IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/eurphb/v94y2021i6d10.1140_epjb_s10051-021-00135-6.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Game theoretic-based modelling of Krishna waters dispute: equilibrium solutions by hypergame analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Durga Prasad Panday

    (University of Petroleum and Energy Studies)

  • Rakesh Khosa

    (Indian Institute of Technology Delhi)

  • Rathinasamy Maheswaran

    (MVGR College of Engineering)

  • K. Ravikumar

    (VNR Vignana Jyothi Institute of Engineering and Technology)

  • Ankit Agarwal

    (Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee
    GFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences)

Abstract

This paper presents a hyper game analysis of the Krishna waters dispute and demonstrates its potential to yield an equilibrium solution even in the face of uncertainty that may be plausible in the intent behind the apparent position taken by contending parties. The approach can accommodate the real-world conflict situation in which players conceal their negotiating strategies and develop perceptions about apparent positions that may be misperceived. The hypergame model of the conflict formulated to resolve the water-sharing dispute amongst the riparian states of Maharashtra, Karnataka, Telangana and Andhra Pradesh, India. The paper demonstrates the potential of hypergame-based conflict resolution model to yield an equilibrium solution elegantly and which appears to have attributes of a “Fair and Equitable”” allocation. Hypergame is formulated by considering the perception of one player about the other ’players’ game. All the possible perceptions are taken, and the stability analysis is carried out. The results of the stability analysis show that Fair and equitable allocation is part of the equilibrium solution. Our analysis demonstrates that the game-theoretic technique can be applied to solve any real-world conflict. Any allocation made based on “Fairness and Equity” undoubtedly lead to the equilibrium solution as seen in the present work. Graphic abstract

Suggested Citation

  • Durga Prasad Panday & Rakesh Khosa & Rathinasamy Maheswaran & K. Ravikumar & Ankit Agarwal, 2021. "Game theoretic-based modelling of Krishna waters dispute: equilibrium solutions by hypergame analysis," The European Physical Journal B: Condensed Matter and Complex Systems, Springer;EDP Sciences, vol. 94(6), pages 1-11, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:eurphb:v:94:y:2021:i:6:d:10.1140_epjb_s10051-021-00135-6
    DOI: 10.1140/epjb/s10051-021-00135-6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1140/epjb/s10051-021-00135-6
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1140/epjb/s10051-021-00135-6?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Durga Prasad Panday & Rakesh Khosa & Rathinasamy Maheswaran & K. Ravikumar & Ankit Agarwal, 2021. "Game-theoretic-based modelling of Krishna waters dispute: equilibrium solutions by Metagame Analysis," The European Physical Journal B: Condensed Matter and Complex Systems, Springer;EDP Sciences, vol. 94(5), pages 1-12, May.
    2. Takahashi, Masao Allyn & Fraser, Niall M. & Hipel, Keith W., 1984. "A procedure for analyzing hypergames," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 18(1), pages 111-122, October.
    3. Jorge Alcalde-Unzu & María Gómez-Rúa & Elena Molis, 2021. "Allocating the costs of cleaning a river: expected responsibility versus median responsibility," International Journal of Game Theory, Springer;Game Theory Society, vol. 50(1), pages 185-214, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. K. Ravikumar & Rakesh Khosa & Ankit Agarwal, 2021. "Metagame analysis of Cauvery River dispute incorporating interannual variability in virgin runoff potential of the basin," The European Physical Journal B: Condensed Matter and Complex Systems, Springer;EDP Sciences, vol. 94(8), pages 1-12, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Durga Prasad Panday & Rakesh Khosa & Rathinasamy Maheswaran & K. Ravikumar & Ankit Agarwal, 2021. "Game-theoretic-based modelling of Krishna waters dispute: equilibrium solutions by Metagame Analysis," The European Physical Journal B: Condensed Matter and Complex Systems, Springer;EDP Sciences, vol. 94(5), pages 1-12, May.
    2. K. Ravikumar & Rakesh Khosa & Ankit Agarwal, 2021. "Metagame analysis of Cauvery River dispute incorporating interannual variability in virgin runoff potential of the basin," The European Physical Journal B: Condensed Matter and Complex Systems, Springer;EDP Sciences, vol. 94(8), pages 1-12, August.
    3. Valencia-Toledo, Alfredo & Vidal-Puga, Juan, 2023. "A linear model for freight transportation," MPRA Paper 119301, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    4. Acosta-Vega, Rick K. & Algaba, Encarnación & Sánchez-Soriano, Joaquín, 2023. "Design of water quality policies based on proportionality in multi-issue problems with crossed claims," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 311(2), pages 777-788.
    5. Green, Kesten C., 2002. "Embroiled in a conflict: who do you call?," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 18(3), pages 389-395.
    6. Elselt, H. A., 1998. "Perception and information in a competitive location model," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 108(1), pages 94-105, July.
    7. Inohara, Takehiro, 2007. "Relational dominant strategy equilibrium as a generalization of dominant strategy equilibrium in terms of a social psychological aspect of decision making," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 182(2), pages 856-866, October.
    8. Jens Gudmundsson & Jens Leth Hougaard, 2021. "River pollution abatement: Decentralized solutions and smart contracts," IFRO Working Paper 2021/07, University of Copenhagen, Department of Food and Resource Economics, revised Oct 2021.
    9. Keith W. Hipel & Liping Fang & D. Marc Kilgour, 2020. "The Graph Model for Conflict Resolution: Reflections on Three Decades of Development," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 29(1), pages 11-60, February.
    10. Yasir M. Aljefri & Liping Fang & Keith W. Hipel & Kaveh Madani, 2019. "Strategic Analyses of the Hydropolitical Conflicts Surrounding the Grand Ethiopian Renaissance Dam," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 28(2), pages 305-340, April.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:eurphb:v:94:y:2021:i:6:d:10.1140_epjb_s10051-021-00135-6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.