IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/waterr/v38y2024i2d10.1007_s11269-023-03690-y.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Machine Learning For Groundwater Quality Classification: A Step Towards Economic and Sustainable Groundwater Quality Assessment Process

Author

Listed:
  • Aymen Zegaar

    (Research Laboratory in Subterranean and Surface Hydraulics, Mohamed Khider University)

  • Samira Ounoki

    (Research Laboratory in Subterranean and Surface Hydraulics, Mohamed Khider University)

  • Abdelmoutia Telli

    (Mohamed Khider University)

Abstract

Evaluation of water quality is essential for protecting both the environment and human wellbeing. There is a paucity of research on using machine learning for classification of groundwater used for irrigation with fewer input parameters and still getting satisfactory results, despite earlier studies exploring its application in evaluating water quality. Studies are required to determine the feasibility of using machine learning to classify groundwater used for irrigation using minimal input parameters. In this study, we developed machine learning models to simulate the Irrigation Water Quality Index (IWQI) and an economic model that used an optimal number of inputs with the highest possible accuracy. We utilized eight classification algorithms, including the LightGBM classifier, CatBoost, Extra Trees, Random Forest, Gradient Boosting classifiers, Support Vector Machines, Multi-Layer Perceptrons, and K-Nearest Neighbors Algorithm. Two scenarios were considered, the first using six inputs, including conductivity, chloride ( $$\mathrm{Cl}^{-}$$ Cl - ), bicarbonate ( $$\mathrm{HCO}_3{}^{-}$$ HCO 3 - ), sodium ( $$\mathrm{Na}^{+}$$ Na + ), calcium ( $$\mathrm{Ca}^{2+}$$ Ca 2 + ), and magnesium ( $$\mathrm{Mg}^{2+}$$ Mg 2 + ), and the second using three parameters, including total hardness (TH), chloride ( $$\mathrm{Cl}^{-}$$ Cl - ), and sulfate ( $${\mathrm{SO}_4{}^{2-}}$$ SO 4 2 - ) that were selected based on the Mutual Information (MI) result. The models achieved satisfactory performance, with the LightGBM classifier as the best model, yielding a 91.08% F1 score using six inputs, and the Extra Trees classifier as the best model, yielding an 86.30% F1 score using three parameters. Our findings provide a valuable contribution to the development of accurate and efficient machine learning models for water quality evaluation.

