IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/annopr/v203y2013i1p295-32310.1007-s10479-012-1167-5.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A GRASP for simultaneously assigning and sequencing product families on flexible assembly lines

Author

Listed:
  • Susan Heath
  • Jonathan Bard
  • Douglas Morrice

Abstract

This paper introduces a new model and solution methodology for a real-world production scheduling problem arising in the electronics industry. The production environment is a high volume, just-in-time, make-to-order facility with volatile demand over many product families that are assembled on flexible lines. A distinguishing characteristic of the problem is the presence of non-traditional sequence-dependant setup costs, which complicate our ability to find high-quality solutions. The scheduling problem arose when product variety exceeded the mix that the existing lines could accommodate. A nonlinear integer programming formulation is presented for the problem of minimizing setup costs, and a greedy randomized adaptive search procedure (GRASP) is developed to find solutions. To select the GRASP parameter values, an efficient, space-filling experimental design method is used based on nearly orthogonal Latin hypercubes. The proposed methodology is tested on actual factory data and compared to a prior heuristic presented in the literature; our heuristic provides a cost savings in 7 out of the 10 cases examined, and an average improvement of 17.39 % which is shown to be highly statistically significant. This improvement is due in part to the introduction of a pre-processing step to determine preferential and non-preferential line assignment information. Copyright Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2013

