IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spt/admaec/v15y2025i1f15_1_4.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Exploring Valuable Indicators for Classifying Strong and Weak Patents Based on Invalidation Reexamination Decisions

Author

Listed:
  • Guangyun Deng
  • Hui-Chung Che
  • Yingwu Peng

Abstract

Based on 8,666 invalidation reexamined China invention grant patents of decision dates from 2000 to 2021, the effect and value of eight indicators for classifying strong and weak patents in nine technology areas, including overall technology and eight technology sections, was thoroughly analyzed via ANOVA. Two high valuable indicators including abstract word count and examination duration for classification were found, which respectively showed significance in five technology areas. Four less valuable indicators, including claim count, figure count, inventor count and IPC count, were found to respectively show significance in one or two technology areas. A valueless indicator of applicant count was found to show none of significance in any technology areas. The strong patents did not always show higher indicator means of significance. Especially for the high valuable indicator of examination duration, the strong patents showed lower means in any of five technology areas of significance. The finding of this research would contribute the state of art in evaluating patents and help patent owners improve their patent asset management strategy. Â JEL classification numbers: C38, C46, G11, G12.

Suggested Citation

  • Guangyun Deng & Hui-Chung Che & Yingwu Peng, 2025. "Exploring Valuable Indicators for Classifying Strong and Weak Patents Based on Invalidation Reexamination Decisions," Advances in Management and Applied Economics, SCIENPRESS Ltd, vol. 15(1), pages 1-4.
    • Handle: RePEc:spt:admaec:v:15:y:2025:i:1:f:15_1_4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.scienpress.com/Upload/AMAE%2fVol%2015_1_4.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dang, Jianwei & Motohashi, Kazuyuki, 2015. "Patent statistics: A good indicator for innovation in China? Patent subsidy program impacts on patent quality," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 35(C), pages 137-155.
    2. Chin-Yi Chen & Ching-Lin Chu & Hui-Chung Che & Hong-Wen Tsai, 2022. "Using Patent Drawings to Differentiate Stock Return Rate of China Listed Companies. A Study on China Patent Species of Utility Model Grant," Advances in Management and Applied Economics, SCIENPRESS Ltd, vol. 12(4), pages 1-1.
    3. Boeing, Philipp & Mueller, Elisabeth, 2019. "Measuring China's patent quality: Development and validation of ISR indices," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 57(C).
    4. Chin-Yi Chen & Ching-Lin Chu & Hui-Chung Che & Hong-Wen Tsai & Bo Bai, 2022. "Using Patent Drawings to Differentiate Stock Return Rate of China Listed Companies. A Study on China Patent Species of Invention Grant," Advances in Management and Applied Economics, SCIENPRESS Ltd, vol. 12(3), pages 1-4.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chin-Yi Chen & Ching-Lin Chu & Hui-Chung Che & Hong-Wen Tsai, 2022. "Using Patent Drawings to Differentiate Stock Return Rate of China Listed Companies. A Study on China Patent Species of Utility Model Grant," Advances in Management and Applied Economics, SCIENPRESS Ltd, vol. 12(4), pages 1-1.
    2. Zheng, Shilin & Li, Zhaochen, 2020. "Pilot governance and the rise of China's innovation," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 63(C).
    3. Yao, Shiyue & Yu, Xueying & Yan, Sen & Wen, Shiyan, 2021. "Heterogeneous emission trading schemes and green innovation," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 155(C).
    4. Chin-Yi Chen & Ching-Lin Chu & Hui-Chung Che & Hong-Wen Tsai & Bo Bai, 2022. "Using Patent Drawings to Differentiate Stock Return Rate of China Listed Companies. A Study on China Patent Species of Invention Grant," Advances in Management and Applied Economics, SCIENPRESS Ltd, vol. 12(3), pages 1-4.
    5. Zihao Jiang & Jiarong Shi, 2023. "Quantity or quality? Policy effects on innovations in the wind power industry in China," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 44(8), pages 4507-4522, December.
    6. Boeing, Philipp, 2020. "Innovative China: R&D subsidies, patent measures, and productivity," ZEW Expert Briefs 20-15, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.
    7. Bei Liu & Jinmin Wang & Xinle Tong & Zhihua Zhou & Zhaoxuan Qiu, 2024. "Institutional investor shareholding and the quality of corporate innovation: Moderating effects based on internal and external environment," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 45(1), pages 326-338, January.
    8. Luo, Lianfa & Cheng, Zhiming & Ye, Qingqing & Cheng, Yanjun & Smyth, Russell & Yang, Zhiqing & Zhang, Le, 2024. "Nonmonetary awards and innovation: Evidence from winning China's Top Brand Contest," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 86(C).
    9. Qizhen Wang & Rong Wang & Suxia Liu, 2024. "The reverse technology spillover effect of outward foreign direct investment, energy efficiency and carbon emissions," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(7), pages 17013-17035, July.
    10. Dai, Xiaoyong & Wang, Mengqi, 2024. "Unintended effects of tax incentives on firms’ strategic patenting," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 219(C), pages 1-24.
    11. Deyun Yin & Kazuyuki Motohashi & Jianwei Dang, 2020. "Large-scale name disambiguation of Chinese patent inventors (1985–2016)," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 122(2), pages 765-790, February.
    12. Xiaodong Yuan & Weiling Song, 2022. "Evaluating technology innovation capabilities of companies based on entropy- TOPSIS: the case of solar cell companies," Information Technology and Management, Springer, vol. 23(2), pages 65-76, June.
    13. Pei Zhang & Peiran Chen & Fan Xiao & Yong Sun & Shuyan Ma & Ziwei Zhao, 2022. "The Impact of Information Infrastructure on Air Pollution: Empirical Evidence from China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(21), pages 1-17, November.
    14. Li, Xiaoying & Tan, Ying, 2020. "University R&D activities and firm innovations," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 37(C).
    15. Sun, Xiuli & Li, Haizheng & Ghosal, Vivek, 2020. "Firm-level human capital and innovation: Evidence from China," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 59(C).
    16. Jiafeng Gu, 2021. "Effects of Patent Policy on Outputs and Commercialization of Academic Patents in China: A Spatial Difference-in-Differences Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-17, December.
    17. Xu Wang & Xiaobo Zhang & Zhuan Xie & Huang Yiping, 2016. "Roads to Innovation: Firm-Level Evidence from China," Working Papers id:11121, eSocialSciences.
    18. Zhao, Shikuan & Cao, Yuequn & Hunjra, Ahmed Imran & Tan, Yan, 2023. "How does environmentally induced R&D affect carbon productivity? A government support perspective," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 942-961.
    19. So Yoon Yoon & Su Jung Jee & So Young Sohn, 2021. "Mapping and identifying technological coopetition: a multi-level approach," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 126(7), pages 5797-5817, July.
    20. Hua Cheng & Yinhong Yu & Shiyu Zhang, 2024. "Subsidies, green innovation, and the sustainable performance: evidence from heavy-polluting enterprises in China," Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, Springer;Association of Environmental Studies and Sciences, vol. 14(1), pages 102-116, March.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • C38 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Multiple or Simultaneous Equation Models; Multiple Variables - - - Classification Methdos; Cluster Analysis; Principal Components; Factor Analysis
    • C46 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric and Statistical Methods: Special Topics - - - Specific Distributions
    • G11 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Portfolio Choice; Investment Decisions
    • G12 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Asset Pricing; Trading Volume; Bond Interest Rates

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spt:admaec:v:15:y:2025:i:1:f:15_1_4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Eleftherios Spyromitros-Xioufis (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.scienpress.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.