Suggested Citation

  • Aymen Zegaar & Samira Ounoki & Abdelmoutia Telli, 2024. "Machine Learning For Groundwater Quality Classification: A Step Towards Economic and Sustainable Groundwater Quality Assessment Process," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 38(2), pages 621-637, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:waterr:v:38:y:2024:i:2:d:10.1007_s11269-023-03690-y
    DOI: 10.1007/s11269-023-03690-y
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11269-023-03690-y
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11269-023-03690-y?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mohammad Nikoo & Najmeh Mahjouri, 2013. "Water Quality Zoning Using Probabilistic Support Vector Machines and Self-Organizing Maps," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 27(7), pages 2577-2594, May.
    2. Dimitris Alexakis & Vassiliοs A. Tsihrintzis & George Tsakiris & Georgios D. Gikas, 2016. "Suitability of Water Quality Indices for Application in Lakes in the Mediterranean," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 30(5), pages 1621-1633, March.
    3. Katarzyna Pietrucha-Urbanik & Janusz R. Rak, 2020. "Consumers’ Perceptions of the Supply of Tap Water in Crisis Situations," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-20, July.
    4. Dimitris Alexakis & Vassiliοs Tsihrintzis & George Tsakiris & Georgios Gikas, 2016. "Suitability of Water Quality Indices for Application in Lakes in the Mediterranean," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 30(5), pages 1621-1633, March.
    5. Asit K. Biswas & Cecilia Tortajada, 2019. "Water quality management: a globally neglected issue," International Journal of Water Resources Development, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(6), pages 913-916, November.
    6. Fereshteh Modaresi & Shahab Araghinejad, 2014. "A Comparative Assessment of Support Vector Machines, Probabilistic Neural Networks, and K-Nearest Neighbor Algorithms for Water Quality Classification," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 28(12), pages 4095-4111, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Margaret W. Gitau & Jingqiu Chen & Zhao Ma, 2016. "Water Quality Indices as Tools for Decision Making and Management," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 30(8), pages 2591-2610, June.
    2. Nastaran Chitsaz & Ali Azarnivand, 2017. "Water Scarcity Management in Arid Regions Based on an Extended Multiple Criteria Technique," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 31(1), pages 233-250, January.
    3. Jingjing Xia & Gaohong Xu & Ping Guo & Hong Peng & Xu Zhang & Yonggui Wang & Wanshun Zhang, 2018. "Tempo-Spatial Analysis of Water Quality in the Three Gorges Reservoir, China, after its 175-m Experimental Impoundment," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 32(9), pages 2937-2954, July.
    4. J. Yazdi & A . Moridi, 2017. "Interactive Reservoir-Watershed Modeling Framework for Integrated Water Quality Management," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 31(7), pages 2105-2125, May.
    5. Mehrdad Ghorbani Mooselu & Hamid Amiri & Sama Azadi & Helge Liltved, 2022. "Spatiotemporal assessment of surface water vulnerability to road construction," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(6), pages 7851-7873, June.
    6. Fereshteh Modaresi & Shahab Araghinejad & Kumars Ebrahimi, 2018. "A Comparative Assessment of Artificial Neural Network, Generalized Regression Neural Network, Least-Square Support Vector Regression, and K-Nearest Neighbor Regression for Monthly Streamflow Forecasti," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 32(1), pages 243-258, January.
    7. Onur Genç & Ali Dağ, 2016. "A machine learning-based approach to predict the velocity profiles in small streams," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 30(1), pages 43-61, January.
    8. Katarzyna Pietrucha-Urbanik & Barbara Tchórzewska-Cieślak & Mohamed Eid, 2021. "A Case Study in View of Developing Predictive Models for Water Supply System Management," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-25, June.
    9. V. Gholami & M. R. Khaleghi & S. Pirasteh & Martijn J. Booij, 2022. "Comparison of Self-Organizing Map, Artificial Neural Network, and Co-Active Neuro-Fuzzy Inference System Methods in Simulating Groundwater Quality: Geospatial Artificial Intelligence," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 36(2), pages 451-469, January.
    10. Jian Chang & Wanhua Li & Yaodong Zhou & Peng Zhang & Hengxin Zhang, 2022. "Impact of Public Service Quality on the Efficiency of the Water Industry: Evidence from 147 Cities in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-17, November.
    11. Barbara Tchórzewska-Cieślak & Katarzyna Pietrucha-Urbanik & Emilia Kuliczkowska, 2020. "An Approach to Analysing Water Consumers’ Acceptance of Risk-Reduction Costs," Resources, MDPI, vol. 9(11), pages 1-16, November.
    12. Sharma, Rajesh & Sinha, Avik & Kautish, Pradeep, 2020. "Does renewable energy consumption reduce ecological footprint? Evidence from eight developing countries of Asia," MPRA Paper 104277, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 2020.
    13. Donglin Dong & Wenjie Sun & Zhaochang Zhu & Sha Xi & Gang Lin, 2013. "Groundwater Risk Assessment of the Third Aquifer in Tianjin City, China," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 27(8), pages 3179-3190, June.
    14. Vincent Paul Obade & Rattan Lal & Richard Moore, 2014. "Assessing the Accuracy of Soil and Water Quality Characterization Using Remote Sensing," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 28(14), pages 5091-5109, November.
    15. Shiguo Xu & Tianxiang Wang & Suduan Hu, 2015. "Dynamic Assessment of Water Quality Based on a Variable Fuzzy Pattern Recognition Model," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-19, February.
    16. Chandrashekhar Bhuiyan & Prashant Kumar Champati Ray, 2017. "Groundwater Quality Zoning in the Perspective of Health Hazards," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 31(1), pages 251-267, January.
    17. Haris Doukas & Panos Xidonas & Nikos Mastromichalakis, 2022. "How Successful are Energy Efficiency Investments? A Comparative Analysis for Classification & Performance Prediction," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 59(2), pages 579-598, February.
    18. Yijie Wang & Lei Xie & Shuang Li, 2022. "The Use of Intergroup Social Comparison in Promoting Water Conservation: Evidence from a Survey Experiment in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(13), pages 1-14, June.
    19. Onur Genç & Ali Dağ, 2016. "A machine learning-based approach to predict the velocity profiles in small streams," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 30(1), pages 43-61, January.
    20. Józef Ober & Janusz Karwot, 2021. "Tap Water Quality: Seasonal User Surveys in Poland," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-22, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:waterr:v:38:y:2024:i:2:d:10.1007_s11269-023-03690-y. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.