IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/eurphb/v98y2025i9d10.1140_epjb_s10051-025-01005-1.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Geometrical distribution of agents based on a generalised Potts model

Author

Listed:
  • Alejandro Rivero

    (Universidad de Zaragoza
    Kampal Data Solutions)

  • Alfonso Tarancón

    (Universidad de Zaragoza
    Universidad de Zaragoza, Campus San Francisco)

  • Carlos Tarancón

    (Kampal Data Solutions)

Abstract

In collective local interaction systems with agents assigned to different profiles (categories, traits), the distribution of such profiles in the neighbourhood of any agent affects the exchange of ideas, a basic element in Collective Intelligence experiments. It is important to control this distribution experimentally, asking for criteria that should range from maximum homogeneity to maximum difference. We suggest a method where we obtain these criteria by adding an extra interaction term to the Q-state Potts model, producing a rich vacuum structure. By controlling the two parameters of the model, we can obtain different patterns for the geometrical distribution of the agents. We study the transitions and phase diagram of this model, considering the physics at constant magnetization, and show that the states correspond to a large diversity of mixing patterns, directly applicable to agent distribution in CI experiments. Graphical abstract

Suggested Citation

  • Alejandro Rivero & Alfonso Tarancón & Carlos Tarancón, 2025. "Geometrical distribution of agents based on a generalised Potts model," The European Physical Journal B: Condensed Matter and Complex Systems, Springer;EDP Sciences, vol. 98(9), pages 1-8, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:eurphb:v:98:y:2025:i:9:d:10.1140_epjb_s10051-025-01005-1
    DOI: 10.1140/epjb/s10051-025-01005-1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1140/epjb/s10051-025-01005-1
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1140/epjb/s10051-025-01005-1?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hildegard Meyer-Ortmanns, 2003. "Immigration, Integration And Ghetto Formation," International Journal of Modern Physics C (IJMPC), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 14(03), pages 311-320.
    2. L. Gauvin & J. Vannimenus & J.-P. Nadal, 2009. "Phase diagram of a Schelling segregation model," The European Physical Journal B: Condensed Matter and Complex Systems, Springer;EDP Sciences, vol. 70(2), pages 293-304, July.
    3. Alexander J. Stewart & Mohsen Mosleh & Marina Diakonova & Antonio A. Arechar & David G. Rand & Joshua B. Plotkin, 2019. "Information gerrymandering and undemocratic decisions," Nature, Nature, vol. 573(7772), pages 117-121, September.
    4. Christian Schulze, 2005. "Potts-Like Model For Ghetto Formation In Multi-Cultural Societies," International Journal of Modern Physics C (IJMPC), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 16(03), pages 351-355.
    5. D. Stauffer & H. Meyer-Ortmanns, 2004. "SIMULATION OF CONSENSUS MODEL OF DEFFUANTet al.ON A BARABÁSI–ALBERT NETWORK," International Journal of Modern Physics C (IJMPC), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 15(02), pages 241-246.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Anand Sahasranaman & Henrik Jeldtoft Jensen, 2017. "Cooperative dynamics of neighborhood economic status in cities," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(8), pages 1-15, August.
    2. Zhang, Hong, 2022. "Effects of stubborn players and noise on the evolution of cooperation in spatial prisoner’s dilemma game," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 165(P1).
    3. repec:cup:judgdm:v:16:y:2021:i:6:p:1413-1438 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. Clémentine Cottineau, 2022. "Modeling Inequalities in Geographical Space," Post-Print halshs-04828670, HAL.
    5. Jacqueline N. Zadelaar & Joost A. Agelink van Rentergem & Jessica V. Schaaf & Tycho J. Dekkers & Nathalie de Vent & Laura M. S. Dekkers & Maria C. Olthof & Brenda R. J. Jansen & Hilde M. Huizenga, 2021. "Development of decision making based on internal and external information: A hierarchical Bayesian approach," Judgment and Decision Making, Society for Judgment and Decision Making, vol. 16(6), pages 1413-1438, November.
