IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/hecrev/v15y2025i1d10.1186_s13561-024-00589-1.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Modelling epidemiological and economics processes – the case of cervical cancer

Author

Listed:
  • Franziska Taeger

    (University of Greifswald)

  • Lena Mende

    (University of Greifswald)

  • Steffen Fleßa

    (University of Greifswald)

Abstract

Different types of mathematical models can be used to forecast the development of diseases as well as associated costs and analyse the cost-effectiveness of interventions. The set of models available to assess these parameters, reach from simple independent equations to highly complex agent-based simulations. For many diseases, it is simple to distinguish between infectious diseases and chronic-degenerative diseases. For infectious diseases, dynamic models are most appropriate because they allow for feedback from the number of infected to the number of new infections, while for the latter Markov models are more appropriate since this feedback is not required. However, for some diseases, the aforementioned distinction is not as clear. Cervical cancer, for instance, is caused by a sexually transmitted virus, and therefore falls under the definition of an infectious disease. However, once infected, the condition can progress to a chronic disease. Consequently, cervical cancer could be considered an infectious or a chronic-degenerative disease, depending on the stage of infection. In this paper, we will analyse the applicability of different mathematical models for epidemiological and economic processes focusing on cervical cancer. For this purpose, we will present the basic structure of different models. We will then conduct a literature analysis of the mathematical models used to predict the spread of cervical cancer. Based on these findings we will draw conclusions about which models can be used for which purpose and which disease. We conclude that each type of model has its advantages and disadvantages, but the choice of model type often seems arbitrary. In the case of cervical cancer, homogenous Markov models seem appropriate if a cohort of newly infected is followed for a shorter period, for instance, to assess the impact of screening programs. For long-term consequences, such as the impact of a vaccination program, a feedback loop from former infections to the future likelihood of infections is required. This can be done using system dynamics or inhomogeneous Markov models. Discrete event or agent-based simulations can be used in the case of cervical cancer when small cohorts or specific characteristics of individuals are required. However, these models require more effort than Markov or System Dynamics models.

Suggested Citation

  • Franziska Taeger & Lena Mende & Steffen Fleßa, 2025. "Modelling epidemiological and economics processes – the case of cervical cancer," Health Economics Review, Springer, vol. 15(1), pages 1-20, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:hecrev:v:15:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1186_s13561-024-00589-1
    DOI: 10.1186/s13561-024-00589-1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1186/s13561-024-00589-1
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1186/s13561-024-00589-1?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Elizabeth Hunter & Brian Mac Namee & John D. Kelleher, 2017. "A Taxonomy for Agent-Based Models in Human Infectious Disease Epidemiology," Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, vol. 20(3), pages 1-2.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ali Asgary & Hudson Blue & Adriano O. Solis & Zachary McCarthy & Mahdi Najafabadi & Mohammad Ali Tofighi & Jianhong Wu, 2022. "Modeling COVID-19 Outbreaks in Long-Term Care Facilities Using an Agent-Based Modeling and Simulation Approach," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(5), pages 1-16, February.
    2. Talal Daghriri & Michael Proctor & Sarah Matthews, 2022. "Evolution of Select Epidemiological Modeling and the Rise of Population Sentiment Analysis: A Literature Review and COVID-19 Sentiment Illustration," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(6), pages 1-20, March.
    3. Elizabeth Hunter & Brian Mac Namee & John D. Kelleher, 2020. "A Model for the Spread of Infectious Diseases in a Region," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(9), pages 1-19, April.
    4. Winston Garira, 2020. "The research and development process for multiscale models of infectious disease systems," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(4), pages 1-39, April.
    5. Jagoda Kaszowska-Mojsa & Przemyslaw Wlodarczyk, 2020. "To freeze or not to freeze? Epidemic prevention and control in the DSGE model with agent-based epidemic component," Lodz Economics Working Papers 3/2020, University of Lodz, Faculty of Economics and Sociology.
    6. Bisin, Alberto & Moro, Andrea, 2022. "JUE insight: Learning epidemiology by doing: The empirical implications of a Spatial-SIR model with behavioral responses," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 127(C).
    7. Yifan Wu & Fan Zhang & Albert P. C. Chan & Dezhi Li, 2025. "Sentiment Evolution of Online Public Opinion of Emergency Situations in Railway Stations: A Case Study of Wuhan Railway Stations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(2), pages 1-29, January.
    8. Winston Garira & Kizito Muzhinji, 2023. "The Universal Theory for Multiscale Modelling of Infectious Disease Dynamics," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(18), pages 1-40, September.
    9. Elizabeth Hunter & Brian Mac Namee & John Kelleher, 2018. "An open-data-driven agent-based model to simulate infectious disease outbreaks," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(12), pages 1-35, December.
    10. Priscilla Avegliano & Jaime Simão Sichman, 2023. "Equation-Based Versus Agent-Based Models: Why Not Embrace Both for an Efficient Parameter Calibration?," Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, vol. 26(4), pages 1-3.
    11. Florian Miksch & Beate Jahn & Kurt Junshean Espinosa & Jagpreet Chhatwal & Uwe Siebert & Nikolas Popper, 2019. "Why should we apply ABM for decision analysis for infectious diseases?—An example for dengue interventions," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(8), pages 1-19, August.
    12. Pilar Hernández & Carlos Pena & Alberto Ramos & Juan José Gómez-Cadenas, 2021. "A new formulation of compartmental epidemic modelling for arbitrary distributions of incubation and removal times," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(2), pages 1-22, February.
    13. Beate Jahn & Sarah Friedrich & Joachim Behnke & Joachim Engel & Ursula Garczarek & Ralf Münnich & Markus Pauly & Adalbert Wilhelm & Olaf Wolkenhauer & Markus Zwick & Uwe Siebert & Tim Friede, 2022. "On the role of data, statistics and decisions in a pandemic," AStA Advances in Statistical Analysis, Springer;German Statistical Society, vol. 106(3), pages 349-382, September.
    14. Andrea Guazzini & Mirko Duradoni & Alessandro Lazzeri & Giorgio Gronchi, 2018. "Simulating the Cost of Cooperation: A Recipe for Collaborative Problem-Solving," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-17, June.
    15. Shaheen A Abdulkareem & Ellen-Wien Augustijn & Tatiana Filatova & Katarzyna Musial & Yaseen T Mustafa, 2020. "Risk perception and behavioral change during epidemics: Comparing models of individual and collective learning," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(1), pages 1-22, January.
    16. Constanza Fosco & Felipe Zurita, 2021. "Assessing the short-run effects of lockdown policies on economic activity, with an application to the Santiago Metropolitan Region, Chile," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(6), pages 1-23, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:hecrev:v:15:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1186_s13561-024-00589-1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com/economics/journal/13561 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.