Suggested Citation

  • Susan Heath & Jonathan Bard & Douglas Morrice, 2013. "A GRASP for simultaneously assigning and sequencing product families on flexible assembly lines," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 203(1), pages 295-323, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:annopr:v:203:y:2013:i:1:p:295-323:10.1007/s10479-012-1167-5
    DOI: 10.1007/s10479-012-1167-5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/s10479-012-1167-5
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10479-012-1167-5?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mavridou, T. & Pardalos, P.M. & Pitsoulis, L.S. & Resende, Mauricio G.C., 1998. "A GRASP for the biquadratic assignment problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 105(3), pages 613-621, March.
    2. Kolisch, Rainer, 2001. "Make-to-order assembly management," Publications of Darmstadt Technical University, Institute for Business Studies (BWL) 14979, Darmstadt Technical University, Department of Business Administration, Economics and Law, Institute for Business Studies (BWL).
    3. Jose Pinto & Ignacio Grossmann, 1998. "Assignment and sequencing models for thescheduling of process systems," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 81(0), pages 433-466, June.
    4. Jennifer L. Loveland & Susan K. Monkman & Douglas J. Morrice, 2007. "Dell Uses a New Production-Scheduling Algorithm to Accommodate Increased Product Variety," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 37(3), pages 209-219, June.
    5. Allahverdi, Ali & Gupta, Jatinder N. D. & Aldowaisan, Tariq, 1999. "A review of scheduling research involving setup considerations," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 27(2), pages 219-239, April.
    6. Jack P. C. Kleijnen & Susan M. Sanchez & Thomas W. Lucas & Thomas M. Cioppa, 2005. "State-of-the-Art Review: A User’s Guide to the Brave New World of Designing Simulation Experiments," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 17(3), pages 263-289, August.
    7. Gilbert Laporte & Jorge Riera-Ledesma & Juan-José Salazar-González, 2003. "A Branch-and-Cut Algorithm for the Undirected Traveling Purchaser Problem," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 51(6), pages 940-951, December.
    8. Allahverdi, Ali & Ng, C.T. & Cheng, T.C.E. & Kovalyov, Mikhail Y., 2008. "A survey of scheduling problems with setup times or costs," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 187(3), pages 985-1032, June.
    9. Monkman, Susan K. & Morrice, Douglas J. & Bard, Jonathan F., 2008. "A production scheduling heuristic for an electronics manufacturer with sequence-dependent setup costs," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 187(3), pages 1100-1114, June.
    10. Thomas A. Feo & Jonathan F. Bard, 1989. "Flight Scheduling and Maintenance Base Planning," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 35(12), pages 1415-1432, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mehdi Rajabi Asadabadi, 2017. "A developed slope order index (SOI) for bottlenecks in projects and production lines," Computational Management Science, Springer, vol. 14(2), pages 281-291, April.
    2. Thiago Cantos Lopes & Celso Gustavo Stall Sikora & Adalberto Sato Michels & Leandro Magatão, 2020. "Mixed-model assembly lines balancing with given buffers and product sequence: model, formulation comparisons, and case study," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 286(1), pages 475-500, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Monkman, Susan K. & Morrice, Douglas J. & Bard, Jonathan F., 2008. "A production scheduling heuristic for an electronics manufacturer with sequence-dependent setup costs," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 187(3), pages 1100-1114, June.
    2. Allahverdi, Ali, 2015. "The third comprehensive survey on scheduling problems with setup times/costs," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 246(2), pages 345-378.
    3. Marko Ɖurasević & Domagoj Jakobović, 2019. "Creating dispatching rules by simple ensemble combination," Journal of Heuristics, Springer, vol. 25(6), pages 959-1013, December.
    4. Byung-Cheon Choi & Myoung-Ju Park, 2015. "A Batch Scheduling Problem with Two Agents," Asia-Pacific Journal of Operational Research (APJOR), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 32(06), pages 1-19, December.
    5. Löhndorf, Nils & Riel, Manuel & Minner, Stefan, 2014. "Simulation optimization for the stochastic economic lot scheduling problem with sequence-dependent setup times," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 170-176.
    6. Og[breve]uz, Ceyda & Sibel Salman, F. & Bilgintürk YalçIn, Zehra, 2010. "Order acceptance and scheduling decisions in make-to-order systems," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 125(1), pages 200-211, May.
    7. Hinder, Oliver & Mason, Andrew J., 2017. "A novel integer programing formulation for scheduling with family setup times on a single machine to minimize maximum lateness," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 262(2), pages 411-423.
    8. Dirk Briskorn & Konrad Stephan & Nils Boysen, 2022. "Minimizing the makespan on a single machine subject to modular setups," Journal of Scheduling, Springer, vol. 25(1), pages 125-137, February.
    9. Rauchecker, Gerhard & Schryen, Guido, 2019. "An exact branch-and-price algorithm for scheduling rescue units during disaster response," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 272(1), pages 352-363.
    10. Grundel, Soesja & Çiftçi, Barış & Borm, Peter & Hamers, Herbert, 2013. "Family sequencing and cooperation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 226(3), pages 414-424.
    11. Mohammad Reza Hosseinzadeh & Mehdi Heydari & Mohammad Mahdavi Mazdeh, 2022. "Mathematical modeling and two metaheuristic algorithms for integrated process planning and group scheduling with sequence-dependent setup time," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 22(5), pages 5055-5105, November.
    12. Fátima Pilar & Eliana Costa e Silva & Ana Borges, 2023. "Optimizing Vehicle Repairs Scheduling Using Mixed Integer Linear Programming: A Case Study in the Portuguese Automobile Sector," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-23, June.
    13. Mujawar, Sachin & Huang, Simin & Nagi, Rakesh, 2012. "Scheduling to minimize stringer utilization for continuous annealing operations," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 40(4), pages 437-444.
    14. Sheikh, Shaya & Komaki, G.M. & Kayvanfar, Vahid & Teymourian, Ehsan, 2019. "Multi-Stage assembly flow shop with setup time and release time," Operations Research Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 6(C).
    15. Philip Doganis & Haralambos Sarimveis, 2008. "Optimal production scheduling for the dairy industry," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 159(1), pages 315-331, March.
    16. Allahverdi, Ali & Aydilek, Harun, 2014. "Total completion time with makespan constraint in no-wait flowshops with setup times," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 238(3), pages 724-734.
    17. Soares, Leonardo Cabral R. & Carvalho, Marco Antonio M., 2020. "Biased random-key genetic algorithm for scheduling identical parallel machines with tooling constraints," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 285(3), pages 955-964.
    18. Xi, Yue & Jang, Jaejin, 2012. "Scheduling jobs on identical parallel machines with unequal future ready time and sequence dependent setup: An experimental study," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 137(1), pages 1-10.
    19. Hatami, Sara & Ruiz, Rubén & Andrés-Romano, Carlos, 2015. "Heuristics and metaheuristics for the distributed assembly permutation flowshop scheduling problem with sequence dependent setup times," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 76-88.
    20. S. M. Mousavi & I. Mahdavi & J. Rezaeian & M. Zandieh, 2018. "An efficient bi-objective algorithm to solve re-entrant hybrid flow shop scheduling with learning effect and setup times," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 18(1), pages 123-158, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:annopr:v:203:y:2013:i:1:p:295-323:10.1007/s10479-012-1167-5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.