IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/joptap/v195y2022i1d10.1007_s10957-022-02074-3.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Four-Operator Splitting via a Forward–Backward–Half-Forward Algorithm with Line Search

Author

Listed:
  • Luis M. Briceño-Arias

    (Universidad Técnica Federico Santa María)

  • Fernando Roldán

    (Universidad Técnica Federico Santa María)

Abstract

In this article, we provide a splitting method for solving monotone inclusions in a real Hilbert space involving four operators: a maximally monotone, a monotone-Lipschitzian, a cocoercive, and a monotone-continuous operator. The proposed method takes advantage of the intrinsic properties of each operator, generalizing the forward–backward–half-forward splitting and the Tseng’s algorithm with line search. At each iteration, our algorithm defines the step size by using a line search in which the monotone-Lipschitzian and the cocoercive operators need only one activation. We also derive a method for solving nonlinearly constrained composite convex optimization problems in real Hilbert spaces. Finally, we implement our algorithm in a nonlinearly constrained least-square problem and we compare its performance with available methods in the literature.

Suggested Citation

  • Luis M. Briceño-Arias & Fernando Roldán, 2022. "Four-Operator Splitting via a Forward–Backward–Half-Forward Algorithm with Line Search," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 195(1), pages 205-225, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:joptap:v:195:y:2022:i:1:d:10.1007_s10957-022-02074-3
    DOI: 10.1007/s10957-022-02074-3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10957-022-02074-3
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10957-022-02074-3?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yunda Dong, 2021. "Weak convergence of an extended splitting method for monotone inclusions," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 79(1), pages 257-277, January.
    2. Patrick R. Johnstone & Jonathan Eckstein, 2021. "Single-forward-step projective splitting: exploiting cocoercivity," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 78(1), pages 125-166, January.
    3. Jonathan Eckstein, 2017. "A Simplified Form of Block-Iterative Operator Splitting and an Asynchronous Algorithm Resembling the Multi-Block Alternating Direction Method of Multipliers," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 173(1), pages 155-182, April.
    4. Boţ, Radu Ioan & Csetnek, Ernö Robert & Hendrich, Christopher, 2015. "Inertial Douglas–Rachford splitting for monotone inclusion problems," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 256(C), pages 472-487.
    5. Rieger, Janosch & Tam, Matthew K., 2020. "Backward-Forward-Reflected-Backward Splitting for Three Operator Monotone Inclusions," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 381(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. E. M. Bednarczuk & A. Jezierska & K. E. Rutkowski, 2018. "Proximal primal–dual best approximation algorithm with memory," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 71(3), pages 767-794, December.
    2. Dong, Yunda, 2023. "A new splitting method for systems of monotone inclusions in Hilbert spaces," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 203(C), pages 518-537.
    3. Majela Pentón Machado & Mauricio Romero Sicre, 2023. "A Projective Splitting Method for Monotone Inclusions: Iteration-Complexity and Application to Composite Optimization," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 198(2), pages 552-587, August.
    4. Pawicha Phairatchatniyom & Poom Kumam & Yeol Je Cho & Wachirapong Jirakitpuwapat & Kanokwan Sitthithakerngkiet, 2019. "The Modified Inertial Iterative Algorithm for Solving Split Variational Inclusion Problem for Multi-Valued Quasi Nonexpansive Mappings with Some Applications," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 7(6), pages 1-22, June.
    5. Chinedu Izuchukwu & Yekini Shehu, 2021. "New Inertial Projection Methods for Solving Multivalued Variational Inequality Problems Beyond Monotonicity," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 21(2), pages 291-323, June.
    6. Q. L. Dong & J. Z. Huang & X. H. Li & Y. J. Cho & Th. M. Rassias, 2019. "MiKM: multi-step inertial Krasnosel’skiǐ–Mann algorithm and its applications," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 73(4), pages 801-824, April.
    7. Seifu Endris Yimer & Poom Kumam & Anteneh Getachew Gebrie & Rabian Wangkeeree, 2019. "Inertial Method for Bilevel Variational Inequality Problems with Fixed Point and Minimizer Point Constraints," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 7(9), pages 1-21, September.
    8. Francisco J. Aragón Artacho & Rubén Campoy & Matthew K. Tam, 2021. "Strengthened splitting methods for computing resolvents," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 80(2), pages 549-585, November.
    9. Dongying Wang & Xianfu Wang, 2019. "A parameterized Douglas–Rachford algorithm," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 73(3), pages 839-869, July.
    10. Adil Salim & Laurent Condat & Konstantin Mishchenko & Peter Richtárik, 2022. "Dualize, Split, Randomize: Toward Fast Nonsmooth Optimization Algorithms," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 195(1), pages 102-130, October.
    11. Chanjuan Pan & Yuanheng Wang, 2019. "Convergence Theorems for Modified Inertial Viscosity Splitting Methods in Banach Spaces," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 7(2), pages 1-12, February.
    12. Hedy Attouch & Zaki Chbani & Jalal Fadili & Hassan Riahi, 2022. "Fast Convergence of Dynamical ADMM via Time Scaling of Damped Inertial Dynamics," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 193(1), pages 704-736, June.
    13. Zhongming Wu & Min Li, 2019. "General inertial proximal gradient method for a class of nonconvex nonsmooth optimization problems," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 73(1), pages 129-158, May.
    14. Radu Ioan Boţ & Ernö Robert Csetnek, 2016. "An Inertial Tseng’s Type Proximal Algorithm for Nonsmooth and Nonconvex Optimization Problems," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 171(2), pages 600-616, November.
    15. M. Marques Alves & Jonathan Eckstein & Marina Geremia & Jefferson G. Melo, 2020. "Relative-error inertial-relaxed inexact versions of Douglas-Rachford and ADMM splitting algorithms," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 75(2), pages 389-422, March.
    16. Xiaoqi Yang & Chenchen Zu, 2022. "Convergence of Inexact Quasisubgradient Methods with Extrapolation," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 193(1), pages 676-703, June.
    17. Dang Van Hieu & Jean Jacques Strodiot & Le Dung Muu, 2020. "An Explicit Extragradient Algorithm for Solving Variational Inequalities," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 185(2), pages 476-503, May.
    18. Q. L. Dong & Y. J. Cho & L. L. Zhong & Th. M. Rassias, 2018. "Inertial projection and contraction algorithms for variational inequalities," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 70(3), pages 687-704, March.
    19. Yekini Shehu & Aviv Gibali, 2020. "Inertial Krasnoselskii–Mann Method in Banach Spaces," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(4), pages 1-13, April.
    20. Dang Hieu, 2018. "An inertial-like proximal algorithm for equilibrium problems," Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research (GOR);Nederlands Genootschap voor Besliskunde (NGB), vol. 88(3), pages 399-415, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:joptap:v:195:y:2022:i:1:d:10.1007_s10957-022-02074-3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.