IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sgm/resrep/v2i29y2018p18-32.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Impact of Control Preferences Fit Between Employees and Their Supervisors on Employee Job Satisfaction (Znaczenie dopasowania preferencji kontroli pomiedzy podwladnym i przelozonym dla satysfakcji z pracy pracowników)

Author

Listed:
  • Anna Olga Kuzminska

    (Faculty of Management, University of Warsaw)

  • Daniel Pazura

    (Faculty of Management, University of Warsaw)

Abstract

Control preferences differentiate people with regard to their inclination towards a?? certain division of control in an interdependent situation. Social situations that block one’s capability to exert a preferred type of control can be evaluated as unpleasant and provoke their abandonment. We hypothesized that incompatibility of control preferences between leaders and followers would result in diminished job satisfaction among the followers. Such incompatibility could stem from either discrepancy between leader-follower control preferences (e.g. a discrepant preference for collaboration) or too great a??similarity (e.g. a similarly strong preference for domination). In our study, 203 participants rated their own control preferences and the perceived control preferences of their immediate supervisors. The results of polynomial regression with response surface analysis showed that job satisfaction was higher when a follower was aligned with a leader at a high level of collaboration preference rather than at a low level of collaboration preference. Contrary to our expectations, a similarity rather than a dissimilarity in dominance between employees and their leaders predicted higher job satisfaction among employees. Job satisfaction was higher when leaders were perceived as having greater respect for autonomy, regardless of the follower’s reactive autonomy. Finally, job satisfaction increased as both the follower’s proactive autonomy and the leader’s respect for autonomy increased.

Suggested Citation

  • Anna Olga Kuzminska & Daniel Pazura, 2018. "The Impact of Control Preferences Fit Between Employees and Their Supervisors on Employee Job Satisfaction (Znaczenie dopasowania preferencji kontroli pomiedzy podwladnym i przelozonym dla satysfakcji," Research Reports, University of Warsaw, Faculty of Management, vol. 2(29), pages 18-32.
  • Handle: RePEc:sgm:resrep:v:2:i:29:y:2018:p:18-32
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sim.wz.uw.edu.pl/sites/default/files/artykuly/sim_2018_2_2_a_kuzminska_d_pazura.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    person-supervisor fit; person-environment fit; control preferences; job satisfaction; supplementary fit; complementary fit;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • M12 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration - - - Personnel Management; Executives; Executive Compensation
    • O15 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Development - - - Economic Development: Human Resources; Human Development; Income Distribution; Migration
    • J24 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demand and Supply of Labor - - - Human Capital; Skills; Occupational Choice; Labor Productivity
    • J28 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demand and Supply of Labor - - - Safety; Job Satisfaction; Related Public Policy

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sgm:resrep:v:2:i:29:y:2018:p:18-32. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/somuwpl.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.