IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/annopr/v351y2025i3d10.1007_s10479-025-06654-0.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A decision support system for physician scheduling during a public health crisis: a mathematical programming model

Author

Listed:
  • Mohammad Saeed Heidary

    (Allameh Tabataba’I University)

  • Devika Kannan

    (University of Adelaide)

  • Saeid Dehghani

    (Sharif University of Technology)

  • Hassan Mina

    (Saito University College)

Abstract

With the occurrence of a public health crisis, the demand for healthcare services increases, which leads to an increase in the workload of hospitals. To overcome this predicament, hospitals should increase the number of their medical staff. Adding new medical staff, especially physicians, is a time-consuming process, and in such a situation, when the society is facing a shortage of physicians, it is almost impossible. Physician scheduling can be a practical solution to overcome this problem. Scheduling physicians without adding new physicians increases the workload of physicians, and this may affect their productivity and the service quality. To solve this problem, in addition to financial incentives, non-financial incentives such as increasing physicians' satisfaction should also be considered. Hence, by applying a novel mixed-integer linear programming (MILP) model, this study configures a decision support system for scheduling physicians by considering physicians' satisfaction during a public health crisis. The purpose of the proposed model is to maximize the fairness in the distribution of workload among physicians by considering their preferences. It should be noted that the satisfaction of physicians is considered using two indicators including equitable shifts distribution and physicians' preferences. The effectiveness of the proposed MILP model is examined using data from a hospital in Iran during the outbreak of the coronavirus disease (COVID-19). The investigated hospital consists of 15 regular departments that are served by 79 physicians. With the spread of COVID-19 pandemic, three departments are added to the existing departments to serve the COVID-19 patients. Finally, the proposed MILP model is implemented with and without considering physicians' preferences, and the effect of considering preferences on physician scheduling is shown.

