IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/pharme/v40y2022i3d10.1007_s40273-021-01124-4.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Public Preferences for a COVID-19 Vaccination Program in Quebec: A Discrete Choice Experiment

Author

Listed:
  • Gabin F. Morillon

    (University of Montreal
    Centre de recherche de l’Institut universitaire en santé mentale de Montréal, CIUSSS de l’Est de l’île de Montréal
    Centre interuniversitaire de recherche en analyse des organisations)

  • Thomas G. Poder

    (University of Montreal
    Centre de recherche de l’Institut universitaire en santé mentale de Montréal, CIUSSS de l’Est de l’île de Montréal
    Centre interuniversitaire de recherche en analyse des organisations)

Abstract

Objectives We aimed to elicit preferences of the French-speaking Quebec population regarding a COVID-19 vaccination program and to characterize individuals with respect to their vaccination behaviors. Methods A discrete choice experiment was conducted in Autumn 2020 via a web-based survey. Its design included seven attributes: vaccine origin, vaccine effectiveness, side effects, protection duration, priority population, waiting time to get vaccinated, and recommender of the vaccine. Utilities were estimated using a mixed-logit model and a latent class logit model. Results Our sample included 1599 individuals. From this total, 119 always chose the opt-out option (7.4%). According to the mixed-logit model, the relative weights of attributes were as follows: effectiveness (28.48%), side effects (23.68%), protection duration (17.41%), vaccine origin (12.75%), recommender (11.96%), waiting time to get vaccinated (3.62%), and priority population (2.11%). Five classes were derived from the latent class logit model. Class 1 (9.13%) wanted to get vaccinated as fast as possible and was composed of uncertain and more vulnerable individuals. Class 5 (25.14%) was similar to the full sample, mostly favoring vaccination. Classes 2 (7.69%) and 4 (15.82%) included “vaccine hesitant and demanding” individuals but were different in their sociodemographic profiles. Finally, “anti-vaccine” and other “vaccine hesitant” individuals were in class 3 (42.21%). Conclusions This study showed the vaccine characteristics that are likely to improve vaccine uptake, which may more easily lead to herd immunity. Different profiles of respondents also showed various levels of acceptance toward a COVID-19 vaccination program, which may help to better understand vaccine hesitancy behaviors.

