of overall student perception," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 48(3), pages 503-518, September.
    3. Penne Ainsworth, 2001. "Changes in accounting curricula: discussion and design," Accounting Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 10(3), pages 279-297.
    4. Catriona Paisey & Nicholas Paisey, 2003. "Developing research awareness in students: an action research project explored," Accounting Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 12(3), pages 283-302.
    5. A. Arnold & Roger Mills & Markus Milne, 2002. "Book reviews," Accounting and Business Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 32(3), pages 187-191.
    6. Dixon, Keith, 2011. "Assessment at the centre of strategies of [accountant] learning in groups, substantiated with qualitative reflections in student assessments," MPRA Paper 29861, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    7. Sonia Magdziarz & Kim Watty & Kaye Hilliar & Sophia Ji & Melissa Simpson, 2006. "Reflections on the mentoring process with academics entering a “new” educational," Asian Review of Accounting, Emerald Group Publishing, vol. 14(1), pages 37-48, July.
    8. Jacqueline Birt & Maryam Safari & Vincent Bicudo de Castro, 2023. "Critical analysis of integration of ICT and data analytics into the accounting curriculum: A multidimensional perspective," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 63(4), pages 4037-4063, December.
    9. McGowan, Sue & Potter, Lucy, 2008. "The implications of the Chinese learner for the internationalization of the curriculum: An Australian perspective," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 19(2), pages 181-198.
    10. Sonia Magdziarz & Kim Watty & Kaye Hilliar & Sophia Ji & Melissa Simpson, 2006. "Developing a scholarly approach to the evaluation of assessment practices," Asian Review of Accounting, Emerald Group Publishing, vol. 14(1), pages 24-36, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:accted:v:13:y:2004:i:4:p:529-548. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RAED20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.