IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/waterr/v39y2025i5d10.1007_s11269-025-04093-x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Review and Intercomparison of Machine Learning Applications for Short-term Flood Forecasting

Author

Listed:
  • Muhammad Asif

    (University of Basilicata)

  • Monique M. Kuglitsch

    (Fraunhofer Institute for Telecommunications, Heinrich Hertz Institute)

  • Ivanka Pelivan

    (Fraunhofer Institute for Telecommunications, Heinrich Hertz Institute)

  • Raffaele Albano

    (University of Basilicata)

Abstract

Among natural hazards, floods pose the greatest threat to lives and livelihoods. To reduce flood impacts, short-term flood forecasting can contribute to early warnings that provide communities with time to react. This manuscript explores how machine learning (ML) can support short-term flood forecasting. Using two methods [strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats (SWOT) and comparative performance analysis] for different forecast lead times (1–6, 6–12, 12–24, and 24–48 h), we evaluate the performance of machine learning models in 94 journal papers from 2001 to 2023. SWOT reveals that the best short-term flood forecasting was produced by hybrid, random forest (RF), long short-term memory (LSTM), artificial neural network (ANN), and adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system (ANFIS) approaches. The comparative performance analysis, meanwhile, favors convolutional neural network, ANFIS, multilayer perceptron, k-nearest neighbors algorithm (KNN), hybrid, LSTM, ANN, and support vector machine (SVM) at 1–6 h; hybrid, ANFIS, ANN, and LSTM at 6–12 h; SVM, hybrid, and RF at 12–24 h; and hybrid and RF at 24–48 h. In general, hybrid approaches consistently perform well across all lead times. Trends such as hybridization, model selection, input data selection, and decomposition seem to improve the accuracy of models. Furthermore, effective stand-alone ML models such as ANN, SVM, RF, genetic algorithm, KNN, and LSTM, provide better outcomes through hybridization with other ML models. By including different machine learning models and parameters such as environmental, socio-economical, and climatic parameters, the hybrid system can produce more accurate flood forecasting, making it more effective for early warning operational purposes.