    6. Tsvetkova, Milena & Olsson, Henrik & Galesic, Mirta, 2024. "Social networks affect redistribution decisions and polarization," OSF Preprints bw7ux_v1, Center for Open Science.
    7. Guifeng Su & Yi Zhang, 2023. "Significant suppression of segregation in Schelling’s metapopulation model with star-type underlying topology," The European Physical Journal B: Condensed Matter and Complex Systems, Springer;EDP Sciences, vol. 96(7), pages 1-6, July.
    8. Anand Sahasranaman & Henrik Jeldtoft Jensen, 2018. "Ethnicity and wealth: The dynamics of dual segregation," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(10), pages 1-22, October.
    9. Sanyukta Deshpande & Ian G. Ludden & Sheldon H. Jacobson, 2025. "Bias in the ballot: how votemandering exploits gerrymandering and campaign strategies," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 352(1), pages 121-168, September.
    10. Pei, Shan & Cressman, Ross & Zhang, Boyu, 2024. "Dynamic games on arbitrary networks with two types of players," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 113(C).
    11. Amaud Banos, 2012. "Network Effects in Schelling's Model of Segregation: New Evidence from Agent-Based Simulation," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 39(2), pages 393-405, April.
    12. Mohsen Mosleh & Alexander J. Stewart & Joshua B. Plotkin & David G. Rand, 2020. "Prosociality in the economic Dictator Game is associated with less parochialism and greater willingness to vote for intergroup compromise," Judgment and Decision Making, Society for Judgment and Decision Making, vol. 15(1), pages 1-6, January.
    13. Philipp Lorenz-Spreen & Stephan Lewandowsky & Cass R. Sunstein & Ralph Hertwig, 2020. "How behavioural sciences can promote truth, autonomy and democratic discourse online," Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 4(11), pages 1102-1109, November.
    14. Ortega, Diego & Rodríguez-Laguna, Javier & Korutcheva, Elka, 2021. "A Schelling model with a variable threshold in a closed city segregation model. Analysis of the universality classes," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 574(C).
    15. Christoph Aymanns & Jakob Foerster & Co-Pierre Georg & Matthias Weber, 2017. "Fake News in Social Networks," Papers 1708.06233, arXiv.org, revised Oct 2025.
    16. Shin, J.K. & Jung, P.S., 2013. "Analysis of phase transition points for a two-color agent-based model," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 392(8), pages 1863-1872.
    17. Lye, Ribin & Tan, James Peng Lung & Cheong, Siew Ann, 2012. "Understanding agent-based models of financial markets: A bottom–up approach based on order parameters and phase diagrams," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 391(22), pages 5521-5531.
    18. Pablo Medina & Eric Goles & Roberto Zarama & Sergio Rica, 2017. "Self-Organized Societies: On the Sakoda Model of Social Interactions," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2017, pages 1-16, January.
    19. Caridi, I. & Pinasco, J.P. & Saintier, N. & Schiaffino, P., 2017. "Characterizing segregation in the Schelling–Voter model," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 487(C), pages 125-142.
    20. Caridi, Inés & Nemiña, Francisco & Pinasco, Juan P. & Schiaffino, Pablo, 2013. "Schelling-voter model: An application to language competition," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 216-221.
    21. Astrid Dannenberg & Gunnar Gutsche & Marlene Batzke & Sven Christens & Daniel Engler & Fabian Mankat & Sophia Moeller & Eva Weingaertner & Andreas Ernst & Marcel Lumkowsky & Georg von Wangenheim & Ger, 2022. "The effects of norms on environmental behavior," MAGKS Papers on Economics 202219, Philipps-Universität Marburg, Faculty of Business Administration and Economics, Department of Economics (Volkswirtschaftliche Abteilung).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:eurphb:v:98:y:2025:i:9:d:10.1140_epjb_s10051-025-01005-1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.