IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/jcomop/v19y2010i3d10.1007_s10878-009-9259-0.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Algorithms for storage allocation based on client preferences

Author

Listed:
  • Tami Tamir

    (The Interdisciplinary Center)

  • Benny Vaksendiser

    (The Interdisciplinary Center)

Abstract

We consider a packing problem arising in storage management of Video on Demand (VoD) systems. The system consists of a set of video files (movies) and several servers (disks), each having a limited storage capacity, C, and a limited bandwidth (load capacity), L. The goal in the storage allocation problem is to assign the video files to the servers and the bandwidth to the clients. The induced class-constrained packing problem was studied in the past assuming each client provides a single request for a single movie. This paper considers a more general and realistic model—in which each client ranks all the movies in the system. Specifically, for each client j and movie i, it is known how much client j is willing to pay in order to watch movie i. The goal is to maximize the system’s profit. Alternatively, the client might provide a ranking of the movies and the goal is to maximize the lexicographic profile of the solution. We prove that the problem is NP-complete and present approximation algorithms and heuristics for systems with a single or multiple disks. For a single disk we present an (1−1/e)-approximation algorithm that is extended for systems with storage costs, and for k-round broadcasting, in which each client might be serviced multiple times. For multiple disks we present a (C−1)(e−1)/Ce-approximation algorithm, two heuristics for determining the storage allocation, and an optimal bandwidth-allocation algorithm. In our simulation of a VoD system, we compared the performance of the suggested heuristics for systems with variable parameters and clients with variable preference distributions. We focused on systems in which client preferences and payment are power-law distributed: a few movies are very popular and clients are willing to pay significantly more for watching them. Our results can be applied to other packing and subset selection problems in which clients provide preferences over the elements.

Suggested Citation

  • Tami Tamir & Benny Vaksendiser, 2010. "Algorithms for storage allocation based on client preferences," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 19(3), pages 304-324, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:jcomop:v:19:y:2010:i:3:d:10.1007_s10878-009-9259-0
    DOI: 10.1007/s10878-009-9259-0
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10878-009-9259-0
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10878-009-9259-0?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Fisher, M.L. & Nemhauser, G.L. & Wolsey, L.A., 1978. "An analysis of approximations for maximizing submodular set functions," LIDAM Reprints CORE 341, Université catholique de Louvain, Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dam, Tien Thanh & Ta, Thuy Anh & Mai, Tien, 2022. "Submodularity and local search approaches for maximum capture problems under generalized extreme value models," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 300(3), pages 953-965.
    2. Beck, Yasmine & Ljubić, Ivana & Schmidt, Martin, 2023. "A survey on bilevel optimization under uncertainty," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 311(2), pages 401-426.
    3. Rad Niazadeh & Negin Golrezaei & Joshua Wang & Fransisca Susan & Ashwinkumar Badanidiyuru, 2023. "Online Learning via Offline Greedy Algorithms: Applications in Market Design and Optimization," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 69(7), pages 3797-3817, July.
    4. Averbakh, Igor & Berman, Oded, 1996. "Locating flow-capturing units on a network with multi-counting and diminishing returns to scale," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 91(3), pages 495-506, June.
    5. Alexandre D. Jesus & Luís Paquete & Arnaud Liefooghe, 2021. "A model of anytime algorithm performance for bi-objective optimization," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 79(2), pages 329-350, February.
    6. Bin Liu & Miaomiao Hu, 2022. "Fast algorithms for maximizing monotone nonsubmodular functions," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 43(5), pages 1655-1670, July.
    7. repec:dgr:rugsom:99a17 is not listed on IDEAS
    8. Lehmann, Daniel, 2020. "Quality of local equilibria in discrete exchange economies," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 141-152.
    9. Eric DuBois & Ashley Peper & Laura A. Albert, 2023. "Interdicting Attack Plans with Boundedly Rational Players and Multiple Attackers: An Adversarial Risk Analysis Approach," Decision Analysis, INFORMS, vol. 20(3), pages 202-219, September.
    10. Zhenning Zhang & Bin Liu & Yishui Wang & Dachuan Xu & Dongmei Zhang, 2022. "Maximizing a monotone non-submodular function under a knapsack constraint," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 43(5), pages 1125-1148, July.
    11. Lee, Heesang & Nemhauser, George L. & Wang, Yinhua, 1996. "Maximizing a submodular function by integer programming: Polyhedral results for the quadratic case," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 94(1), pages 154-166, October.
    12. Zhenning Zhang & Donglei Du & Yanjun Jiang & Chenchen Wu, 2021. "Maximizing DR-submodular+supermodular functions on the integer lattice subject to a cardinality constraint," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 80(3), pages 595-616, July.
    13. Awi Federgruen & Nan Yang, 2008. "Selecting a Portfolio of Suppliers Under Demand and Supply Risks," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 56(4), pages 916-936, August.
    14. Chenggang Wang & Zengfu Wang & Xiong Xu & Yuhang Hao, 2021. "A balanced sensor scheduling for multitarget localization in a distributed multiple-input multiple-output radar network," International Journal of Distributed Sensor Networks, , vol. 17(7), pages 15501477211, July.
    15. Xu, Jianhua & Johnson, Michael P. & Fischbeck, Paul S. & Small, Mitchell J. & VanBriesen, Jeanne M., 2010. "Robust placement of sensors in dynamic water distribution systems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 202(3), pages 707-716, May.
    16. Page, Scott E., 1997. "An appending efficient algorithm for allocating public projects with positive complementarities," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 64(3), pages 291-321, June.
    17. Yanzhi Li & Zhicheng Liu & Chuchu Xu & Ping Li & Xiaoyan Zhang & Hong Chang, 2023. "Two-stage submodular maximization under curvature," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 45(2), pages 1-16, March.
    18. Simon Bruggmann & Rico Zenklusen, 2019. "Submodular Maximization Through the Lens of Linear Programming," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 44(4), pages 1221-1244, November.
    19. Xiaojuan Zhang & Qian Liu & Min Li & Yang Zhou, 2022. "Fast algorithms for supermodular and non-supermodular minimization via bi-criteria strategy," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 44(5), pages 3549-3574, December.
    20. Hans Kellerer & Vitaly A. Strusevich, 2016. "Optimizing the half-product and related quadratic Boolean functions: approximation and scheduling applications," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 240(1), pages 39-94, May.
    21. Ivan Contreras & Elena Fernández, 2014. "Hub Location as the Minimization of a Supermodular Set Function," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 62(3), pages 557-570, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:jcomop:v:19:y:2010:i:3:d:10.1007_s10878-009-9259-0. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.