IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/jglopt/v83y2022i2d10.1007_s10898-021-01105-z.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Newton Frank–Wolfe method for constrained self-concordant minimization

Author

Listed:
  • Deyi Liu

    (The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill)

  • Volkan Cevher

    (Laboratory for Information and Inference Systems, EPFL)

  • Quoc Tran-Dinh

    (The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill)

Abstract

We develop a new Newton Frank–Wolfe algorithm to solve a class of constrained self-concordant minimization problems using linear minimization oracles (LMO). Unlike L-smooth convex functions, where the Lipschitz continuity of the objective gradient holds globally, the class of self-concordant functions only has local bounds, making it difficult to estimate the number of linear minimization oracle (LMO) calls for the underlying optimization algorithm. Fortunately, we can still prove that the number of LMO calls of our method is nearly the same as that of the standard Frank-Wolfe method in the L-smooth case. Specifically, our method requires at most $${\mathcal {O}}\big (\varepsilon ^{-(1 + \nu )}\big )$$ O ( ε - ( 1 + ν ) ) LMO’s, where $$\varepsilon $$ ε is the desired accuracy, and $$\nu \in (0, 0.139)$$ ν ∈ ( 0 , 0.139 ) is a given constant depending on the chosen initial point of the proposed algorithm. Our intensive numerical experiments on three applications: portfolio design with the competitive ratio, D-optimal experimental design, and logistic regression with elastic-net regularizer, show that the proposed Newton Frank–Wolfe method outperforms different state-of-the-art competitors.

Suggested Citation

  • Deyi Liu & Volkan Cevher & Quoc Tran-Dinh, 2022. "A Newton Frank–Wolfe method for constrained self-concordant minimization," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 83(2), pages 273-299, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:jglopt:v:83:y:2022:i:2:d:10.1007_s10898-021-01105-z
    DOI: 10.1007/s10898-021-01105-z
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10898-021-01105-z
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10898-021-01105-z?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Leonid G. Khachiyan, 1996. "Rounding of Polytopes in the Real Number Model of Computation," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 21(2), pages 307-320, May.
    2. Marguerite Frank & Philip Wolfe, 1956. "An algorithm for quadratic programming," Naval Research Logistics Quarterly, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 3(1‐2), pages 95-110, March.
    3. Fabiana R. Oliveira & Orizon P. Ferreira & Gilson N. Silva, 2019. "Newton’s method with feasible inexact projections for solving constrained generalized equations," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 72(1), pages 159-177, January.
    4. Amir Beck & Marc Teboulle, 2004. "A conditional gradient method with linear rate of convergence for solving convex linear systems," Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research (GOR);Nederlands Genootschap voor Besliskunde (NGB), vol. 59(2), pages 235-247, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. R. Díaz Millán & O. P. Ferreira & J. Ugon, 2023. "Approximate Douglas–Rachford algorithm for two-sets convex feasibility problems," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 86(3), pages 621-636, July.
    2. P. B. Assunção & O. P. Ferreira & L. F. Prudente, 2021. "Conditional gradient method for multiobjective optimization," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 78(3), pages 741-768, April.
    3. R. Díaz Millán & O. P. Ferreira & L. F. Prudente, 2021. "Alternating conditional gradient method for convex feasibility problems," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 80(1), pages 245-269, September.
    4. O. P. Ferreira & M. Lemes & L. F. Prudente, 2022. "On the inexact scaled gradient projection method," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 81(1), pages 91-125, January.
    5. Guillaume Sagnol & Edouard Pauwels, 2019. "An unexpected connection between Bayes A-optimal designs and the group lasso," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 60(2), pages 565-584, April.
    6. Abdelfettah Laouzai & Rachid Ouafi, 2022. "A prediction model for atmospheric pollution reduction from urban traffic," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 49(2), pages 566-584, February.
    7. Chou, Chang-Chi & Chiang, Wen-Chu & Chen, Albert Y., 2022. "Emergency medical response in mass casualty incidents considering the traffic congestions in proximity on-site and hospital delays," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    8. Francesco Rinaldi & Damiano Zeffiro, 2023. "Avoiding bad steps in Frank-Wolfe variants," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 84(1), pages 225-264, January.
    9. Beck, Yasmine & Ljubić, Ivana & Schmidt, Martin, 2023. "A survey on bilevel optimization under uncertainty," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 311(2), pages 401-426.
    10. Friesz, Terry L. & Tourreilles, Francisco A. & Han, Anthony Fu-Wha, 1979. "Multi-Criteria Optimization Methods in Transport Project Evaluation: The Case of Rural Roads in Developing Countries," Transportation Research Forum Proceedings 1970s 318817, Transportation Research Forum.
    11. Fabiana R. Oliveira & Orizon P. Ferreira & Gilson N. Silva, 2019. "Newton’s method with feasible inexact projections for solving constrained generalized equations," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 72(1), pages 159-177, January.
    12. Ali Fattahi & Sriram Dasu & Reza Ahmadi, 2019. "Mass Customization and “Forecasting Options’ Penetration Rates Problem”," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 67(4), pages 1120-1134, July.
    13. Bo Jiang & Tianyi Lin & Shiqian Ma & Shuzhong Zhang, 2019. "Structured nonconvex and nonsmooth optimization: algorithms and iteration complexity analysis," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 72(1), pages 115-157, January.
    14. James Chok & Geoffrey M. Vasil, 2023. "Convex optimization over a probability simplex," Papers 2305.09046, arXiv.org.
    15. Selin Ahipaşaoğlu, 2015. "Fast algorithms for the minimum volume estimator," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 62(2), pages 351-370, June.
    16. A. de Palma & Y. Nesterov, 2001. "Stationary Dynamic Solutions in Congested Transportation Networks: Summary and Perspectives," THEMA Working Papers 2001-19, THEMA (THéorie Economique, Modélisation et Applications), Université de Cergy-Pontoise.
    17. D. J. White, 1993. "A parametric‐based heuristic program for the quadratic assignment problem," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 40(4), pages 553-568, June.
    18. Kang, Seong-Cheol & Lee, Hoyoung, 2019. "Economic appraisal of implementing electric vehicle taxis in Seoul," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 45-52.
    19. Michael W. Levin & Melissa Duell & S. Travis Waller, 2020. "Arrival Time Reliability in Strategic User Equilibrium," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 20(3), pages 803-831, September.
    20. Yong Xia & Zi Xu, 2010. "An efficient Lagrangian smoothing heuristic for Max-Cut," Indian Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics, Springer, vol. 41(5), pages 683-700, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:jglopt:v:83:y:2022:i:2:d:10.1007_s10898-021-01105-z. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.