IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/wirtsc/v93y2013i8p507-530.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Entwickeln sich wirtschaftswissenschaftliche Forschung und Politikberatung auseinander?

Author

Listed:
  • Justus Haucap
  • Michael Mödl
  • Christoph Schmidt
  • Nils Moore
  • Michael Themann
  • Wolfram Richter
  • Marcel Fratzscher
  • Gert Wagner
  • Werner Güth
  • Hartmut Kliemt
  • Willi Koll

Abstract

Most German economists show strong patterns of professional specialisation. In their work, they either focus on basic research or on policy consultancy. The evidence provided by Haucap und Mödl has been used to question work incentives in academia. The suggestion to change work incentives, however, is not supported by Richter, who rather calls into question the German tradition of research funding. He argues that Germany should devote more competitive funding to research projects and less to institutions. Schmidt et al. explore the question the other way around: do policy consultants publish in top journals? They conclude that they do. Güth/Kliemt show how precarious and limited our (technologically useful) knowledge is. The discussion of alternative policies among economic experts should be used to tease out the controversial arguments to allow for better informed political judgements. Wagner/Fratzscher take a historical view, showing that when modern economic research (and economic research institutes) apply a more pluralistic paradigm than that which prevailed in Germany for a long period after the Second World War, economic research will automatically have a more significant impact on politics, since policy advisors will produce more varied advice with the potential for realisation. Koll also claims that policy advice must not be based on a single supply-side oriented mainstream point of view. By drawing lessons from the crisis, economics must identify a new mainstream providing reliable guidance and policy advice. Copyright ZBW and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Suggested Citation

  • Justus Haucap & Michael Mödl & Christoph Schmidt & Nils Moore & Michael Themann & Wolfram Richter & Marcel Fratzscher & Gert Wagner & Werner Güth & Hartmut Kliemt & Willi Koll, 2013. "Entwickeln sich wirtschaftswissenschaftliche Forschung und Politikberatung auseinander?," Wirtschaftsdienst, Springer;German National Library of Economics, vol. 93(8), pages 507-530, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:wirtsc:v:93:y:2013:i:8:p:507-530
    DOI: 10.1007/s10273-013-1559-4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/s10273-013-1559-4
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Justus Haucap & Tobias Thomas & Gert G. Wagner, 2015. "Zu wenig Einfluss des ökonomischen Sachverstands? Empirische Befunde zum Einfluss von Ökonomen und anderen Wissenschaftlern auf die Wirtschaftspolitik," Discussion Papers of DIW Berlin 1449, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    A11; D78;

    JEL classification:

    • A11 - General Economics and Teaching - - General Economics - - - Role of Economics; Role of Economists
    • D78 - Microeconomics - - Analysis of Collective Decision-Making - - - Positive Analysis of Policy Formulation and Implementation

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:wirtsc:v:93:y:2013:i:8:p:507-530. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Sonal Shukla) or (Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.