IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/eurasi/v15y2025i2d10.1007_s40821-025-00297-8.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Work organization, gender and workforce transition to non-employment in OECD countries

Author

Listed:
  • Ekaterina Kalugina

    (EPEE, University Evry Paris-Saclay, Cnam CEET and TEPP)

  • Nathalie Greenan

    (Cnam, Lirsa, CEET and TEPP)

  • Mouhamadou Moustapha Niang

    (Ministry of Justice)

Abstract

This paper examines the relationship between forms of work organisation and transition of the workforce to non-employment with a special focus on gender differences. It relies on a rich database merging micro data from the survey on adult skills (PIAAC, cycle 1) and macro-level information on 28 OECD countries to account for the interaction between structural heterogeneities and micro-level characteristics of the workplaces. Five forms of work organisation are identified based on the description given by employees of their activities in their job and characterising the way knowledge, learning and discretion are shaped at the workplace level: Discretionary learning, Constrained learning, Independent, Simple and Taylorist. Their relationship with transitions to non-employment, defined as the probability to change from employment to non-employment over a one-year period, is then assessed. This probability is interpreted as vulnerability to non-employment. The analysis reveals a significant influence of forms of work organisation for both men and women with the least vulnerable employees working in Discretionary learning forms when those in Taylorist settings are more at risk. Gender specific determinants also appear to be notable. On the individual level, educational pathways are very important for men, while for women family status, family responsibilities as well as occupation matter more. On the country level, economic growth and R&D performance reinforce the protective effect of some forms of work organisation for men highlighting the role of broader economic and institutional environments, while women are better off in countries where the opportunities for adult education are more widespread, showcasing the importance of continuous learning and skill development.

Suggested Citation

  • Ekaterina Kalugina & Nathalie Greenan & Mouhamadou Moustapha Niang, 2025. "Work organization, gender and workforce transition to non-employment in OECD countries," Eurasian Business Review, Springer;Eurasia Business and Economics Society, vol. 15(2), pages 517-561, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:eurasi:v:15:y:2025:i:2:d:10.1007_s40821-025-00297-8
    DOI: 10.1007/s40821-025-00297-8
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40821-025-00297-8
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s40821-025-00297-8?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Workforce transition to non-employment; Work organization; Gender; Public policy and institutions;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • J21 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demand and Supply of Labor - - - Labor Force and Employment, Size, and Structure
    • J63 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Mobility, Unemployment, Vacancies, and Immigrant Workers - - - Turnover; Vacancies; Layoffs
    • J81 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Labor Standards - - - Working Conditions
    • L23 - Industrial Organization - - Firm Objectives, Organization, and Behavior - - - Organization of Production
    • O57 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economywide Country Studies - - - Comparative Studies of Countries

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:eurasi:v:15:y:2025:i:2:d:10.1007_s40821-025-00297-8. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.