IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sdc/journl/v9y2022i4p6-13-27.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Discounting GDP for Pollution, Waste Generation and Natural Resources Depletion: A Comparative Analysis of selected High, Middle and Low income countries

Author

Listed:
  • Siba Sankar Mohanty
  • Himanshu Mallik

Abstract

GDP represents the money value of all final goods and services produced and traded within the domestic territory of a country in a given period of time. But it cannot reflect the economic loss of natural resources and the use of natural resources by people. It shows the size of the economy but ignores the environmental externalities and the cost of environmental depletion. This paper attempts to develop a new indicator, so called discounted GDP to quantify the cost of pollution, waste generation and natural resources depletion across high income, middle income and low-income countries with the help of a general calculation methodology (Stjepanovic, Tomic and Skare, 2017) by using secondary data collected from World Development Indicator (WDI) since, the year 2000. This paper also compares the discounted GDP with GDP between the countries like high income, middle income and low-income groups. A sample of 35 countries out of 193 member countries of UN is taken and divided it into three groups such as high, middle and low- income groups. The selection of countries is based on GDP, PPP (Constant International Dollar, 2017). 10 countries from high income groups, 16 countries from middle income groups and 9 countries from low-income groups are selected respectively. Our analysis viewed that there is a small gap between the discounted GDP and GDP in high income countries than the middle and low-income countries and also our results could serve to encourage further discussion and debates on green growth and environmental sustainability. This paper suggests that there is a need to bridge the gap of the lack of data availability and methodological improvements regarding the environmental aspects along with the economic growth.

