IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/annopr/v244y2016i1d10.1007_s10479-016-2148-x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

NHPP-based change-point modeling for software reliability assessment and its application to software development management

Author

Listed:
  • Yuka Minamino
  • Shinji Inoue
  • Shigeru Yamada

Abstract

We often observe a phenomenon that the stochastic behavior of software failure-occurrence time-interval changes notably due to the change of the testing-environment during testing activities. Testing-time when such phenomenon is observed is called change-point. We discuss a framework for software reliability growth modeling with the change of the change-point for improving the accuracy of software reliability assessment based on software reliability growth models, and develop specific non-homogeneous Poisson process (NHPP) models based on our modeling framework based on typical NHPP models. Also, we investigate the usefulness of our proposed models by conducting goodness-of-fit comparisons with corresponding existing models by using actual data. Further, we discuss the optimal software release problems, which are interesting issues in software development management, based on our proposed models. Finally, we show numerical examples for software reliability assessment based on our models and the derived optimal policies by using actual data.

Suggested Citation

  • Yuka Minamino & Shinji Inoue & Shigeru Yamada, 2016. "NHPP-based change-point modeling for software reliability assessment and its application to software development management," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 244(1), pages 85-101, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:annopr:v:244:y:2016:i:1:d:10.1007_s10479-016-2148-x
    DOI: 10.1007/s10479-016-2148-x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10479-016-2148-x
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10479-016-2148-x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Can Huang & Luc Soete, 2008. "Policy forum," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 35(10), pages 771-781, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Subhashis Chatterjee & Ankur Shukla, 2017. "An Ideal Software Release Policy for an Improved Software Reliability Growth Model Incorporating Imperfect Debugging with Fault Removal Efficiency and Change Point," Asia-Pacific Journal of Operational Research (APJOR), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 34(03), pages 1-21, June.
    2. P. K. Kapur & Saurabh Panwar & Ompal Singh & Vivek Kumar, 2022. "Joint optimization of software time-to-market and testing duration using multi-attribute utility theory," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 312(1), pages 305-332, May.
    3. Triet Pham & Hoang Pham, 2019. "A generalized software reliability model with stochastic fault-detection rate," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 277(1), pages 83-93, June.
    4. Avinash K. Shrivastava & Vivek Kumar & P. K. Kapur & Ompal Singh, 2020. "Software release and testing stop time decision with change point," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 11(2), pages 196-207, July.
    5. Mengmeng Zhu, 2022. "A new framework of complex system reliability with imperfect maintenance policy," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 312(1), pages 553-579, May.
    6. Subhashis Chatterjee & Ankur Shukla & Hoang Pham, 2019. "Modeling and analysis of software fault detectability and removability with time variant fault exposure ratio, fault removal efficiency, and change point," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 233(2), pages 246-256, April.
    7. Avinash K. Shrivastava & Vivek Kumar & P. K. Kapur & Ompal Singh, 0. "Software release and testing stop time decision with change point," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 0, pages 1-12.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. S. Çetinkaya & Y. Zhang & E. Akçalı, 2017. "Vendor-buyer inventory problem revisited: modeling random yield and trade credit," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 68(10), pages 1265-1278, October.
    2. Kelle, Peter & Transchel, Sandra & Minner, Stefan, 2009. "Buyer-supplier cooperation and negotiation support with random yield consideration," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 118(1), pages 152-159, March.
    3. Chao-Hui Huang & Chun-Ho Wang, 2016. "Optimization of preventive maintenance for a multi-state degraded system by monitoring component performance," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 27(6), pages 1151-1170, December.
    4. Yanhong Tang & Yanling Ma & Christina W.Y. Wong & Xin Miao, 2018. "Evolution of Government Policies on Guiding Corporate Social Responsibility in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-20, March.
    5. Huang, Jikun & Chen, Ruijian & Qiao, Fangbin & Wu, Kongming, 2015. "Biosafety management and pesticide use in China's Bt cotton production," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 33(C), pages 67-75.
    6. Khan, M. & Jaber, M.Y. & Guiffrida, A.L. & Zolfaghari, S., 2011. "A review of the extensions of a modified EOQ model for imperfect quality items," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 132(1), pages 1-12, July.
    7. Shinji Inoue & Jun Ikeda & Shigeru Yamada, 2016. "Bivariate change-point modeling for software reliability assessment with uncertainty of testing-environment factor," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 244(1), pages 209-220, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:annopr:v:244:y:2016:i:1:d:10.1007_s10479-016-2148-x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.