Suggested Citation

  • Muhammad Asif & Monique M. Kuglitsch & Ivanka Pelivan & Raffaele Albano, 2025. "Review and Intercomparison of Machine Learning Applications for Short-term Flood Forecasting," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 39(5), pages 1971-1991, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:waterr:v:39:y:2025:i:5:d:10.1007_s11269-025-04093-x
    DOI: 10.1007/s11269-025-04093-x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11269-025-04093-x
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11269-025-04093-x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Anas Mahmood Al-Juboori, 2022. "Solving Complex Rainfall-Runoff Processes in Semi-Arid Regions Using Hybrid Heuristic Model," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 36(2), pages 717-728, January.
    2. Patience Mguni & Lise Herslund & Marina Bergen Jensen, 2016. "Sustainable urban drainage systems: examining the potential for green infrastructure-based stormwater management for Sub-Saharan cities," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 82(2), pages 241-257, June.
    3. Genia Nagara & Wei-Haur Lam & Nasha Lee & Faridah Othman & Md Shaaban, 2015. "Comparative SWOT Analysis for Water Solutions in Asia and Africa," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 29(1), pages 125-138, January.
    4. Adisa Hammed Akinsoji & Bashir Adelodun & Qudus Adeyi & Rahmon Abiodun Salau & Golden Odey & Kyung Sook Choi, 2024. "Integrating Machine Learning Models with Comprehensive Data Strategies and Optimization Techniques to Enhance Flood Prediction Accuracy: A Review," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 38(12), pages 4735-4761, September.
    5. Priyanka Sharma & Farshad Fathian & Deepesh Machiwal & S. R. Bhakar & Survey D. Sharma, 2024. "Comparison of Hybrid LSTAR-GARCH Model with Conventional Stochastic and Artificial-Intelligence Models to Estimate Monthly Streamflow," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 38(10), pages 3685-3705, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Syed Hammad Mian & Bashir Salah & Wadea Ameen & Khaja Moiduddin & Hisham Alkhalefah, 2020. "Adapting Universities for Sustainability Education in Industry 4.0: Channel of Challenges and Opportunities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-33, July.
    2. Tahia Tasnia & Anna Growe, 2025. "A Systematic Literature Review of Water-Sensitive Urban Design and Flood Risk Management in Contexts of Strategic Urban Sustainability Planning," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-24, January.
    3. Mohammadi, Kamran, 2023. "Improved strategy management for WDNs: Integrated prioritization SWOT QSPM (IPSQ) method – Application to passive defense," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    4. Deely, John & Hynes, Stephen & Barquín, José & Burgess, Diane & Finney, Graham & Silió, Ana & Álvarez-Martínez, Jose Manuel & Bailly, Denis & Ballé-Béganton, Johanna, 2020. "Barrier identification framework for the implementation of blue and green infrastructures," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    5. Amir Molajou & Vahid Nourani & Ali Davanlou Tajbakhsh & Hossein Akbari Variani & Mina Khosravi, 2024. "Multi-Step-Ahead Rainfall-Runoff Modeling: Decision Tree-Based Clustering for Hybrid Wavelet Neural- Networks Modeling," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 38(13), pages 5195-5214, October.
    6. Xueping Gao & Lingling Chen & Bowen Sun & Yinzhu Liu, 2017. "Employing SWOT Analysis and Normal Cloud Model for Water Resource Sustainable Utilization Assessment and Strategy Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(8), pages 1-23, August.
    7. Rui Yang & Yingwen Chen & Jie Zhong & Yujin Xu & Xin An, 2024. "A systematic knowledge pedigree analysis on green governance," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(6), pages 13611-13640, June.
    8. Rei Itsukushima & Yohei Ogahara & Yuki Iwanaga & Tatsuro Sato, 2018. "Investigating the Influence of Various Stormwater Runoff Control Facilities on Runoff Control Efficiency in a Small Catchment Area," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-12, February.
    9. Paul Smoke & Mitchell Cook, 2022. "Administrative Decentralization and Climate Change," World Bank Publications - Reports 36911, The World Bank Group.
    10. Farhana Islam & Monzur Alam Imteaz, 2022. "A Novel Hybrid Approach for Predicting Western Australia’s Seasonal Rainfall Variability," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 36(10), pages 3649-3672, August.
    11. Sikhululekile Ncube & Scott Arthur, 2021. "Influence of Blue-Green and Grey Infrastructure Combinations on Natural and Human-Derived Capital in Urban Drainage Planning," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-16, February.
    12. Thanaporn Supriyasilp & Kobkiat Pongput & Suree Boonyanupong & Teerawat Suwanlertcharoen, 2021. "Enhanced Water Management for Muang Fai Irrigation Systems through Remote Sensing and SWOT Analysis," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 35(1), pages 263-277, January.
    13. Simon Peter Muwafu & Louis Celliers & Jürgen Scheffran & María Máñez Costa, 2024. "Community Governance Performance of Nature-Based Solutions for Sustainable Urban Stormwater Management in Sub-Saharan Africa," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(19), pages 1-16, September.
    14. Amayaa Wijesinghe & Jessica P. R. Thorn, 2021. "Governance of Urban Green Infrastructure in Informal Settlements of Windhoek, Namibia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-25, August.
    15. Zhangjun Liu & Jingwen Zhang & Tianfu Wen & Jingqing Cheng, 2022. "Uncertainty Quantification of Rainfall-runoff Simulations Using the Copula-based Bayesian Processor: Impacts of Seasonality, Copula Selection and Correlation Coefficient," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 36(13), pages 4981-4993, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:waterr:v:39:y:2025:i:5:d:10.1007_s11269-025-04093-x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.