Suggested Citation

  • Siba Sankar Mohanty & Himanshu Mallik, 2022. "Discounting GDP for Pollution, Waste Generation and Natural Resources Depletion: A Comparative Analysis of selected High, Middle and Low income countries," Journal of Studies in Dynamics and Change (JSDC), ISSN: 2348-7038, Voices of Inclusive Change and Expressions- (VOICE) Trust, Dehradun, Uttarakhand, vol. 9(4), pages 13-27, October-D.
  • Handle: RePEc:sdc:journl:v:9:y:2022:i:4:p:6-13-27
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://jsdconline.com/journal/jsdc/index.php/home/article/view/11/54
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://jsdconline.com/journal/jsdc/index.php/home/article/view/11
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mohammad Mahdi Rounaghi, 2019. "Economic analysis of using green accounting and environmental accounting to identify environmental costs and sustainability indicators," International Journal of Ethics and Systems, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 35(4), pages 504-512, September.
    2. SHAN, Changqing, 2016. "Green GDP Accounting in Yellow River Delta," Asian Agricultural Research, USA-China Science and Culture Media Corporation, vol. 8(09), pages 1-3, September.
    3. Himanshu Sekhar Rout, 2010. "Green Accounting: Issues and Challenges," The IUP Journal of Managerial Economics, IUP Publications, vol. 0(3), pages 46-60, August.
    4. Mahnaz Kalantaripor & Hamed Najafi Alamdarlo, 2021. "Spatial Effects of Energy Consumption and Green GDP in Regional Agreements," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-14, September.
    5. Boyd, James, 2007. "Nonmarket benefits of nature: What should be counted in green GDP?," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 61(4), pages 716-723, March.
    6. repec:eme:ijoes0:ijoes-03-2019-0056 is not listed on IDEAS
    7. Saša Stjepanović & Daniel Tomić & Marinko Škare, 2017. "A new approach to measuring green GDP: a cross-country analysis," Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 4(4), pages 574-590, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. H. Spencer Banzhaf & James Boyd, 2012. "The Architecture and Measurement of an Ecosystem Services Index," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 4(4), pages 1-32, March.
    2. Evans, Nicole M. & Carrozzino-Lyon, Amy L. & Galbraith, Betsy & Noordyk, Julia & Peroff, Deidre M. & Stoll, John & Thompson, Aaron & Winden, Matthew W. & Davis, Mark A., 2019. "Integrated ecosystem service assessment for landscape conservation design in the Green Bay watershed, Wisconsin," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 39(C).
    3. Małgorzata Porada Rochoń, 2021. "Convergence in Green Growth as the Key to Fighting Climate Change, 1990–2019," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-11, December.
    4. Bieling, Claudia & Plieninger, Tobias & Pirker, Heidemarie & Vogl, Christian R., 2014. "Linkages between landscapes and human well-being: An empirical exploration with short interviews," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 19-30.
    5. Meidijati Meidijati & Yvonne Augustine, 2022. "The Effect of Tax Accounting, Green Accounting, and Carbon Accounting on Environmental, Social, and Governance Performance: Moderated by Green Intellectual Capital," Technium Social Sciences Journal, Technium Science, vol. 31(1), pages 371-387, May.
    6. Jendrzejewski, Błażej, 2020. "Bioeconomic modelling – An application of environmentally adjusted economic accounts and the computable general equilibrium model," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    7. Posthumus, H. & Rouquette, J.R. & Morris, J. & Gowing, D.J.G. & Hess, T.M., 2010. "A framework for the assessment of ecosystem goods and services; a case study on lowland floodplains in England," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 69(7), pages 1510-1523, May.
    8. Lingyan Xu & Dandan Wang & Jianguo Du, 2022. "Spatial-Temporal Evolution and Influencing Factors of Urban Green and Smart Development Level in China: Evidence from 232 Prefecture-Level Cities," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(7), pages 1-19, March.
    9. Agus Joko Pramono & Suwarno & Firdaus Amyar & Renny Friska, 2023. "Sustainability Management Accounting in Achieving Sustainable Development Goals: The Role of Performance Auditing in the Manufacturing Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-13, June.
    10. Serhiy Lyeonov & Tetyana Pimonenko & Yuriy Bilan & Dalia Štreimikienė & Grzegorz Mentel, 2019. "Assessment of Green Investments’ Impact on Sustainable Development: Linking Gross Domestic Product Per Capita, Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Renewable Energy," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-12, October.
    11. Gao, Ming, 2023. "The impacts of carbon trading policy on China's low-carbon economy based on county-level perspectives," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 175(C).
    12. Irina GEORGESCU & Jani KINNUNEN & Armenia ANDRONICEANU & Ane-Mari ANDRONICEANU, 2020. "A Computational Approach to Economic Inequality, Happiness and Human Development," Informatica Economica, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 24(4), pages 16-28.
    13. Jiandong Chen & Ming Gao & Shulei Cheng & Yiyin Xu & Malin Song & Yu Liu & Wenxuan Hou & Shuhong Wang, 2022. "Evaluation and drivers of global low-carbon economies based on satellite data," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 9(1), pages 1-12, December.
    14. Lisna Lisnawati & Titik Aryati & Juniati Gunawan, 2024. "Implementation of digital innovation on sustainability performance: the moderating role of green accounting in the industrial sector," Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, PC TECHNOLOGY CENTER, vol. 1(13 (127)), pages 59-68, February.
    15. repec:thr:techub:10031:y:2022:i:1:p:371-387 is not listed on IDEAS
    16. Jean Bonnet & Eva Coll-Martinez & Patricia Renou-Maissant, 2019. "Sustainable development. A Comparative Analysis of the Performance of French departments," Economics Working Paper Archive (University of Rennes 1 & University of Caen) 2019-06, Center for Research in Economics and Management (CREM), University of Rennes 1, University of Caen and CNRS.
    17. Boyd, James, 2010. "Lost Ecosystem Goods and Services as a Measure of Marine Oil Pollution Damages," RFF Working Paper Series dp-10-31, Resources for the Future.
    18. Dong, Xiaobin & Ulgiati, Sergio & Yan, Maochao & Gao, Wangsheng, 2008. "Progress, influence and perspectives of emergy theories in China, in support of environmentally sound economic development and equitable trade," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(3), pages 1019-1028, March.
    19. José Roberto Kassai & Rafael Feltran-Barbieri & Luiz Nelson Carvalho & Yara Consuelo Cintra & Luís Eduardo Afonso & Alexandre Foschine, 2012. "The Environmental balance sheet of nations: reflections on global climate change scenarios," Brazilian Business Review, Fucape Business School, vol. 9(1), pages 60-102, January.
    20. Chien-Ming Lee & Hsuan-Hsuan Chou, 2018. "Green Growth In Taiwan — An Application Of The Oecd Green Growth Monitoring Indicators," The Singapore Economic Review (SER), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 63(02), pages 249-274, March.
    21. Khatun, Rahima & Reza, Mohammad Imam Hasan & Moniruzzaman, M. & Yaakob, Zahira, 2017. "Sustainable oil palm industry: The possibilities," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 608-619.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Discounting GDP; sustainable development; green growth;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • E01 - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics - - General - - - Measurement and Data on National Income and Product Accounts and Wealth; Environmental Accounts

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sdc:journl:v:9:y:2022:i:4:p:6-13-27. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sitesh Saran Nayak (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.