IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/ijsaem/v16y2025i4d10.1007_s13198-025-02768-7.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A comparative study of KooN configurations’ PFH formulas and new generalization

Author

Listed:
  • Hanane Omeiri

    (20 Août 1955 University)

  • Fares Innal

    (20 Août 1955 University)

Abstract

Safety instrumented systems (SISs) are considered as paramount safety barriers in nowadays industrial installations. The average probability of dangerous failure on demand (PFDavg) and the average failure frequency (PFH) are the main performance indicators related to SIS reliability. The aim of this paper is the study of different PFH formulas sets provided in the literature and the development of new formulas generalizations. The PFH formulas are associated with the commonly used KooN (K-out-of-N) configurations, namely: 1oo1, 1oo2, 2oo2, 2oo3 and 1oo3. More specifically, the considered PFH formulas are those given in IEC 61508 standard, PDS handbook, and the formulas newly developed by the authors of this paper based on Markov models. In particular, their underlying assumptions are highlighted and a comparative study between the numerical results they produce is performed and checked against the numerical values derived from Markov models. The examination of the obtained results showed that the IEC 61508 (first edition) formulas (slightly modified) and the newly developed ones provided very similar results that are close to those derived from Markov models. An illustrative example provided in the IEC 61508–6 has been studied through the calculation of its failure frequency using the different PFH formulas.

Suggested Citation

  • Hanane Omeiri & Fares Innal, 2025. "A comparative study of KooN configurations’ PFH formulas and new generalization," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 16(4), pages 1398-1408, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:ijsaem:v:16:y:2025:i:4:d:10.1007_s13198-025-02768-7
    DOI: 10.1007/s13198-025-02768-7
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s13198-025-02768-7
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s13198-025-02768-7?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jin, Hui & Rausand, Marvin, 2014. "Reliability of safety-instrumented systems subject to partial testing and common-cause failures," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 146-151.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chuan Wang & Yupeng Liu & Wen Hou & Chao Yu & Guorong Wang & Yuyan Zheng, 2021. "Reliability and availability modeling of Subsea Autonomous High Integrity Pressure Protection System with partial stroke test by Dynamic Bayesian," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 235(2), pages 268-281, April.
    2. Zhang, Nan & Cai, Kaiquan & Zhang, Jun & Wang, Tian, 2022. "A condition-based maintenance policy considering failure dependence and imperfect inspection for a two-component system," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 217(C).
    3. Ding, Long & Wang, Hong & Jiang, Jin & Xu, Aidong, 2017. "SIL verification for SRS with diverse redundancy based on system degradation using reliability block diagram," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 165(C), pages 170-187.
    4. Meng, Huixing & Kloul, Leïla & Rauzy, Antoine, 2018. "Modeling patterns for reliability assessment of safety instrumented systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 180(C), pages 111-123.
    5. Innal, Fares & Lundteigen, Mary Ann & Liu, Yiliu & Barros, Anne, 2016. "PFDavg generalized formulas for SIS subject to partial and full periodic tests based on multi-phase Markov models," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 160-170.
    6. Veljanovski, N. & ÄŒepin, M., 2024. "Event tree-based risk and financial assessment for power plants," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 247(C).
    7. Azizpour, Hooshyar & Lundteigen, Mary Ann, 2019. "Analysis of simplification in Markov-based models for performance assessment of Safety Instrumented System," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 183(C), pages 252-260.
    8. Wu, Shengnan & Zhang, Laibin & Zheng, Wenpei & Liu, Yiliu & Lundteigen, Mary Ann, 2019. "Reliability modeling of subsea SISs partial testing subject to delayed restoration," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    9. Gabriel, Angelito & Ozansoy, Cagil & Shi, Juan, 2018. "Developments in SIL determination and calculation," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 177(C), pages 148-161.
    10. Yu Han & Jianxing Yu & Chuan Wang & Xiaobo Xie & Chao Yu & Yupeng Liu, 2023. "A fault diagnosis method for the HIPPS of FPSO unit based on dynamic Bayesian network," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 237(4), pages 752-764, August.
    11. Chuan Wang & Jun Gou & Yingcheng Tian & Hao Jin & Chao Yu & Yupeng Liu & Jiajun Ma & Yong Xia, 2022. "Reliability and availability evaluation of subsea high integrity pressure protection system using stochastic Petri net," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 236(3), pages 508-521, June.
    12. Fort, Ada & Mugnaini, Marco & Vignoli, Valerio & Gaggii, Vittorio & Pieralli, Moreno, 2015. "Fault tolerant design of a field data modular readout architecture for railway applications," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 456-462.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:ijsaem:v:16:y:2025:i:4:d:10.1007_s13198-025-02768-7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.