IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/nathaz/v121y2025i6d10.1007_s11069-024-07026-w.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Local perspectives on gully erosion: a comparative study of farmers and non-farmers in the Chotanagpur plateau fringe, West Bengal

Author

Listed:
  • Md Hasanuzzaman

    (Raja N. L. Khan Women’s College, Vidyasagar University
    Raja N. L. Khan Women’s College (Autonomous))

  • Pravat Kumar Shit

    (Raja N. L. Khan Women’s College, Vidyasagar University)

  • Javed Mallick

    (King Khalid University, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia)

  • Saeed Alqadhi

    (King Khalid University, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia)

  • Swapan Talukdar

    (Asutosh College, University of Calcutta)

Abstract

Soil erosion especially gully erosion is a significant global agricultural challenge, including in India. In West Bengal, about 30.10% of land faces degradation, particularly along the eastern fringes of the Chotanagpur Plateau. While much research has focused on gully morphology, geometry, and susceptibility mapping, there is a notable gap in studies addressing local perceptions of gully erosion, both globally and in India. This research addresses that gap by examining the perceptions of farmers and non-farmers regarding gully erosion, its causes, impacts, and potential mitigation strategies. Data was collected through surveys, interviews, and focus group discussions involving 367 households from 40 villages. The findings reveal that 91% of farmers recognize the severity of gully erosion, compared to just 73% of non-farmers. Based on principal component analysis, farmers primarily attribute the problem to surface runoff (11.6%), while non-farmers cite road construction (10.8%). Farmers perceive soil loss (11.7%) as the major impact, whereas non-farmers focus on declining property values (11%). Regarding solutions, 11.6% of farmers consider cover crops highly effective, compared to 9.9% of non-farmers who prefer crop rotation. Farmers favor native species like Sal, Petsa, Dhau, and Mahua over Eucalyptus and Acacia, with Evolvulus nummularia identified as particularly effective. Multi-correlation analysis reveals that gully erosion involves multiple interrelated factors, with no single cause or solution. Farmers, due to their practical experience and scientific knowledge, have a better understanding of gully erosion than non-farmers. Incorporating farmers’ insights can enhance erosion control strategies and inform policymakers for more effective decision-making.

Suggested Citation

  • Md Hasanuzzaman & Pravat Kumar Shit & Javed Mallick & Saeed Alqadhi & Swapan Talukdar, 2025. "Local perspectives on gully erosion: a comparative study of farmers and non-farmers in the Chotanagpur plateau fringe, West Bengal," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 121(6), pages 6677-6697, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:nathaz:v:121:y:2025:i:6:d:10.1007_s11069-024-07026-w
    DOI: 10.1007/s11069-024-07026-w
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11069-024-07026-w
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11069-024-07026-w?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:nathaz:v:121:y:2025:i:6:d:10.1007_s11069-024-07026-w. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.