IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/endesu/v21y2019i3d10.1007_s10668-018-0096-0.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Thermal performance of three improved biomass-fired cookstoves using fuel wood, wood pellets and coconut shell

Author

Listed:
  • Pravin R. Sonarkar

    (Visvesvaraya National Institute of Technology)

  • Ashish S. Chaurasia

    (Visvesvaraya National Institute of Technology)

Abstract

India produces 500 million metric tones of renewable agricultural biomass every year, primarily used as a cooking fuel. Inefficient combustion of biomass is one of the major hindrances for the effective utilization of this vast reserve of energy. Inefficient combustion may occur due to several factors such as lack of proper air circulation, improper packing of fuel and excess moisture content in the fuel. This paper describes the performance evaluation of three improved stoves; natural draft TLUD stove and forced draft Purti and Mpurti stove using three kinds of biomass fuel as wood chips, wood pellets and coconut shell. It was found that the thermal efficiency of the natural draft TLUD stove was 26–27%, electric fan operated Purti stove was 44–45%, and solar fan operated Mpurti stove was 46–48%. This performance was assessed by the standard laboratory-based water boiling test method (WBT) to get thermal efficiency, burning rate, boiling point, specific fuel consumption and firepower. The economic analysis study was carried out to get an idea about the approximate cost that would be incurred per month on the fuel. All these desirable parameters are maximized for the efficient combustion of fuel. The gaseous components like CO and CO2 obtained over the fuel bed are analyzed using gas chromatography. Particulate matter (PM2.5) was measured by the fine particulate sampler. PM2.5 concentration for traditional cookstoves was much higher than studied forced draft Mpurti (510 ± 45 μg/m3) and Purti stove (677 ± 40 μg/m3). The reduction in the indoor concentration of PM2.5 for Mpurti is about 60–63% as compared to traditional stove. Mean CO emissions on a volumetric basis during the cold start and hot start phase were lowest for Mpurti forced draft stove (2.41%). The study reveals that clean cooking can be achieved using the forced draft Mpurti stove.

Suggested Citation

  • Pravin R. Sonarkar & Ashish S. Chaurasia, 2019. "Thermal performance of three improved biomass-fired cookstoves using fuel wood, wood pellets and coconut shell," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 21(3), pages 1429-1449, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:endesu:v:21:y:2019:i:3:d:10.1007_s10668-018-0096-0
    DOI: 10.1007/s10668-018-0096-0
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10668-018-0096-0
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10668-018-0096-0?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Arora, Pooja & Jain, Suresh, 2016. "A review of chronological development in cookstove assessment methods: Challenges and way forward," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 203-220.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ekaterina A. Syrtsova & Ekaterina D. Ivantsova & Alexandra S. Miskiv & Evgeniya V. Zander & Anton I. Pyzhev, 2024. "Costs of Coal Abatement for Residential Heating to Reduce Urban Air Pollution in Asian Russia: Evidence from Krasnoyarsk," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(3), pages 1-15, January.
    2. Jayant Kumar & Savita Vyas, 2025. "Comprehensive review of biomass utilization and gasification for sustainable energy production," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 27(3), pages 1-40, March.
    3. Liang Zhu & Fangbin Wang & Jing Qi, 2024. "Washing walnut shells with the aqueous part of pyrolysis liquids: effect on biomass and pyrolysis product quality," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(11), pages 29169-29187, November.
    4. Nikolaos Savvakis & Stavroula Tournaki & Dimitra Tarasi & Nikos Kallergis & Tryfon Daras & Theocharis Tsoutsos, 2022. "Environmental effects from the use of traditional biomass for heating in rural areas: a case study of Anogeia, Crete," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(4), pages 5473-5495, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lombardi, Francesco & Colombo, Luigi & Colombo, Emanuela, 2017. "Design and validation of a Cooking Stoves Thermal Performance Simulator (Cook-STePS) to simulate water heating procedures in selected conditions," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 1384-1392.
    2. Yohannes Biru Aemro & Pedro Moura & Aníbal T. Almeida, 2021. "Inefficient cooking systems a challenge for sustainable development: a case of rural areas of Sub-Saharan Africa," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(10), pages 14697-14721, October.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:endesu:v:21:y:2019:i:3:d:10.1007_s10668-018-0096-0. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.