Suggested Citation

  • Mohammad Saeed Heidary & Devika Kannan & Saeid Dehghani & Hassan Mina, 2025. "A decision support system for physician scheduling during a public health crisis: a mathematical programming model," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 351(3), pages 1831-1881, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:annopr:v:351:y:2025:i:3:d:10.1007_s10479-025-06654-0
    DOI: 10.1007/s10479-025-06654-0
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10479-025-06654-0
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10479-025-06654-0?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Farzad Zaerpour & Marco Bijvank & Huiyin Ouyang & Zhankun Sun, 2022. "Scheduling of Physicians with Time‐Varying Productivity Levels in Emergency Departments," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 31(2), pages 645-667, February.
    2. Damcı-Kurt, Pelin & Zhang, Minjiao & Marentay, Brian & Govind, Nirmal, 2019. "Improving physician schedules by leveraging equalization: Cases from hospitals in U.S," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 182-193.
    3. Renata Mansini & Roberto Zanotti, 2020. "Optimizing the physician scheduling problem in a large hospital ward," Journal of Scheduling, Springer, vol. 23(3), pages 337-361, June.
    4. Erhard, Melanie & Schoenfelder, Jan & Fügener, Andreas & Brunner, Jens O., 2018. "State of the art in physician scheduling," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 265(1), pages 1-18.
    5. Mohammad Tohidi & Masoumeh Kazemi Zanjani & Ivan Contreras, 2019. "Integrated physician and clinic scheduling in ambulatory polyclinics," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 70(2), pages 177-191, February.
    6. A Gunawan & H C Lau, 2013. "Master physician scheduling problem," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 64(3), pages 410-425, March.
    7. Fanny Camiat & Marìa I. Restrepo & Jean-Marc Chauny & Nadia Lahrichi & Louis-Martin Rousseau, 2021. "Productivity-driven physician scheduling in emergency departments," Health Systems, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 10(2), pages 104-117, April.
    8. Tohidi, Mohammad & Kazemi Zanjani, Masoumeh & Contreras, Ivan, 2021. "A physician planning framework for polyclinics under uncertainty," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 101(C).
    9. Kai Sun & Minghe Sun & Deepak Agrawal & Ronald Dravenstott & Frank Rosinia & Arkajyoti Roy, 2023. "Equitable anesthesiologist scheduling under demand uncertainty using multiobjective programming," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 32(11), pages 3699-3716, November.
    10. Sandeep Rath & Kumar Rajaram & Aman Mahajan, 2017. "Integrated Anesthesiologist and Room Scheduling for Surgeries: Methodology and Application," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 65(6), pages 1460-1478, December.
    11. Melissa R. Bowers & Charles E. Noon & Wei Wu & J. Kirk Bass, 2016. "Neonatal Physician Scheduling at the University of Tennessee Medical Center," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 46(2), pages 168-182, April.
    12. Zhang, Yu & Wang, Yu & Tang, Jiafu & Lim, Andrew, 2020. "Mitigating overtime risk in tactical surgical scheduling," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 93(C).
    13. Christopher N. Gross & Andreas Fügener & Jens O. Brunner, 2018. "Online rescheduling of physicians in hospitals," Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, Springer, vol. 30(1), pages 296-328, June.
    14. Toni I. Wickert & Alberto F. Kummer Neto & Márcio M. Boniatti & Luciana S. Buriol, 2021. "An integer programming approach for the physician rostering problem," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 302(2), pages 363-390, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wang, Fan & Zhang, Chao & Zhang, Hui & Xu, Liang, 2021. "Short-term physician rescheduling model with feature-driven demand for mental disorders outpatients," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 105(C).
    2. Shaowen Lan & Wenjuan Fan & Kaining Shao & Shanlin Yang & Panos M. Pardalos, 2022. "A column-generation-based approach for an integrated service planning and physician scheduling problem considering re-consultation," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 44(5), pages 3446-3476, December.
    3. Kraul, Sebastian & Erhard, Melanie & Brunner, Jens O., 2024. "Optimizing physician schedules with resilient break assignments," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 129(C).
    4. Yuli Wang & Wenjuan Fan & Shaowen Lan & Shuwan Zhu & Jianmei Du, 2025. "An integrated operating room and physician scheduling problem solved by a hybrid variable neighborhood search-based algorithm," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 50(1), pages 1-35, August.
    5. Paola Cappanera & Filippo Visintin & Roberta Rossi, 2022. "The emergency department physician rostering problem: obtaining equitable solutions via network optimization," Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, Springer, vol. 34(4), pages 916-959, December.
    6. Renata Mansini & Roberto Zanotti, 2020. "Optimizing the physician scheduling problem in a large hospital ward," Journal of Scheduling, Springer, vol. 23(3), pages 337-361, June.
    7. Tohidi, Mohammad & Kazemi Zanjani, Masoumeh & Contreras, Ivan, 2021. "A physician planning framework for polyclinics under uncertainty," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 101(C).
    8. Jonathan Patrick & Amine Montazeri & Wojtek Michalowski & Diponkar Banerjee, 2019. "Automated Pathologist Scheduling at The Ottawa Hospital," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 49(2), pages 93-103, March.
    9. Christopher N. Gross & Jens O. Brunner & Manfred Blobner, 2019. "Hospital physicians can’t get no long-term satisfaction – an indicator for fairness in preference fulfillment on duty schedules," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 22(4), pages 691-708, December.
    10. David Rea & Craig Froehle & Suzanne Masterson & Brian Stettler & Gregory Fermann & Arthur Pancioli, 2021. "Unequal but Fair: Incorporating Distributive Justice in Operational Allocation Models," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 30(7), pages 2304-2320, July.
    11. Lotfi Hidri & Achraf Gazdar & Mohammed M. Mabkhot, 2020. "Optimized Procedure to Schedule Physicians in an Intensive Care Unit: A Case Study," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(11), pages 1-24, November.
    12. Damcı-Kurt, Pelin & Zhang, Minjiao & Marentay, Brian & Govind, Nirmal, 2019. "Improving physician schedules by leveraging equalization: Cases from hospitals in U.S," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 182-193.
    13. Kai Sun & Minghe Sun & Deepak Agrawal & Ronald Dravenstott & Frank Rosinia & Arkajyoti Roy, 2023. "Equitable anesthesiologist scheduling under demand uncertainty using multiobjective programming," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 32(11), pages 3699-3716, November.
    14. Kraul, Sebastian & Brunner, Jens O., 2023. "Stable annual scheduling of medical residents using prioritized multiple training schedules to combat operational uncertainty," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 309(3), pages 1263-1278.
    15. Yu Wang & Yu Zhang & Minglong Zhou & Jiafu Tang, 2023. "Feature‐driven robust surgery scheduling," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 32(6), pages 1921-1938, June.
    16. Farzad Zaerpour & Marco Bijvank & Huiyin Ouyang & Zhankun Sun, 2022. "Scheduling of Physicians with Time‐Varying Productivity Levels in Emergency Departments," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 31(2), pages 645-667, February.
    17. Seokjun Youn & H. Neil Geismar & Michael Pinedo, 2022. "Planning and scheduling in healthcare for better care coordination: Current understanding, trending topics, and future opportunities," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 31(12), pages 4407-4423, December.
    18. Xu, Shuling & Hall, Nicholas G., 2021. "Fatigue, personnel scheduling and operations: Review and research opportunities," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 295(3), pages 807-822.
    19. Hainan Guo & Haobin Gu & Yu Zhou & Jiaxuan Peng, 2022. "A data-driven multi-fidelity simulation optimization for medical staff configuration at an emergency department in Hong Kong," Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, Springer, vol. 34(2), pages 238-262, June.
    20. Sean Harris & David Claudio, 2022. "Current Trends in Operating Room Scheduling 2015 to 2020: a Literature Review," SN Operations Research Forum, Springer, vol. 3(1), pages 1-42, March.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:annopr:v:351:y:2025:i:3:d:10.1007_s10479-025-06654-0. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.