IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/scient/v130y2025i4d10.1007_s11192-025-05266-6.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

On the credibility of QS and THE ranking by subject area: misalignment of subject mapping to academic disciplines

Author

Listed:
  • Hussam Alshraideh

    (The American University of Sharjah
    Jordan University of Science and Technology)

  • Mohamed Abdelgawad

    (The American University of Sharjah
    Assiut University)

Abstract

In this study, we point the attention to some inaccuracies in the mapping between the journal subject classification by Elsevier and the narrow subject field used by QS (Quacquarelli Symonds) and THE (Times Higher Education) in their World University Rankings by subject. We noticed that inaccuracies in this mapping will result in classifying some publications under far disciplines, rendering the announced subject ranking inaccurate. To give an example of these inaccuracies, publications on fuel technology, nuclear engineering, and all energy-related studies are classified under Civil Engineering in THE ranking and under Electrical and Electronics Engineering under the QS ranking. This is completely unfair as many of these studies are conducted by researchers in Mechanical or Chemical engineering disciplines. To demonstrate the effect of this erroneous mapping on the final ranking, we obtained the publications data for 13 institutions from the top 20 institutions in the Arab World from 2017 to 021 and their citations until mid-2022 as indexed in Scopus. Following QS and THE subject ranking methodology, we then re-ranked these institutions based on citations per paper and h-index indicators based on a modified subject mapping suggested by a sample of 12 faculty members from 6 different engineering departments at the authors’ institution. We found that the new ranking differed considerably from the one calculated by QS and THE based on their controversial subject mapping. Many institutions (sometimes 10 out of 13) had their rank change in some subject areas with the rank of some institutions dropping 6 ranks out of 13 in some cases! We believe this study sheds light on the inaccuracies in subject rankings and the importance of coming up with a unified subject mapping to be used by the different ranking bodies.

Suggested Citation

  • Hussam Alshraideh & Mohamed Abdelgawad, 2025. "On the credibility of QS and THE ranking by subject area: misalignment of subject mapping to academic disciplines," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 130(4), pages 2237-2272, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:scient:v:130:y:2025:i:4:d:10.1007_s11192-025-05266-6
    DOI: 10.1007/s11192-025-05266-6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11192-025-05266-6
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11192-025-05266-6?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:scient:v:130:y:2025:i:4:d:10.1007_s11192-025-05266-6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.