IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/jsched/v22y2019i1d10.1007_s10951-018-0570-4.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Scheduling and rescheduling elective patients in operating rooms to minimise the percentage of tardy patients

Author

Listed:
  • Francisco Ballestín

    (Universitat de València)

  • Ángeles Pérez

    (Universitat de València)

  • Sacramento Quintanilla

    (Universitat de València)

Abstract

This paper considers the problem of building a schedule of elective surgery patients for a unit of a hospital. Two phases are followed. In the first phase, a tentative schedule is calculated 2 weeks before the planning period looking to minimise the percentage of tardy patients. Several weight-based short-term objective functions are defined and compared to optimise this goal in the long term. In the second phase, a second and final schedule is made a few days before the planning period, taking into account the changes in the available information. We propose a general methodology to calculate this final schedule. Several strategies to manage the types and importance of changes from the tentative schedule are presented considering the idiosyncrasy of dealing with elective patients. The computational experiments have been carried out via simulation on instances randomly generated according to the data from a Spanish hospital.

Suggested Citation

  • Francisco Ballestín & Ángeles Pérez & Sacramento Quintanilla, 2019. "Scheduling and rescheduling elective patients in operating rooms to minimise the percentage of tardy patients," Journal of Scheduling, Springer, vol. 22(1), pages 107-118, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:jsched:v:22:y:2019:i:1:d:10.1007_s10951-018-0570-4
    DOI: 10.1007/s10951-018-0570-4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10951-018-0570-4
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10951-018-0570-4?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Persson, Marie & Persson, Jan A., 2009. "Health economic modeling to support surgery management at a Swedish hospital," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 37(4), pages 853-863, August.
    2. Rafael Velásquez & Teresa Melo & Karl-Heinz Küfer, 2008. "Tactical Operating Theatre Scheduling: Efficient Appointment Assignment," Operations Research Proceedings, in: Jörg Kalcsics & Stefan Nickel (ed.), Operations Research Proceedings 2007, pages 303-308, Springer.
    3. Bernardetta Addis & Giuliana Carello & Andrea Grosso & Elena Tànfani, 2016. "Operating room scheduling and rescheduling: a rolling horizon approach," Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, Springer, vol. 28(1), pages 206-232, June.
    4. J. Essen & Johann Hurink & Woutske Hartholt & Bernd Akker, 2012. "Decision support system for the operating room rescheduling problem," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 15(4), pages 355-372, December.
    5. Cardoen, Brecht & Demeulemeester, Erik & Beliën, Jeroen, 2010. "Operating room planning and scheduling: A literature review," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 201(3), pages 921-932, March.
    6. Francesca Guerriero & Rosita Guido, 2011. "Operational research in the management of the operating theatre: a survey," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 14(1), pages 89-114, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sean Harris & David Claudio, 2022. "Current Trends in Operating Room Scheduling 2015 to 2020: a Literature Review," SN Operations Research Forum, Springer, vol. 3(1), pages 1-42, March.
    2. van Kessel, Paul J. & Freeman, Floris C. & Santos, Bruno F., 2023. "Airline maintenance task rescheduling in a disruptive environment," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 308(2), pages 605-621.
    3. Gaia Nicosia & Andrea Pacifici & Ulrich Pferschy & Julia Resch & Giovanni Righini, 2021. "Optimally rescheduling jobs with a Last-In-First-Out buffer," Journal of Scheduling, Springer, vol. 24(6), pages 663-680, December.
    4. Şeyda Gür & Mehmet Pınarbaşı & Hacı Mehmet Alakaş & Tamer Eren, 2023. "Operating room scheduling with surgical team: a new approach with constraint programming and goal programming," Central European Journal of Operations Research, Springer;Slovak Society for Operations Research;Hungarian Operational Research Society;Czech Society for Operations Research;Österr. Gesellschaft für Operations Research (ÖGOR);Slovenian Society Informatika - Section for Operational Research;Croatian Operational Research Society, vol. 31(4), pages 1061-1085, December.
    5. F. Davarian & J. Behnamian, 2022. "Robust finite-horizon scheduling/rescheduling of operating rooms with elective and emergency surgeries under resource constraints," Journal of Scheduling, Springer, vol. 25(6), pages 625-641, December.
    6. Ulrich Pferschy & Julia Resch & Giovanni Righini, 2023. "Algorithms for rescheduling jobs with a LIFO buffer to minimize the weighted number of late jobs," Journal of Scheduling, Springer, vol. 26(3), pages 267-287, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Michael Samudra & Carla Van Riet & Erik Demeulemeester & Brecht Cardoen & Nancy Vansteenkiste & Frank E. Rademakers, 2016. "Scheduling operating rooms: achievements, challenges and pitfalls," Journal of Scheduling, Springer, vol. 19(5), pages 493-525, October.
