IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/stpapr/v55y2014i1p157-167.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Qualitative robustness of von Mises statistics based on strongly mixing data

Author

Listed:
  • Henryk Zähle

Abstract

In this article, the property of qualitative robustness is studied for von Mises statistics in the situation where the observations are not necessarily independent but are drawn from a strongly mixing sequence of identically distributed random variables. The notion of qualitative robustness is taken from “Zähle ( 2012 , submitted)” where Huber’s version of Hampel’s original definition was adapted to the case of dependent observations. The main result is illustrated by means of several examples including the sample variance, the sample Gini’s mean difference and the Cramér–von Mises statistic. Copyright Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

Suggested Citation

  • Henryk Zähle, 2014. "Qualitative robustness of von Mises statistics based on strongly mixing data," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 55(1), pages 157-167, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:stpapr:v:55:y:2014:i:1:p:157-167
    DOI: 10.1007/s00362-012-0478-6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/s00362-012-0478-6
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s00362-012-0478-6?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Qiying, Wang, 1995. "The strong law of U-statistics with [phi]*-mixing samples," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 23(2), pages 151-155, May.
    2. Beutner, Eric & Wu, Wei Biao & Zähle, Henryk, 2012. "Asymptotics for statistical functionals of long-memory sequences," Stochastic Processes and their Applications, Elsevier, vol. 122(3), pages 910-929.
    3. Dehling, Herold & Wendler, Martin, 2010. "Central limit theorem and the bootstrap for U-statistics of strongly mixing data," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 101(1), pages 126-137, January.
    4. Krätschmer, Volker & Schied, Alexander & Zähle, Henryk, 2012. "Qualitative and infinitesimal robustness of tail-dependent statistical functionals," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 103(1), pages 35-47, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Krätschmer Volker & Schied Alexander & Zähle Henryk, 2015. "Quasi-Hadamard differentiability of general risk functionals and its application," Statistics & Risk Modeling, De Gruyter, vol. 32(1), pages 25-47, April.
    2. Dehling, Herold G. & Sharipov, Olimjon Sh., 2009. "Marcinkiewicz-Zygmund strong laws for U-statistics of weakly dependent observations," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 79(19), pages 2028-2036, October.
    3. Carole Bernard & Ludger Rüschendorf & Steven Vanduffel & Ruodu Wang, 2017. "Risk bounds for factor models," Finance and Stochastics, Springer, vol. 21(3), pages 631-659, July.
    4. Lazar, Emese & Zhang, Ning, 2019. "Model risk of expected shortfall," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 74-93.
    5. Giuseppe Cavaliere & Dimitris N. Politis & Anders Rahbek & Paul Doukhan & Gabriel Lang & Anne Leucht & Michael H. Neumann, 2015. "Recent developments in bootstrap methods for dependent data," Journal of Time Series Analysis, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 36(3), pages 290-314, May.
    6. Bellini, Fabio & Klar, Bernhard & Müller, Alfred & Rosazza Gianin, Emanuela, 2014. "Generalized quantiles as risk measures," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 41-48.
    7. Jan Obloj & Johannes Wiesel, 2018. "Robust estimation of superhedging prices," Papers 1807.04211, arXiv.org, revised Apr 2020.
    8. Zähle, Henryk, 2016. "A definition of qualitative robustness for general point estimators, and examples," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 143(C), pages 12-31.
    9. Fissler Tobias & Ziegel Johanna F., 2021. "On the elicitability of range value at risk," Statistics & Risk Modeling, De Gruyter, vol. 38(1-2), pages 25-46, January.
    10. Hwang, Eunju & Shin, Dong Wan, 2012. "Strong consistency of the stationary bootstrap under ψ-weak dependence," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 82(3), pages 488-495.
    11. Koch-Medina Pablo & Munari Cosimo, 2014. "Law-invariant risk measures: Extension properties and qualitative robustness," Statistics & Risk Modeling, De Gruyter, vol. 31(3-4), pages 1-22, December.
    12. James Ming Chen, 2018. "On Exactitude in Financial Regulation: Value-at-Risk, Expected Shortfall, and Expectiles," Risks, MDPI, vol. 6(2), pages 1-28, June.
    13. Mario Ghossoub & Jesse Hall & David Saunders, 2020. "Maximum Spectral Measures of Risk with given Risk Factor Marginal Distributions," Papers 2010.14673, arXiv.org.
    14. Tino Werner, 2022. "Asymptotic linear expansion of regularized M-estimators," Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Springer;The Institute of Statistical Mathematics, vol. 74(1), pages 167-194, February.
    15. Marta Cousido-Rocha & Jacobo Uña-Álvarez & Jeffrey D. Hart, 2019. "Testing equality of a large number of densities under mixing conditions," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 28(4), pages 1203-1228, December.
    16. Dehling, Herold & Sharipov, Olimjon Sh. & Wendler, Martin, 2015. "Bootstrap for dependent Hilbert space-valued random variables with application to von Mises statistics," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 200-215.
    17. Rossello, Damiano, 2015. "Ranking of investment funds: Acceptability versus robustness," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 245(3), pages 828-836.
    18. Paul Embrechts & Bin Wang & Ruodu Wang, 2015. "Aggregation-robustness and model uncertainty of regulatory risk measures," Finance and Stochastics, Springer, vol. 19(4), pages 763-790, October.
    19. Krätschmer, Volker & Schied, Alexander & Zähle, Henryk, 2017. "Domains of weak continuity of statistical functionals with a view toward robust statistics," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 158(C), pages 1-19.
    20. Tobias Fissler & Johanna F. Ziegel, 2019. "Evaluating Range Value at Risk Forecasts," Papers 1902.04489, arXiv.org, revised Nov 2020.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:stpapr:v:55:y:2014:i:1:p:157-167. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.