Author
Listed:
- Muke M Ferguson
(Glyndwr University, London, UK & Centre for Human Development Studies, UK:)
- Fletcher M Phiri
(Great Lakes Open University (Uganda) & Centre for Human Development Studies, UK)
Abstract
Background, aims & objectives: Attendance monitoring is very important in attaining students? academic engagement which in turn improves students? academic performance at university level. Visa tied students face different criteria in terms of attendance monitoring and the level of recorded study contact points or hours. One area of action research that such requirement raises is to investigate whether quantitative attendance translates into quantitative student outcomes in terms attempts to assignment or exam success at study-unit or module level and the final overall classification of academic-degree attained. Methodology: We use the case study approach, where we present a case study of an overseas student who presented with an excellent quantitative attendance record that had not translated into academic engagement or success. The aim is to determine whether and if so what intervention could bridge the gap between quantitative attendance and academic performance.Findings: For the case study subject we found that qualitative consultative management helped to resolve the observed disconnect between quantitative classroom attendance and quantitative student academic outcome. Conclusions and Implications: We conclude that monitoring quantitative engagement, in the form of quantitative class attendance, is singularly unlikely to be a useful tool that can be used to gauge students? academic engagement. For the case studies qualitative interaction with academic staff held the key to the student achieving the required academic engagement that produced noticeable quantitative academic outcomes.The insight gained from this case study may be of interest to institutions that especially serve overseas students who, by virtue of UKVI statutory requirements and institutional regulatory requirement are mandated to present with a minimum quantitative ?class? attendance record whence this does not necessarily translate to a similarly good quantitative academic outcome in terms of grade of degree and sometimes, time to completion of their studies.
Suggested Citation
Download full text from publisher
More about this item
Keywords
;
;
;
;
;
;
;
JEL classification:
- I29 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Education - - - Other
- I21 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Education - - - Analysis of Education
- I28 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Education - - - Government Policy
Statistics
Access and download statistics
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sek:jijote:v:4:y:2016:i:1:p:16-25. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Klara Cermakova (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://ijote.iises.net/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.