    2. Akbarzadeh, Babak & Moslehi, Ghasem & Reisi-Nafchi, Mohammad & Maenhout, Broos, 2019. "The re-planning and scheduling of surgical cases in the operating room department after block release time with resource rescheduling," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 278(2), pages 596-614.
    3. Gökalp, E. & Gülpınar, N. & Doan, X.V., 2023. "Dynamic surgery management under uncertainty," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 309(2), pages 832-844.
    4. Shuwan Zhu & Wenjuan Fan & Shanlin Yang & Jun Pei & Panos M. Pardalos, 2019. "Operating room planning and surgical case scheduling: a review of literature," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 37(3), pages 757-805, April.
    5. Sebastian Rachuba & Brigitte Werners, 2017. "A fuzzy multi-criteria approach for robust operating room schedules," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 251(1), pages 325-350, April.
    6. Hossein Hashemi Doulabi & Soheyl Khalilpourazari, 2023. "Stochastic weekly operating room planning with an exponential number of scenarios," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 328(1), pages 643-664, September.
    7. Sean Harris & David Claudio, 2022. "Current Trends in Operating Room Scheduling 2015 to 2020: a Literature Review," SN Operations Research Forum, Springer, vol. 3(1), pages 1-42, March.
    8. Vandenberghe, Mathieu & De Vuyst, Stijn & Aghezzaf, El-Houssaine & Bruneel, Herwig, 2019. "Surgery sequencing to minimize the expected maximum waiting time of emergent patients," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 275(3), pages 971-982.
    9. Jose M. Molina-Pariente & Erwin W. Hans & Jose M. Framinan, 2018. "A stochastic approach for solving the operating room scheduling problem," Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, Springer, vol. 30(1), pages 224-251, June.
    10. Aisha Tayyab & Saif Ullah & Mohammed Fazle Baki, 2023. "An Outer Approximation Method for Scheduling Elective Surgeries with Sequence Dependent Setup Times to Multiple Operating Rooms," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-15, May.
    11. Javiera Barrera & Rodrigo A. Carrasco & Susana Mondschein & Gianpiero Canessa & David Rojas-Zalazar, 2020. "Operating room scheduling under waiting time constraints: the Chilean GES plan," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 286(1), pages 501-527, March.
    12. Marques, Inês & Captivo, M. Eugénia, 2017. "Different stakeholders’ perspectives for a surgical case assignment problem: Deterministic and robust approaches," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 261(1), pages 260-278.
    13. repec:ipg:wpaper:2013-014 is not listed on IDEAS
    14. Steffen Heider & Jan Schoenfelder & Thomas Koperna & Jens O. Brunner, 2022. "Balancing control and autonomy in master surgery scheduling: Benefits of ICU quotas for recovery units," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 25(2), pages 311-332, June.
    15. Zhang, Yu & Wang, Yu & Tang, Jiafu & Lim, Andrew, 2020. "Mitigating overtime risk in tactical surgical scheduling," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 93(C).
    16. Şeyda Gür & Mehmet Pınarbaşı & Hacı Mehmet Alakaş & Tamer Eren, 2023. "Operating room scheduling with surgical team: a new approach with constraint programming and goal programming," Central European Journal of Operations Research, Springer;Slovak Society for Operations Research;Hungarian Operational Research Society;Czech Society for Operations Research;Österr. Gesellschaft für Operations Research (ÖGOR);Slovenian Society Informatika - Section for Operational Research;Croatian Operational Research Society, vol. 31(4), pages 1061-1085, December.
    17. F. Davarian & J. Behnamian, 2022. "Robust finite-horizon scheduling/rescheduling of operating rooms with elective and emergency surgeries under resource constraints," Journal of Scheduling, Springer, vol. 25(6), pages 625-641, December.
    18. Weiya Zhong & Yun Shi, 2018. "Two-stage no-wait hybrid flowshop scheduling with inter-stage flexibility," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 35(1), pages 108-125, January.
    19. Gartner, Daniel & Kolisch, Rainer, 2014. "Scheduling the hospital-wide flow of elective patients," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 233(3), pages 689-699.
    20. Riise, Atle & Mannino, Carlo & Lamorgese, Leonardo, 2016. "Recursive logic-based Benders’ decomposition for multi-mode outpatient scheduling," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 255(3), pages 719-728.
    21. Cappanera, Paola & Visintin, Filippo & Banditori, Carlo, 2014. "Comparing resource balancing criteria in master surgical scheduling: A combined optimisation-simulation approach," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 158(C), pages 179-196.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:jsched:v:22:y:2019:i:1:d:10.1007_s10951-018-0570-4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.