IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/nathaz/v121y2025i8d10.1007_s11069-025-07184-5.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Dual risk-targeted seismic and tsunami hazard assessment for western Makran coasts, southeast Iran

Author

Listed:
  • Mohammad Rahimi

    (University of Tehran)

  • Hamid Zafarani

    (International Institute of Earthquake Engineering and Seismology (IIEES))

  • Morteza Eskandari-Ghadi

    (University of Tehran)

  • Leila Etemadsaeed

    (International Institute of Earthquake Engineering and Seismology (IIEES))

Abstract

This study presents a comprehensive assessment of multi-hazard seismic and tsunami risks along the western Makran coastline, originating from earthquakes in the Makran Subduction Zone (MSZ). As infrastructure development intensifies in this region, a combined risk assessment of seismic and tsunami hazards becomes paramount. A holistic approach integrates probabilistic seismic hazard assessment (PSHA) and probabilistic tsunami hazard assessment (PTHA) using Boolean logic rules to evaluate cumulative damages. Fragility curves based on peak ground acceleration (PGA) for seismic ground motion and median peak momentum flux (PMF) for tsunami intensity measures are employed. Over 1700 earthquake scenarios in the MSZ are modeled, revealing that seismic and tsunami hazards increase from west to east along the coastline. The uniform hazard calculated PGA and peak tsunami amplitude (PTA) values for a return period of 2475 years reach 0.6 g (for the easternmost point of the Makran coast in Iran) and 8.5 m in Chabahar, respectively. Combined seismic and tsunami risks are evaluated for structures such as concrete moment frames (CMF) and unreinforced masonry bearing walls (URML). Results indicate a 35.3% risk of moderate or greater damage to URML buildings over 50 years in high-risk areas like Chabahar, due to cascading seismic and tsunami events. A comparison of results with Oregon Seaside in the Cascadia Subduction Zone (CSZ) shows higher seismic-induced damage and lower tsunami-induced damage in Oregon compared to Makran, due to distinct seismic and tsunami hazard curves and bathymetric conditions. Using a risk-targeted approach for a 1% probability of failure risk over 50 years (ν(F) = 2 × 10−4) and equivalent to a 10% structural failure probability (P_F (IM = im) = 0.1), the maximum calculated PGA, PTA, and PMF values along the Makran coastline are estimated at 0.46 g, 7.6 m, and 275 m3/s2, respectively. The study introduces a dual risk-targeted approach, calculating pairs of ground motion and tsunami intensity parameters for specific failure probabilities to generate risk curves for structural design. Results highlight a significant underestimation of design parameters when dual risk-targeted approaches are not considered. The integration of multi-hazard seismic and tsunami risk assessments, along with the dual risk-targeted approach, provides valuable insights for policymakers and stakeholders in coastal resilience planning.

Suggested Citation

  • Mohammad Rahimi & Hamid Zafarani & Morteza Eskandari-Ghadi & Leila Etemadsaeed, 2025. "Dual risk-targeted seismic and tsunami hazard assessment for western Makran coasts, southeast Iran," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 121(8), pages 9879-9908, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:nathaz:v:121:y:2025:i:8:d:10.1007_s11069-025-07184-5
    DOI: 10.1007/s11069-025-07184-5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11069-025-07184-5
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11069-025-07184-5?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:nathaz:v:121:y:2025:i:8:d:10.1007_s11069-025-07184-5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.