IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/aphecp/v22y2024i2d10.1007_s40258-023-00864-y.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Limitations and Potentials of Evaluating Economic Aspects of Community-Based Health Promotion: A Critical Review

Author

Listed:
  • Philipp Weber

    (Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg)

  • Leonie Birkholz

    (Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg)

  • Riccarda Straub

    (Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg)

  • Simone Kohler

    (Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg)

  • Natalie Helsper

    (Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg)

  • Lea Dippon

    (Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg)

  • Klaus Pfeifer

    (Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg)

  • Alfred Rütten

    (Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg)

  • Jana Semrau

    (Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg)

Abstract

Community-based health promotion (CBHP) interventions are promising approaches to address public health problems; however, their economic evaluation presents unique challenges. This review aims to explore the opportunities and limitations of evaluating economic aspects of CBHP, focusing on the assessment of intervention costs and outcomes, and the consideration of political-level changes and health equity. A systematic search of the PubMed, Web of Science and PsycInfo databases identified 24 CBHP interventions, the majority of which targeted disadvantaged communities. Only five interventions included a detailed cost/resource assessment. Outcomes at the operational level were mainly quantitative, related to sociodemographics and environment or health status, while outcomes at the political level were often qualitative, related to public policy, capacity building or networks/collaboration. The study highlights the limitations of traditional health economic evaluation methods in capturing the complexity of CBHP interventions. It proposes the use of cost-consequence analysis (CCA) as a more comprehensive approach, offering a flexible and multifaceted assessment of costs and outcomes. However, challenges remain in the measurement and valuation of outcomes, equity considerations, intersectoral costs and attribution of effects. While CCA is a promising starting point, further research and methodological advancements are needed to refine its application and improve decision making in CBHP.

Suggested Citation

  • Philipp Weber & Leonie Birkholz & Riccarda Straub & Simone Kohler & Natalie Helsper & Lea Dippon & Klaus Pfeifer & Alfred Rütten & Jana Semrau, 2024. "The Limitations and Potentials of Evaluating Economic Aspects of Community-Based Health Promotion: A Critical Review," Applied Health Economics and Health Policy, Springer, vol. 22(2), pages 165-179, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:aphecp:v:22:y:2024:i:2:d:10.1007_s40258-023-00864-y
    DOI: 10.1007/s40258-023-00864-y
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40258-023-00864-y
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s40258-023-00864-y?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:aphecp:v:22:y:2024:i:2:d:10.1007_s40258-023-00864-y. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.