IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/jcomop/v45y2023i4d10.1007_s10878-023-01026-5.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Algorithms for maximizing monotone submodular function minus modular function under noise

Author

Listed:
  • Shufang Gong

    (Ocean University of China)

  • Bin Liu

    (Ocean University of China)

  • Mengxue Geng

    (Ocean University of China)

  • Qizhi Fang

    (Ocean University of China)

Abstract

Submodular function has the property of diminishing marginal gain, and thus it has a wide range of applications in combinatorial optimization and in emerging disciplines such as machine learning and artificial intelligence. For any set S, most of previous works usually do not consider how to compute f(S) , but assume that there exists an oracle that will output f(S) directly. In reality, however, the process of computing the exact f is often inevitably inaccurate or costly. At this point, we adopt the easily available noise version F of f. In this paper, we investigate the problems of maximizing a non-negative monotone normalized submodular function minus a non-negative modular function under the $$\varepsilon $$ ε -multiplicative noise in three situations, i.e., the cardinality constraint, the matroid constraint and the online unconstraint. For the above problems, we design three deterministic bicriteria approximation algorithms using greedy and threshold ideas and furthermore obtain good approximation guarantees.

Suggested Citation

  • Shufang Gong & Bin Liu & Mengxue Geng & Qizhi Fang, 2023. "Algorithms for maximizing monotone submodular function minus modular function under noise," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 45(4), pages 1-18, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:jcomop:v:45:y:2023:i:4:d:10.1007_s10878-023-01026-5
    DOI: 10.1007/s10878-023-01026-5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10878-023-01026-5
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10878-023-01026-5?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Maxim Sviridenko & Jan Vondrák & Justin Ward, 2017. "Optimal Approximation for Submodular and Supermodular Optimization with Bounded Curvature," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 42(4), pages 1197-1218, November.
    2. Chambers,Christopher P. & Echenique,Federico, 2016. "Revealed Preference Theory," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9781107087804.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Cherchye, Laurens & Demuynck, Thomas & De Rock, Bram, 2018. "Transitivity of preferences: when does it matter?," Theoretical Economics, Econometric Society, vol. 13(3), September.
    2. Pawel Dziewulski, 2016. "Eliciting the just-noticeable difference," Economics Series Working Papers 798, University of Oxford, Department of Economics.
    3. Federico Echenique & SangMok Lee & Matthew Shum & M. Bumin Yenmez, 2021. "Stability and Median Rationalizability for Aggregate Matchings," Games, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-15, April.
    4. Domenico Cantone & Alfio Giarlotta & Stephen Watson, 2021. "Choice resolutions," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 56(4), pages 713-753, May.
    5. Federico Echenique & Taisuke Imai & Kota Saito, 2018. "Approximate Expected Utility Rationalization," CESifo Working Paper Series 7348, CESifo.
    6. H. Spencer Banzhaf & Yaqin Liu & Martin Smith & Frank Asche, 2019. "Non-Parametric Tests of the Tragedy of the Commons," NBER Working Papers 26398, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    7. Miguel A. Costa‐Gomes & Carlos Cueva & Georgios Gerasimou & Matúš Tejiščák, 2022. "Choice, deferral, and consistency," Quantitative Economics, Econometric Society, vol. 13(3), pages 1297-1318, July.
    8. Bin Liu & Miaomiao Hu, 2022. "Fast algorithms for maximizing monotone nonsubmodular functions," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 43(5), pages 1655-1670, July.
    9. Chambers, Christopher P. & Rehbeck, John, 2018. "Note on symmetric utility," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 27-29.
    10. Matthew Polisson, 2018. "A lattice test for additive separability," IFS Working Papers W18/08, Institute for Fiscal Studies.
    11. Zhenning Zhang & Bin Liu & Yishui Wang & Dachuan Xu & Dongmei Zhang, 2022. "Maximizing a monotone non-submodular function under a knapsack constraint," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 43(5), pages 1125-1148, July.
    12. Zhenning Zhang & Donglei Du & Yanjun Jiang & Chenchen Wu, 2021. "Maximizing DR-submodular+supermodular functions on the integer lattice subject to a cardinality constraint," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 80(3), pages 595-616, July.
    13. David J. Freeman, 2021. "Revealing Naïveté and Sophistication from Procrastination and Preproperation," American Economic Journal: Microeconomics, American Economic Association, vol. 13(2), pages 402-438, May.
    14. Narayanaswamy Balakrishnan & Efe A. Ok & Pietro Ortoleva, 2021. "Inferential Choice Theory," Working Papers 2021-60, Princeton University. Economics Department..
    15. Roy Allen & John Rehbeck, 2021. "Measuring rationality: percentages vs expenditures," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 91(2), pages 265-277, September.
    16. Chambers, Christopher P. & Echenique, Federico, 2020. "Spherical preferences," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
    17. El Karoui & Mrad Mohamed & Caroline Hillairet, 2022. "Bi-revealed utilities in a defaultable universe : a new point of view on consumption," Working Papers hal-03919186, HAL.
    18. Sylvain Chassang & Kei Kawai & Jun Nakabayashi & Juan Ortner, 2022. "Robust Screens for Noncompetitive Bidding in Procurement Auctions," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 90(1), pages 315-346, January.
    19. Mackenzie, Andrew & Zhou, Yu, 2022. "Menu mechanisms," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 204(C).
    20. Mikhail Freer & César Martinelli, 2023. "An algebraic approach to revealed preference," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 75(3), pages 717-742, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:jcomop:v:45:y:2023:i:4:d:10.1007_s10878-023-01026-5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.