IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/annopr/v201y2012i1p63-8110.1007-s10479-012-1231-1.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Computing bounds for the probability of the union of events by different methods

Author

Listed:
  • József Bukszár
  • Gergely Mádi-Nagy
  • Tamás Szántai

Abstract

Let A 1 ,…,A n be arbitrary events. The underlying problem is to give lower and upper bounds on the probability P(A 1 ∪⋯∪A n ) based on $P(A_{i_{1}}\cap\cdots\cap A_{i_{k}})$ , 1≤i 1 >⋯>i k ≤n, where k=1,…,d, and d≤n (usually d≪n) is a certain integer, called the order of the problem or the bound. Most bounding techniques fall in one of the following two main categories: those that use (hyper)graph structures and the ones based on binomial moment problems. In this paper we compare bounds from the two categories with each other, in particular the bounds yielded by univariate and multivariate moment problems are compared with Bukszár’s hypermultitree bounds. In the comparison we considered several numerical examples, most of which have important practical applications, e.g., the approximation of the values of multivariate cumulative distribution functions or the calculation of network reliability. We compare the bounds based on how close they are to the real value and the time required to compute them, however, the problems arising in the implementations of the methods as well as the limitations of the usability of the bounds are also illustrated. Copyright Springer Science+Business Media New York 2012

Suggested Citation

  • József Bukszár & Gergely Mádi-Nagy & Tamás Szántai, 2012. "Computing bounds for the probability of the union of events by different methods," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 201(1), pages 63-81, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:annopr:v:201:y:2012:i:1:p:63-81:10.1007/s10479-012-1231-1
    DOI: 10.1007/s10479-012-1231-1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/s10479-012-1231-1
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10479-012-1231-1?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ashraf Gouda & Tamás Szántai, 2010. "On numerical calculation of probabilities according to Dirichlet distribution," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 177(1), pages 185-200, June.
    2. Endre Boros & András Prékopa, 1989. "Closed Form Two-Sided Bounds for Probabilities that At Least r and Exactly r Out of n Events Occur," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 14(2), pages 317-342, May.
    3. Timothy M. Costigan, 1996. "Combination setwise‐Bonferroni‐type bounds," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 43(1), pages 59-77, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. René Henrion & Andris Möller, 2012. "A Gradient Formula for Linear Chance Constraints Under Gaussian Distribution," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 37(3), pages 475-488, August.
    2. Martin Bod’a, 2017. "Stochastic sensitivity analysis of concentration measures," Central European Journal of Operations Research, Springer;Slovak Society for Operations Research;Hungarian Operational Research Society;Czech Society for Operations Research;Österr. Gesellschaft für Operations Research (ÖGOR);Slovenian Society Informatika - Section for Operational Research;Croatian Operational Research Society, vol. 25(2), pages 441-471, June.
    3. Y-C Hsieh, 2003. "New reliability bounds for coherent systems," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 54(9), pages 995-1001, September.
    4. József Bukszár & András Prékopa, 2001. "Probability Bounds with Cherry Trees," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 26(1), pages 174-192, February.
    5. Talal Alharbi & Anh Ninh & Ersoy Subasi & Munevver Mine Subasi, 2022. "The value of shape constraints in discrete moment problems: a review and extension," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 318(1), pages 1-31, November.
    6. Andras Prekopa & Tam�s Sz�ntai, 2010. "On the analytical-numerical valuation of the Bermudan and American options," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 10(1), pages 59-74.
    7. Frolov, Andrei N., 2021. "On upper and lower bounds for probabilities of combinations of events," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).
    8. Garud Iyengar & Alfred Ka Chun Ma, 2010. "A robust optimization approach to pension fund management," Journal of Asset Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(2), pages 163-177, June.
    9. András Prékopa & Anh Ninh & Gabriela Alexe, 2016. "On the relationship between the discrete and continuous bounding moment problems and their numerical solutions," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 238(1), pages 521-575, March.
    10. Frolov, Andrei N., 2017. "On inequalities for values of first jumps of distribution functions and Hölder’s inequality," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 150-156.
    11. Serkan Eryilmaz & Cihangir Kan & Fatih Akici, 2009. "Consecutive k‐within‐m‐out‐of‐n:F system with exchangeable components," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 56(6), pages 503-510, September.
    12. Eryilmaz, Serkan & Unlu, Kamil Demirberk, 2023. "A new generalized δ-shock model and its application to 1-out-of-(m+1):G cold standby system," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 234(C).
    13. András Prékopa & Anh Ninh & Gabriela Alexe, 2016. "On the relationship between the discrete and continuous bounding moment problems and their numerical solutions," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 238(1), pages 521-575, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:annopr:v:201:y:2012:i:1:p:63-81:10.1007/s10479-012-1231-1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.