IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/operea/v25y2025i2d10.1007_s12351-025-00942-0.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Soft computing-based new dynamic intuitionistic fuzzy group decision analysis for risk evaluation in BOT highway construction projects

Author

Listed:
  • Mohsen Nezami

    (Islamic Azad University)

  • Hossein Gitinavard

    (Shahid Beheshti University)

  • Amir Ebrahimi Zade

    (Shahid Bahonar University of Kerman)

Abstract

In today's world, one of the most important and fundamental issues for developed and developing countries is related to construction and investment in infrastructure projects. One of the problems facing such projects is the risks involved in the project, despite which governments suffer a great deal at a macro level. In this situation, the appropriate and optimal proposal is to use the companies in the private sector under the title of Build-Operate-Transfer (BOT) projects, which accepts all the risks of the project and designs, builds and executes the final project, and after construction, delivers the final product. The government gives the final products and starts to use it with other persons in the country. In this paper, BOT projects under conditions of uncertainty are studied based on dynamic intuitionistic fuzzy (DIF) approach dynamically in two time periods and present an appropriate decision-making approach. As mentioned, in this article, two time periods have been used, the reason for which has been the proper use of two different conditions and the analysis of the problem under study in two different situations. For example, with the occurrence of sanctions in a country, the type of investment in that country changes and the performance of the manufacturer also changes, and for this purpose, it is very important to analyze the issue in the two times before the sanctions and at the same time. For this purpose and raising the view of the problem from the real-world situation, the problem has been studied in two time periods. The proposed method is constructed based on the two main weighting calculation approaches. The DIF-correlation and standard deviation method uses to compute the local weight of the criteria, and the DIF-DEMATEL methodology uses to obtain the global weight of them. Furthermore, to compute the weight of the experts are used the DIF-compensatory degree method. Eventually, the final criteria weights present with interdependence relation. After determining the proposed approach, in order to validate the method, a case study of free road construction is considered and solved the problem in its conditions. Finally, in order to evaluate the efficiency and quality of the proposed method, this method is compared with a relevant method in the literature, which showed the superiority of the proposed method.

