IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/comgts/v1y2004i3p311-327.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evolving technical trading rules for spot foreign-exchange markets using grammatical evolution

Author

Listed:
  • Anthony Brabazon
  • Michael O’Neill

Abstract

Grammatical Evolution (GE) is a novel, data-driven, model-induction tool, inspired by the biological gene-to-protein mapping process. This study provides an introduction to GE, and applies the methodology in an attempt to uncover useful technical trading rules which can be used to trade foreign exchange markets. In this study, each of the evolved rules (programs) represents a market trading system. The form of these programs is not specified ex-ante, but emerges by means of an evolutionary process. Daily US-DM, US-Stg and US-Yen exchange rates for the period 1992 to 1997 are used to train and test the model. The findings suggest that the developed rules earn positive returns in hold-out sample test periods, after allowing for trading and slippage costs. This suggests potential for future research to determine whether further refinement of the methodology adopted in this study could improve the returns earned by the developed rules. It is also noted that this novel methodology has general utility for rule-induction, and data mining applications. Copyright Springer-Verlag Berlin/Heidelberg 2004

Suggested Citation

  • Anthony Brabazon & Michael O’Neill, 2004. "Evolving technical trading rules for spot foreign-exchange markets using grammatical evolution," Computational Management Science, Springer, vol. 1(3), pages 311-327, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:comgts:v:1:y:2004:i:3:p:311-327
    DOI: 10.1007/s10287-004-0018-5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/s10287-004-0018-5
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10287-004-0018-5?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Alexandros Agapitos & Anthony Brabazon & Michael O’Neill, 2017. "Regularised gradient boosting for financial time-series modelling," Computational Management Science, Springer, vol. 14(3), pages 367-391, July.
    2. Gianni Filograsso & Giacomo Tollo, 2023. "Adaptive evolutionary algorithms for portfolio selection problems," Computational Management Science, Springer, vol. 20(1), pages 1-38, December.
    3. Pedro Godinho, 2012. "Can abnormal returns be earned on bandwidth-bounded currencies? Evidence from a genetic algorithm," Economic Issues Journal Articles, Economic Issues, vol. 17(1), pages 1-26, March.
    4. Luís Lobato Macedo & Pedro Godinho & Maria João Alves, 2020. "A Comparative Study of Technical Trading Strategies Using a Genetic Algorithm," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 55(1), pages 349-381, January.
    5. George Albanis & Roy Batchelor, 2007. "Combining heterogeneous classifiers for stock selection," Intelligent Systems in Accounting, Finance and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 15(1‐2), pages 1-21, January.
    6. Ivan Contreras & Remei Calm & Miguel A. Sainz & Pau Herrero & Josep Vehi, 2021. "Combining Grammatical Evolution with Modal Interval Analysis: An Application to Solve Problems with Uncertainty," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(6), pages 1-20, March.
    7. Manahov, Viktor & Hudson, Robert & Gebka, Bartosz, 2014. "Does high frequency trading affect technical analysis and market efficiency? And if so, how?," Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Elsevier, vol. 28(C), pages 131-157.
    8. Christian Oesch & Dietmar Maringer, 2017. "Low-latency liquidity inefficiency strategies," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(5), pages 717-727, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:comgts:v:1:y:2004:i:3:p:311-327. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.