IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/snopef/v4y2023i4d10.1007_s43069-023-00251-2.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparing Optimization Methods for Radiation Therapy Patient Scheduling using Different Objectives

Author

Listed:
  • Sara Frimodig

    (KTH Royal Institute of Technology
    RaySearch Laboratories)

  • Per Enqvist

    (KTH Royal Institute of Technology)

  • Mats Carlsson

    (RISE Research Institutes of Sweden)

  • Carole Mercier

    (Iridium Netwerk)

Abstract

Radiation therapy (RT) is a medical treatment to kill cancer cells or shrink tumors. To manually schedule patients for RT is a time-consuming and challenging task. By the use of optimization, patient schedules for RT can be created automatically. This paper presents a study of different optimization methods for modeling and solving the RT patient scheduling problem, which can be used as decision support when implementing an automatic scheduling algorithm in practice. We introduce an Integer Programming (IP) model, a column generation IP model (CG-IP), and a Constraint Programming model. Patients are scheduled on multiple machine types considering their priority for treatment, session duration and allowed machines. Expected future arrivals of urgent patients are included in the models as placeholder patients. Since different cancer centers can have different scheduling objectives, the models are compared using multiple objective functions, including minimizing waiting times, and maximizing the fulfillment of patients’ preferences for treatment times. The test data is generated from historical data from Iridium Netwerk, Belgium’s largest cancer center with 10 linear accelerators. The results demonstrate that the CG-IP model can solve all the different problem instances to a mean optimality gap of less than $$1\%$$ 1 % within one hour. The proposed methodology provides a tool for automated scheduling of RT treatments and can be generally applied to RT centers.

Suggested Citation

  • Sara Frimodig & Per Enqvist & Mats Carlsson & Carole Mercier, 2023. "Comparing Optimization Methods for Radiation Therapy Patient Scheduling using Different Objectives," SN Operations Research Forum, Springer, vol. 4(4), pages 1-38, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:snopef:v:4:y:2023:i:4:d:10.1007_s43069-023-00251-2
    DOI: 10.1007/s43069-023-00251-2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s43069-023-00251-2
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s43069-023-00251-2?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:snopef:v:4:y:2023:i:4:d:10.1007_s43069-023-00251-2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.