IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/patien/v10y2017i2d10.1007_s40271-016-0202-z.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Latent Class Analysis to Identify Variation in Caregivers’ Preferences for their Child’s Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Treatment: Do Stated Preferences Match Current Treatment?

Author

Listed:
  • Xinyi Ng

    (University of Maryland School of Pharmacy)

  • John F. P. Bridges

    (Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health)

  • Melissa M. Ross

    (University of Maryland School of Pharmacy)

  • Emily Frosch

    (Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine)

  • Gloria Reeves

    (University of Maryland School of Medicine)

  • Charles E. Cunningham

    (McMaster University)

  • Susan dosReis

    (University of Maryland School of Pharmacy)

Abstract

Objectives To investigate variation in caregiver preferences for their child’s attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) care and to determine if their stated preferences align with current care management. Methods Caregivers of a child aged 4–14 years and in care for ADHD were recruited from pediatric outpatient clinics and advocacy groups across the state of Maryland. Participants completed a survey collecting demographics, the child’s treatment, and caregiver preferences—elicited using a best-worst scaling experiment (case 2). Latent class analysis was used to identify distinct preference segments and bivariate analyses were used to compare the association between segment membership with what the child was currently receiving for their ADHD. Results Participants (n = 184) were predominantly White (68%) and the child’s mother (84%). Most children had ADHD for 2 or more years (79%). Caregiver preferences were distinguished by two segments: continuous medication (36%) and minimal medication (64%). The two groups had very different preferences for when medication was administered (p 0.05 for the caregiver behavior training, provider communication, provider specialty, and out-of-pocket costs). One third of the sample did not receive the preferred individualized education program and 42% of the minimal medication group reported using medication 7 days a week all year round. Conclusions Although behavior management training and school accommodations aspects of an ADHD care plan are more important to caregivers than evidence-based medication, fewer families had access to educational accommodations. Further research is needed to clarify how stated preferences for care align with treatments used in actual practice settings.

Suggested Citation

  • Xinyi Ng & John F. P. Bridges & Melissa M. Ross & Emily Frosch & Gloria Reeves & Charles E. Cunningham & Susan dosReis, 2017. "A Latent Class Analysis to Identify Variation in Caregivers’ Preferences for their Child’s Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Treatment: Do Stated Preferences Match Current Treatment?," The Patient: Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Springer;International Academy of Health Preference Research, vol. 10(2), pages 251-262, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:patien:v:10:y:2017:i:2:d:10.1007_s40271-016-0202-z
    DOI: 10.1007/s40271-016-0202-z
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40271-016-0202-z
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s40271-016-0202-z?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bussing, Regina & Schoenberg, Nancy E. & Perwien, Amy R., 1998. "Knowledge and information about ADHD: Evidence of cultural differences among African-American and white parents," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 46(7), pages 919-928, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Aizaki, Hideo & Fogarty, James, 2019. "An R package and tutorial for case 2 best–worst scaling," Journal of choice modelling, Elsevier, vol. 32(C), pages 1-1.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Aronson, Brian, 2016. "Peer influence as a potential magnifier of ADHD diagnosis," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 168(C), pages 111-119.
    2. Bussing, Regina & E Koro-Ljungberg, Mirka & Williamson, Pamela & Gary, Faye A. & Wilson Garvan, Cynthia, 2006. "What "Dr. Mom" ordered: A community-based exploratory study of parental self-care responses to children's ADHD symptoms," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 63(4), pages 871-882, August.
    3. Susan dosReis & Xinyi Ng & Emily Frosch & Gloria Reeves & Charles Cunningham & John Bridges, 2015. "Using Best–Worst Scaling to Measure Caregiver Preferences for Managing their Child’s ADHD: A Pilot Study," The Patient: Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Springer;International Academy of Health Preference Research, vol. 8(5), pages 423-431, October.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:patien:v:10:y:2017:i:2:d:10.1007_s40271-016-0202-z. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.