IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/annopr/v251y2017i1d10.1007_s10479-015-1844-2.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A chance constrained recourse approach for the portfolio selection problem

Author

Listed:
  • Meryem Masmoudi

    (University of Bahrain)

  • Fouad Ben Abdelaziz

    (NEOMA Business School, Boulevard André Siegfried)

Abstract

This paper deals with the stochastic portfolio selection problem when the loss in the portfolio return is considered as a recourse cost. We suppose that the investor would penalize infeasible solutions for uncertain constraints with the most probable highest recourse cost rather than with the expected recourse cost as in the traditional recourse approach. This novel approach which is mixed with a goal programming approach is used to solve a multi-objective stochastic portfolio selection model. We illustrate the paper results by an empirical example using the weekly returns of the Standard & Poor’s 100 securities between January 2001 and November 2011.

Suggested Citation

  • Meryem Masmoudi & Fouad Ben Abdelaziz, 2017. "A chance constrained recourse approach for the portfolio selection problem," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 251(1), pages 243-254, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:annopr:v:251:y:2017:i:1:d:10.1007_s10479-015-1844-2
    DOI: 10.1007/s10479-015-1844-2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10479-015-1844-2
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10479-015-1844-2?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ralph Steuer & Yue Qi & Markus Hirschberger, 2007. "Suitable-portfolio investors, nondominated frontier sensitivity, and the effect of multiple objectives on standard portfolio selection," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 152(1), pages 297-317, July.
    2. A. Charnes & W. W. Cooper, 1963. "Deterministic Equivalents for Optimizing and Satisficing under Chance Constraints," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 11(1), pages 18-39, February.
    3. Abdelaziz, Fouad Ben & Aouni, Belaid & Fayedh, Rimeh El, 2007. "Multi-objective stochastic programming for portfolio selection," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 177(3), pages 1811-1823, March.
    4. Abdelaziz, Fouad Ben, 2012. "Solution approaches for the multiobjective stochastic programming," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 216(1), pages 1-16.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hanxiao Wang & Huizi Ma, 2022. "Optimal Investment Portfolios for Internet Money Funds Based on LSTM and La-VaR: Evidence from China," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(16), pages 1-18, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hatem Masri, 2017. "A multiple stochastic goal programming approach for the agent portfolio selection problem," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 251(1), pages 179-192, April.
    2. Junna Bi & Jun Cai & Yan Zeng, 2021. "Equilibrium reinsurance-investment strategies with partial information and common shock dependence," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 307(1), pages 1-24, December.
    3. Walter J. Gutjahr & Alois Pichler, 2016. "Stochastic multi-objective optimization: a survey on non-scalarizing methods," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 236(2), pages 475-499, January.
    4. Selçuklu, Saltuk Buğra & Coit, David W. & Felder, Frank A., 2020. "Pareto uncertainty index for evaluating and comparing solutions for stochastic multiple objective problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 284(2), pages 644-659.
    5. Engau, Alexander & Sigler, Devon, 2020. "Pareto solutions in multicriteria optimization under uncertainty," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 281(2), pages 357-368.
    6. Bilbao-Terol, Amelia & Arenas-Parra, Mar & Cañal-Fernández, Verónica, 2016. "A model based on Copula Theory for sustainable and social responsible investments," Revista de Contabilidad - Spanish Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 19(1), pages 55-76.
    7. Yue Qi & Ralph E. Steuer, 2020. "On the analytical derivation of efficient sets in quad-and-higher criterion portfolio selection," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 293(2), pages 521-538, October.
    8. Javier León & Justo Puerto & Begoña Vitoriano, 2020. "A Risk-Aversion Approach for the Multiobjective Stochastic Programming Problem," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(11), pages 1-26, November.
    9. Dorfleitner, Gregor & Utz, Sebastian, 2012. "Safety first portfolio choice based on financial and sustainability returns," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 221(1), pages 155-164.
    10. Utz, Sebastian & Wimmer, Maximilian & Hirschberger, Markus & Steuer, Ralph E., 2014. "Tri-criterion inverse portfolio optimization with application to socially responsible mutual funds," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 234(2), pages 491-498.
    11. Meryem Masmoudi & Fouad Ben Abdelaziz, 2018. "Portfolio selection problem: a review of deterministic and stochastic multiple objective programming models," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 267(1), pages 335-352, August.
    12. D. Pla-Santamaria & M. Bravo, 2013. "Portfolio optimization based on downside risk: a mean-semivariance efficient frontier from Dow Jones blue chips," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 205(1), pages 189-201, May.
    13. Ceren Tuncer Şakar & Murat Köksalan, 2013. "A stochastic programming approach to multicriteria portfolio optimization," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 57(2), pages 299-314, October.
    14. Walter Gutjahr & Alois Pichler, 2016. "Stochastic multi-objective optimization: a survey on non-scalarizing methods," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 236(2), pages 475-499, January.
    15. Sun, Wei & Huang, Guo H. & Lv, Ying & Li, Gongchen, 2013. "Inexact joint-probabilistic chance-constrained programming with left-hand-side randomness: An application to solid waste management," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 228(1), pages 217-225.
    16. Constantin Zopounidis & Michael Doumpos, 2013. "Multicriteria decision systems for financial problems," TOP: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 21(2), pages 241-261, July.
    17. Yue Qi & Ralph E. Steuer & Maximilian Wimmer, 2017. "An analytical derivation of the efficient surface in portfolio selection with three criteria," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 251(1), pages 161-177, April.
    18. Ballestero, Enrique & Bravo, Mila & Pérez-Gladish, Blanca & Arenas-Parra, Mar & Plà-Santamaria, David, 2012. "Socially Responsible Investment: A multicriteria approach to portfolio selection combining ethical and financial objectives," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 216(2), pages 487-494.
    19. Amelia Bilbao-Terol & Mar Arenas-Parra & Verónica Cañal-Fernández & Celia Bilbao-Terol, 2016. "Multi-criteria decision making for choosing socially responsible investment within a behavioral portfolio theory framework: a new way of investing into a crisis environment," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 247(2), pages 549-580, December.
    20. Avik Pradhan & M. P. Biswal, 2017. "Multi-choice probabilistic linear programming problem," OPSEARCH, Springer;Operational Research Society of India, vol. 54(1), pages 122-142, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:annopr:v:251:y:2017:i:1:d:10.1007_s10479-015-1844-2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.