IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/envsyd/v42y2022i2d10.1007_s10669-022-09849-z.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Brewery industrial wastewater treatment through mesocosm horizontal subsurface flow constructed wetland

Author

Listed:
  • Kenatu Angassa

    (Addis Ababa Science, and Technology University)

  • Berhanu Assefa

    (Addis Ababa Institute of Technology)

  • Kebede K. Kefeni

    (University of South Africa, Florida Science Campus)

  • Thabo T. I. Nkambule

    (University of South Africa, Florida Science Campus)

  • Jemal Fito

    (University of South Africa, Florida Science Campus)

Abstract

The brewing industry discharges huge amounts of wastewater, which contains a high concentration of organic and nutrient-rich components. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the treatment performance of Horizontal-Subsurface-Flow-Constructed Wetland Systems (HSSFCWs) for brewery wastewater remediation. A mesocosm HSSFCWs was constructed and the inside of each unit was covered with high-density polyethylene and filled with gravel. The HSSFCWs were planted with Colocasia gigantean, Phragmites karka, and Canna indica while the control treatment unit was left unplanted. The HSSFCWs were operated with a hydraulic loading rate of 21.7 Lm−2 day−1 and a hydraulic residence time of 7 days. The removal efficiencies of the primary clarifier for COD, BOD5, and TSS were found to be 65.5%, 67.0%, and 98.0%, respectively. The treatment performances of the HSSFCWs with P. karka, C. gigantean and C. indica were COD 80.3%, 79.0%, and 73.6%; BOD5 75.4%, 74.0% and 73.6%; TN 84.0%, 77.0% and 64.0%; TP 71.0%, 69.0% and 63.0%; and PO43− 85.7%, 80.0% and 79.0%, respectively. Compared to the other two treatment systems, the species P. karka achieved the best treatment performance in terms of the removal of organic matter and nutrients. In general, it can be concluded that the wetland systems planted with P. karka, C. gigantean, and C. indica have the potential to remove organic matter and nutrients from brewery wastewater. Therefore, this finding is encouraging to scale up this wastewater treatment practice at an industrial level as alternative industrial wastewater remediation.

Suggested Citation

  • Kenatu Angassa & Berhanu Assefa & Kebede K. Kefeni & Thabo T. I. Nkambule & Jemal Fito, 2022. "Brewery industrial wastewater treatment through mesocosm horizontal subsurface flow constructed wetland," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 42(2), pages 265-275, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:envsyd:v:42:y:2022:i:2:d:10.1007_s10669-022-09849-z
    DOI: 10.1007/s10669-022-09849-z
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10669-022-09849-z
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10669-022-09849-z?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Herrera, Veronica, 2019. "Reconciling global aspirations and local realities: Challenges facing the Sustainable Development Goals for water and sanitation," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 106-117.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Alma Elisabeth Peirson & Gina Ziervogel, 2021. "Sanitation Upgrading as Climate Action: Lessons for Local Government from a Community Informal Settlement Project in Cape Town," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-18, August.
    2. Jemal Fito & Stijn W. H. Hulle, 2021. "Wastewater reclamation and reuse potentials in agriculture: towards environmental sustainability," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(3), pages 2949-2972, March.
    3. Kherbache, Nabil & Oukaci, Kamal, 2020. "Assessment of capital expenditure in achieving sanitation-related MDG targets and the uncertainties of the SDG targets in Algeria," World Development Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 19(C).
    4. Marisha Lamond & Bhim Adhikari, 2020. "Assessing the Sustainability of Sanitation Systems in Peri-Urban Areas: Insights from Nepal," Journal of Development Innovations, KarmaQuest International, vol. 4(2), pages 43-62, December.
    5. Love Kumar & Ramna Kumari & Avinash Kumar & Imran Aziz Tunio & Claudio Sassanelli, 2023. "Water Quality Assessment and Monitoring in Pakistan: A Comprehensive Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-38, April.
    6. Dias, Vitor M. & Soares, Pedro Paulo de Miranda Araújo & Brondizio, Eduardo S. & Cruz, Sandra Helena Ribeiro, 2021. "Grassroots mobilization in Brazil’s urban Amazon: Global investments, persistent floods, and local resistance across political and legal arenas," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 146(C).
    7. Ting Guan & Ke Meng & Wei Liu & Lan Xue, 2019. "Public Attitudes toward Sustainable Development Goals: Evidence from Five Chinese Cities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(20), pages 1-20, October.
    8. Baskaran Venkatesh & R Velkennedy, 2023. "Formulation of citizen science approach for monitoring Sustainable Development Goal 6: Clean water and sanitation for an Indian city," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 31(1), pages 56-66, February.
    9. Beard, Victoria A. & Mitlin, Diana, 2021. "Water access in global South cities: The challenges of intermittency and affordability," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 147(C).
    10. Silvana Pacheco-Treviño & Mario G. Manzano-Camarillo, 2024. "The Socioeconomic Dimensions of Water Scarcity in Urban and Rural Mexico: A Comprehensive Assessment of Sustainable Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-20, January.
    11. Venkatesh Baskaran & Velkennedy R, 2022. "A systematic review on the role of geographical information systems in monitoring and achieving sustainable development goal 6: Clean water and sanitation," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 30(5), pages 1417-1425, October.
    12. Ajishnu Roy & Aman Basu & Yanyu Su & Yan Li & Xuhui Dong, 2022. "Understanding Recent Trends in Global Sustainable Development Goal 6 Research: Scientometric, Text Mining and an Improved Framework for Future Research," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-23, February.
    13. Soumya Balasubramanya & David Stifel & Muzna Alvi & Claudia Ringler, 2022. "The role of social identity in improving access to water, sanitation and hygiene (WASH) and health services: Evidence from Nepal," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 40(4), July.
    14. Lisa Bagnoli & Salvador Bertomeu-Sanchez & Antonio Estache & Maria Vagliasindi, 2023. "Does the ownership of utilities matter for social outcomes? A survey of the evidence for developing countries," Journal of Economic Policy Reform, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(1), pages 24-43, January.
    15. Carvalho, Anne Emília Costa & Sampaio, Raquel Menezes Bezerra & Sampaio, Luciano Menezes Bezerra, 2023. "The impact of regulation on the Brazilian water and sewerage companies’ efficiency," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 87(PA).
    16. Revilla, Ma. Laarni D. & Qu, Fangqi & Seetharam, K E & Rao, Bhanoji, 2021. "“Sanitation” in the Top Development Journals: A Review," ADBI Working Papers 1253, Asian Development Bank Institute.
    17. Maria Inês Pedrosa Nahas & Rodrigo Coelho Carvalho & Léo Heller, 2023. "A Framework to Assess and Monitor Human Rights to Water and Sanitation at the Municipal Scale: A Study case in the Belo Horizonte Metropolitan Region," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 168(1), pages 645-665, August.
    18. Lisa Bagnoli & Salvador Bertomeu & Antonio Estache & Maria Vagliasindi, 2020. "Are the Poor Better Off with Public or Private Utilities ?A Survey of the Academic Evidence on Developing Economies," Working Papers ECARES 2020-24, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
    19. Md. Sujahangir Kabir Sarkar & Mahesti Okitasari & Md. Rajibul Ahsan & Abul Quasem Al-Amin, 2022. "Localisation of Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) in Bangladesh: An Inclusive Framework under Local Governments," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-19, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:envsyd:v:42:y:2022:i:2:d:10.1007_s10669-022-09849-z. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.