IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/scient/v128y2023i2d10.1007_s11192-022-04565-6.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Retraction of Predatory publishing in Scopus: evidence on cross-country differences lacks justification

Author

Listed:
  • Giovanni Abramo

    (National Research Council of Italy)

  • Isidro F. Aguillo

    (CSIC)

  • Dag W. Aksnes

    (NIFU - Nordic Institute for Studies in Innovation, Research and Education)

  • Kevin Boyack

    (SciTech Strategies, Inc.)

  • Quentin L. Burrell

    (University of Manchester)

  • Juan Miguel Campanario

    (Universidad de Alcalá)

  • Zaida Chinchilla-Rodríguez

    (CSIC)

  • Rodrigo Costas

    (Leiden University)

  • Ciriaco Andrea D’Angelo

    (University of Rome “Tor Vergata”)

  • Anne-Wil Harzing

    (Middlesex University)

  • Hamid R. Jamali

    (Charles Sturt University)

  • Vincent Larivière

    (Université de Montréal)

  • Loet Leydesdorff

    (University of Amsterdam)

  • Marc Luwel

    (Leiden University)

  • Ben Martin

    (University of Sussex)

  • Philipp Mayr

    (GESIS - Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences)

  • Katherine W. McCain

    (Drexel University)

  • Isabella Peters

    (ZBW - Leibniz-Information Center for Economics)

  • Ismael Rafols

    (Leiden University
    University of Sussex)

  • Nicolas Robinson-Garcia

    (University of Granada)

  • Torben Schubert

    (Fraunhofer ISI
    Lund University)

  • Henry Small

    (SciTech Strategies, Inc.)

  • Cassidy R. Sugimoto

    (Georgia Institute of Technology)

  • Mike Thelwall

    (University of Wolverhampton)

  • Peter den Besselaar

    (Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam)

  • Thed Leeuwen

    (Leiden University)

  • Ludo Waltman

    (Leiden University)

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Giovanni Abramo & Isidro F. Aguillo & Dag W. Aksnes & Kevin Boyack & Quentin L. Burrell & Juan Miguel Campanario & Zaida Chinchilla-Rodríguez & Rodrigo Costas & Ciriaco Andrea D’Angelo & Anne-Wil Harz, 2023. "Retraction of Predatory publishing in Scopus: evidence on cross-country differences lacks justification," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 128(2), pages 1459-1461, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:scient:v:128:y:2023:i:2:d:10.1007_s11192-022-04565-6
    DOI: 10.1007/s11192-022-04565-6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11192-022-04565-6
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11192-022-04565-6?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Vít Macháček & Martin Srholec, 2021. "RETRACTED ARTICLE: Predatory publishing in Scopus: evidence on cross-country differences," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 126(3), pages 1897-1921, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Giovanni Abramo & Ciriaco Andrea D’Angelo & Myroslava Hladchenko, 2023. "Assessing the effects of publication requirements for professorship on research performance and publishing behaviour of Ukrainian academics," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 128(8), pages 4589-4609, August.
    2. Jaime A. Teixeira da Silva & Daniel J. Dunleavy & Mina Moradzadeh & Joshua Eykens, 2021. "A credit-like rating system to determine the legitimacy of scientific journals and publishers," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 126(10), pages 8589-8616, October.
    3. Hengky Latan & Charbel Jose Chiappetta Jabbour & Ana Beatriz Lopes de Sousa Jabbour & Murad Ali, 2023. "Crossing the Red Line? Empirical Evidence and Useful Recommendations on Questionable Research Practices among Business Scholars," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 184(3), pages 549-569, May.
    4. Renata Kudaibergenova & Sandugash Uzakbay & Asselya Makanova & Kymbat Ramadinkyzy & Erlan Kistaubayev & Ruslan Dussekeev & Kadyrzhan Smagulov, 2022. "Managing publication change at Al-Farabi Kazakh National University: a case study," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 127(1), pages 453-479, January.
    5. Balatskiy, E. & Yurevich, M., 2021. "Russian economic science on the international market of "predatory" publications," Journal of the New Economic Association, New Economic Association, vol. 50(2), pages 190-198.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:scient:v:128:y:2023:i:2:d:10.1007_s11192-022-04565-6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.