IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/qualqt/v59y2025i2d10.1007_s11135-024-02044-z.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Countries pushing the boundaries of knowledge: the USA’s dominance, China’s rise, and the EU’s stagnation

Author

Listed:
  • Alonso Rodríguez-Navarro

    (Universidad Politécnica de Madrid
    Universidad Complutense de Madrid)

Abstract

Knowing which countries contribute the most to pushing the boundaries of knowledge in science and technology has social and political importance. However, common citation metrics do not adequately measure this contribution. A more stringent metric is needed—one that accurately captures the influence of breakthrough papers that are very highly cited but very rare. The recently described Rk-index was specifically designed to address this issue by being equivalent to the number of highly cited papers in narrow top percentiles, such as 0.1% or 0.01%. I applied this index to 25 countries and the EU across 10 key research topics—five technological and five biomedical—during the 2014–2017 period, studying domestic and international collaborative papers independently. In technological topics, the Rk-indices of domestic papers show that overall, the USA, China, and the EU are leaders, with other countries lagging behind. The USA is notably ahead of China, while the EU is far behind China. The same approach to biomedical topics reveals the overwhelming dominance of the USA, with the EU ahead of China. The analysis of internationally collaborative papers further demonstrates the USA’s dominance. A further study of the USA, China, and the EU in the 2004–2007 and 2009–2012 periods confirms the sustained dominance of the USA, the significant progress made by China in certain topics, and the overall stagnation of the EU. These results differ from current country rankings based on less stringent indicators.

Suggested Citation

  • Alonso Rodríguez-Navarro, 2025. "Countries pushing the boundaries of knowledge: the USA’s dominance, China’s rise, and the EU’s stagnation," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 59(2), pages 1861-1878, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:qualqt:v:59:y:2025:i:2:d:10.1007_s11135-024-02044-z
    DOI: 10.1007/s11135-024-02044-z
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11135-024-02044-z
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11135-024-02044-z?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:qualqt:v:59:y:2025:i:2:d:10.1007_s11135-024-02044-z. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.