IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/jcomop/v38y2019i1d10.1007_s10878-018-00374-x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Hardness, approximability, and fixed-parameter tractability of the clustered shortest-path tree problem

Author

Listed:
  • Mattia D’Emidio

    (University of L’Aquila)

  • Luca Forlizzi

    (University of L’Aquila)

  • Daniele Frigioni

    (University of L’Aquila)

  • Stefano Leucci

    (ETH Zürich)

  • Guido Proietti

    (University of L’Aquila
    Istituto di Analisi dei Sistemi e Informatica “Antonio Ruberti” Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche)

Abstract

Given an n-vertex non-negatively real-weighted graph G, whose vertices are partitioned into a set of k clusters, a clustered network design problem on G consists of solving a given network design optimization problem on G, subject to some additional constraints on its clusters. In particular, we focus on the classic problem of designing a single-source shortest-path tree, and we analyse its computational hardness when in a feasible solution each cluster is required to form a subtree. We first study the unweighted case, and prove that the problem is $${\textsf {NP}}$$ NP -hard. However, on the positive side, we show the existence of an approximation algorithm whose quality essentially depends on few parameters, but which remarkably is an O(1)-approximation when the largest out of all the diameters of the clusters is either O(1) or $$\varTheta (n)$$ Θ ( n ) . Furthermore, we also show that the problem is fixed-parameter tractable with respect to k or to the number of vertices that belong to clusters of size at least 2. Then, we focus on the weighted case, and show that the problem can be approximated within a tight factor of O(n), and that it is fixed-parameter tractable as well. Finally, we analyse the unweighted single-pair shortest path problem, and we show it is hard to approximate within a (tight) factor of $$n^{1-\epsilon }$$ n 1 - ϵ , for any $$\epsilon >0$$ ϵ > 0 .

Suggested Citation

  • Mattia D’Emidio & Luca Forlizzi & Daniele Frigioni & Stefano Leucci & Guido Proietti, 2019. "Hardness, approximability, and fixed-parameter tractability of the clustered shortest-path tree problem," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 38(1), pages 165-184, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:jcomop:v:38:y:2019:i:1:d:10.1007_s10878-018-00374-x
    DOI: 10.1007/s10878-018-00374-x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10878-018-00374-x
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10878-018-00374-x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bang Ye Wu & Chen-Wan Lin, 2015. "On the clustered Steiner tree problem," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 30(2), pages 370-386, August.
    2. Feremans, Corinne & Labbe, Martine & Laporte, Gilbert, 2003. "Generalized network design problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 148(1), pages 1-13, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chen-Wan Lin & Bang Ye Wu, 2017. "On the minimum routing cost clustered tree problem," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 33(3), pages 1106-1121, April.
    2. Pop, Petrică C., 2020. "The generalized minimum spanning tree problem: An overview of formulations, solution procedures and latest advances," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 283(1), pages 1-15.
    3. Garijo, Delia & Márquez, Alberto & Rodríguez, Natalia & Silveira, Rodrigo I., 2019. "Computing optimal shortcuts for networks," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 279(1), pages 26-37.
    4. Ghosh, Diptesh, 2003. "A Probabilistic Tabu Search Algorithm for the Generalized Minimum Spanning Tree Problem," IIMA Working Papers WP2003-07-02, Indian Institute of Management Ahmedabad, Research and Publication Department.
    5. Markus Leitner, 2016. "Integer programming models and branch-and-cut approaches to generalized {0,1,2}-survivable network design problems," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 65(1), pages 73-92, September.
    6. Ghosh, Diptesh, 2003. "Solving Medium to Large Sized Euclidean Generalized Minimum Spanning Tree Problems," IIMA Working Papers WP2003-08-02, Indian Institute of Management Ahmedabad, Research and Publication Department.
    7. J Renaud & F F Boctor & G Laporte, 2004. "Efficient heuristics for Median Cycle Problems," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 55(2), pages 179-186, February.
    8. Cosmin Sabo & Petrică C. Pop & Andrei Horvat-Marc, 2020. "On the Selective Vehicle Routing Problem," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(5), pages 1-11, May.
    9. Gallo, Mariano & D'Acierno, Luca & Montella, Bruno, 2010. "A meta-heuristic approach for solving the Urban Network Design Problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 201(1), pages 144-157, February.
    10. Yi Tao & Ek Peng Chew & Loo Hay Lee & Yuran Shi, 2017. "A column generation approach for the route planning problem in fourth party logistics," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 68(2), pages 165-181, February.
    11. Akyüz, M. Hakan & Lee, Chung-Yee, 2016. "Service type assignment and container routing with transit time constraints and empty container repositioning for liner shipping service networks," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 46-71.
    12. Feess, E. & Walzl, M., 2004. "An analysis of corporte leniency programs and lessons to learn for EU and US policies," Research Memorandum 037, Maastricht University, Maastricht Research School of Economics of Technology and Organization (METEOR).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:jcomop:v:38:y:2019:i:1:d:10.1007_s10878-018-00374-x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.