Suggested Citation

  • Mohsen Nezami & Hossein Gitinavard & Amir Ebrahimi Zade, 2025. "Soft computing-based new dynamic intuitionistic fuzzy group decision analysis for risk evaluation in BOT highway construction projects," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 25(2), pages 1-28, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:operea:v:25:y:2025:i:2:d:10.1007_s12351-025-00942-0
    DOI: 10.1007/s12351-025-00942-0
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s12351-025-00942-0
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s12351-025-00942-0?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sathi Mukherjee, 2017. "Selection of Alternative Fuels for Sustainable Urban Transportation under Multi-criteria Intuitionistic Fuzzy Environment," Fuzzy Information and Engineering, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 9(1), pages 117-135, March.
    2. Xueguo Xu & Tingting Xu & Meizeng Gui, 2020. "Incentive Mechanism for Municipal Solid Waste Disposal PPP Projects in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-16, September.
    3. Salman Kimiagari & Samira Keivanpour, 2019. "An interactive risk visualisation tool for large-scale and complex engineering and construction projects under uncertainty and interdependence," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 57(21), pages 6827-6855, November.
    4. D. Yaghubi & M. Doroodian & M. A. Adibi & Reza Lotfi, 2023. "Development of a Financing Optimization Framework Based on Risk Simulation in BOT Projects: A Case Study of the Waste-to-Energy Project," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2023, pages 1-23, August.
    5. Aven, Terje, 2016. "Risk assessment and risk management: Review of recent advances on their foundation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 253(1), pages 1-13.
    6. Sandeep Kumar & Shalu Rani & Mohit Kumar, 2021. "A New Order Function for Interval-Valued Intuitionistic Fuzzy Numbers and Its Application in Group Decision Making," Fuzzy Information and Engineering, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 13(1), pages 111-126, January.
    7. Martin Schieg, 2006. "Risk management in construction project management," Journal of Business Economics and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 7(2), pages 77-83.
    8. Mahdi Pourrafiee & AmirHossein Nafei & Shokoufe Banihashemi & S. Pourmohammad Azizi, 2020. "Comparing Entropies in Portfolio Diversification with Fuzzy Value at Risk and Higher-Order Moment," Fuzzy Information and Engineering, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 12(1), pages 123-138, January.
    9. repec:eme:bsppss:09657960410563540 is not listed on IDEAS
    10. Terje Aven & Ortwin Renn, 2010. "Risk Management and Governance," Risk, Governance and Society, Springer, number 978-3-642-13926-0, July.
    11. Michael Power, 2004. "The risk management of everything," Journal of Risk Finance, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 5(3), pages 58-65, March.
    12. Gholamreza Dehdasht & M Salim Ferwati & Rosli Mohamad Zin & Nazirah Zainul Abidin, 2020. "A hybrid approach using entropy and TOPSIS to select key drivers for a successful and sustainable lean construction implementation," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(2), pages 1-32, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zeng, Qing & Lu, Xinjie & Xu, Jin & Lin, Yu, 2024. "Macro-Driven Stock Market Volatility Prediction: Insights from a New Hybrid Machine Learning Approach," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 96(PB).
    2. Leif Inge K. Sørskår & Eirik B. Abrahamsen, 2017. "On how to manage uncertainty when considering regulatory HSE interventions," EURO Journal on Decision Processes, Springer;EURO - The Association of European Operational Research Societies, vol. 5(1), pages 97-116, November.
    3. Aven, Terje & Renn, Ortwin, 2018. "Improving government policy on risk: Eight key principles," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 176(C), pages 230-241.
    4. Galina Shevchenko & Leonas Ustinovichius & Dariusz Walasek, 2019. "The Evaluation of the Contractor’s Risk in Implementing the Investment Projects in Construction by Using the Verbal Analysis Methods," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-18, May.
    5. Terje Aven, 2018. "Reflections on the Use of Conceptual Research in Risk Analysis," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 38(11), pages 2415-2423, November.
    6. Sisira S. Withanachchi & Ilia Kunchulia & Giorgi Ghambashidze & Rami Al Sidawi & Teo Urushadze & Angelika Ploeger, 2018. "Farmers’ Perception of Water Quality and Risks in the Mashavera River Basin, Georgia: Analyzing the Vulnerability of the Social-Ecological System through Community Perceptions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-26, August.
    7. Rolando Rubilar-Torrealba & Lisandro Fermin & Soledad Torres, 2025. "Modeling Maximum drawdown Records with Piecewise Deterministic Markov Processe in Capital Markets," Papers 2503.23221, arXiv.org.
    8. Sven Ove Hansson & Terje Aven, 2014. "Is Risk Analysis Scientific?," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 34(7), pages 1173-1183, July.
    9. Julia Eichholz & Nicole Hoffmann & Anja Schwering, 2024. "The role of risk management orientation and the planning function of budgeting in enhancing organizational resilience and its effect on competitive advantages during times of crises," Journal of Management Control: Zeitschrift für Planung und Unternehmenssteuerung, Springer, vol. 35(1), pages 17-58, March.
    10. Yang, Ya Ling, 2020. "Comparison of public perception and risk management decisions of aircraft noise near Taoyuan and Kaohsiung International Airports," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 85(C).
    11. repec:arp:tjssrr:2019:p:69-75 is not listed on IDEAS
    12. Mussard, Stéphane & Pi Alperin, María Noel, 2021. "Accounting for risk factors on health outcomes: The case of Luxembourg," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 291(3), pages 1180-1197.
    13. Zohreh Molamohamadi & Mahmoud Asad Samani & Marjan Karimi, 2024. "Reviewing the historical milestones of risk management," SN Business & Economics, Springer, vol. 4(12), pages 1-20, December.
    14. Tamar Awad & Jesús Guardiola & David Fraíz, 2021. "Sustainable Construction: Improving Productivity through Lean Construction," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-24, December.
    15. Zio, E., 2018. "The future of risk assessment," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 177(C), pages 176-190.
    16. Ravi Kashyap, 2024. "The Concentration Risk Indicator: Raising the Bar for Financial Stability and Portfolio Performance Measurement," Papers 2408.07271, arXiv.org.
    17. Natalia Vladimirovna Gryzunova & Victoria Ivanovna Pyatanova & Viktoriya Valeryevna Manuylenko & Konstantin Vasilievich Ordov, 2019. "Models of credit limit-setting for companies as means of encouraging competitiveness," Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 7(1), pages 615-625, September.
    18. Mangirdas Morkunas & Gintaras Cernius & Gintare Giriuniene, 2019. "Assessing Business Risks of Natural Gas Trading Companies: Evidence from GET Baltic," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(14), pages 1-14, July.
    19. Scholz, Roland W. & Czichos, Reiner & Parycek, Peter & Lampoltshammer, Thomas J., 2020. "Organizational vulnerability of digital threats: A first validation of an assessment method," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 282(2), pages 627-643.
    20. Elizabeth Sheedy & Dominic S. B. Canestrari‐Soh, 2023. "Does executive accountability enhance risk management and risk culture?," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 63(4), pages 4093-4124, December.
    21. Dr Jason Mwanza & Nothando Tshuma, 2023. "Mitigating Business Risk in Manufacturing SMEs: A nexus between informal and formal business risk management: A case of Bulawayo, Zimbabwe," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 7(1), pages 1107-1138, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:operea:v:25:y:2025:i:2:d:10.1007_s12351-025-00942-0. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.