Suggested Citation

  • Gabin F. Morillon & Thomas G. Poder, 2022. "Public Preferences for a COVID-19 Vaccination Program in Quebec: A Discrete Choice Experiment," PharmacoEconomics, Springer, vol. 40(3), pages 341-354, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:pharme:v:40:y:2022:i:3:d:10.1007_s40273-021-01124-4
    DOI: 10.1007/s40273-021-01124-4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40273-021-01124-4
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s40273-021-01124-4?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yulan Lin & Zhijian Hu & Qinjian Zhao & Haridah Alias & Mahmoud Danaee & Li Ping Wong, 2020. "Understanding COVID-19 vaccine demand and hesitancy: A nationwide online survey in China," PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(12), pages 1-22, December.
    2. Benjamin Matthew Craig, 2021. "United States COVID-19 Vaccination Preferences (CVP): 2020 Hindsight," The Patient: Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Springer;International Academy of Health Preference Research, vol. 14(3), pages 309-318, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Samar Abd ElHafeez & Iffat Elbarazi & Ramy Shaaban & Rony ElMakhzangy & Maged Ossama Aly & Amr Alnagar & Mohamed Yacoub & Haider M El Saeh & Nashwa Eltaweel & Sulafa T Alqutub & Ramy Mohamed Ghazy, 2021. "Arabic validation and cross-cultural adaptation of the 5C scale for assessment of COVID-19 vaccines psychological antecedents," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(8), pages 1-18, August.
    2. Takeshi Yoda & Nagisa Iwasaki & Hironobu Katsuyama, 2023. "Willingness to Pay for COVID-19 Vaccines in Japan," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(22), pages 1-11, November.
    3. Abayomi Samuel Oyekale, 2021. "Willingness to Take COVID-19 Vaccines in Ethiopia: An Instrumental Variable Probit Approach," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(17), pages 1-11, August.
    4. Griffin, Bethany & Conner, Mark & Norman, Paul, 2022. "Applying an extended protection motivation theory to predict Covid-19 vaccination intentions and uptake in 50–64 year olds in the UK," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 298(C).
    5. Chiara Achangwa & Tae-Jun Lee & Moo-Sik Lee, 2021. "Acceptance of the COVID-19 Vaccine by Foreigners in South Korea," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(22), pages 1-12, November.
    6. Fanny Velardo & Verity Watson & Pierre Arwidson & François Alla & Stéphane Luchini & Michaël Schwarzinger, 2021. "Regional Differences in COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy in December 2020: A Natural Experiment in the French Working-Age Population," Post-Print hal-03513452, HAL.
    7. Rubeena Zakar & Ain ul Momina & Ruhma Shahzad & Sara Shahzad & Mahwish Hayee & Muhammad Zakria Zakar & Florian Fischer, 2022. "COVID-19 Vaccination Acceptance in the Context of the Health Belief Model: Comparative Cross-Sectional Study in Punjab, Pakistan," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(19), pages 1-14, October.
    8. Rachael L. DiSantostefano & Fern Terris-Prestholt, 2021. "Using Societal Values to Inform Public Health Policy During the COVID-19 Pandemic: The Role of Health Preference Research," The Patient: Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Springer;International Academy of Health Preference Research, vol. 14(3), pages 303-307, May.
    9. Haghani, Milad & Bliemer, Michiel C.J. & de Bekker-Grob, Esther W., 2022. "Applications of discrete choice experiments in COVID-19 research: Disparity in survey qualities between health and transport fields," Journal of choice modelling, Elsevier, vol. 44(C).
    10. Hess, Stephane & Lancsar, Emily & Mariel, Petr & Meyerhoff, Jürgen & Song, Fangqing & van den Broek-Altenburg, Eline & Alaba, Olufunke A. & Amaris, Gloria & Arellana, Julián & Basso, Leonardo J. & Ben, 2022. "The path towards herd immunity: Predicting COVID-19 vaccination uptake through results from a stated choice study across six continents," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 298(C).
    11. Kristijonas Puteikis & Rūta Mameniškienė, 2021. "Factors Associated with COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy among People with Epilepsy in Lithuania," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(8), pages 1-9, April.
    12. Ravichandran Moorthy & Sarjit S. Gill & Sivapalan Selvadurai & Angelina Gurunathan, 2022. "Vaccine Justice and Bioethical Reflections of COVID-19 Immunization in Malaysia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-15, October.
    13. Alessandro Sapienza & Rino Falcone, 2022. "The Role of Trust in COVID-19 Vaccine Acceptance: Considerations from a Systematic Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(1), pages 1-17, December.
    14. Davaalkham Dambadarjaa & Gan-Erdene Altankhuyag & Unurtesteg Chandaga & Ser-Od Khuyag & Bilegt Batkhorol & Nansalmaa Khaidav & Oyunbileg Dulamsuren & Nadmidtseren Gombodorj & Avirmed Dorjsuren & Prami, 2021. "Factors Associated with COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy in Mongolia: A Web-Based Cross-Sectional Survey," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(24), pages 1-13, December.
    15. Antonio Rosa de Sousa Neto & Ana Raquel Batista de Carvalho & Márcia Daiane Ferreira da Silva & Marly Marques Rêgo Neta & Inara Viviane de Oliveira Sena & Rosângela Nunes Almeida & Francidalma Soares , 2023. "Bibliometric Analysis of Global Scientific Production on COVID-19 and Vaccines," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(6), pages 1-14, March.
    16. Aloyce R. Kaliba & Donald R. Andrews, 2023. "The Impact of Meso-Level Factors on SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine Early Hesitancy in the United States," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(13), pages 1-27, July.
    17. Weixin Zhang & Xin Shen & Ting Li & Nan Li & Yanyan Sun & Siyu Zhu & Nana Liu & Huifang Song & Kun Tang & Yujia Wang & Ying Zhang & Hui Cao & Yibo Wu & Yong Gan & Xinyao Zhang, 2022. "Intention to Pay for Vaccination and Influencing Factors of General Residents: A National Cross-Sectional Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(18), pages 1-9, September.
    18. Chiang, Chun-Fang & Kuo, Jason & Liu, Jin-Tan, 2022. "Cueing quality: Unpacking country-of-origin effects on intentions to vaccinate against COVID-19 in Taiwan," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 314(C).
    19. Meng Wang & Mengying Li & Xinghui Li & Xiaoli Chen & Feng Jiang & Kezhong A & Zhiguo Wang & Liping Zhang & Yihan Lu & Wenjia Peng & Weibing Wang & Chaowei Fu & Ying Wang, 2022. "Intention and Attitude to Accept a Pertussis Cocooning Vaccination among Chinese Children’s Guardians: A Cross-Sectional Survey," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(23), pages 1-12, December.
    20. Phi-Hung Nguyen & Jung-Fa Tsai & Ming-Hua Lin & Yi-Chung Hu, 2021. "A Hybrid Model with Spherical Fuzzy-AHP, PLS-SEM and ANN to Predict Vaccination Intention against COVID-19," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(23), pages 1-26, November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:pharme:v:40:y:2022:i:3:d:10.1007_s40273-021-01124-4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.