IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/scn/financ/y2015i5p116-126.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Совершенствование Налоговой Политики В Сфере Малого Предпринимательства И Обеспечения Экономического Роста (На Примере Армении) // Tax Policy Betterment In The Sphere Of Small Entrepreneurship And Economic Growth Ensuring (The Case Of Armenia)

Author

Listed:
  • G. Shmavonyan J.

    (the Armenian Social-Economic Policy Center, Yerevan)

  • Г. Шмавонян Д.

    (Армянский центр социально-экономической политики, Ереван)

Abstract

The article analyzes positive and negative trends in the RA small and medium-sized entrepreneurship (SME) development, SME role in economy of Armenia, Russia, Belarus and EU states, basic factors of economic growth deceleration. The purpose of research is to make an appraisal of Armenia’s SME modern state, suggest concrete tax mechanism for small business developent stimulation and economic growth acceleration. It is concluded that: 1) establishing preferential tax regime is substantiated: a) fi rstly just for small but not medium-sized business because of multiple exceeding of medium-sized business assets and eployees compared to identical indicators of small business; b) for attracting not simple foreign direct investments, but ones exactly from developed countries and states-RA strategic partners and being directed to the RA production sector; 2) currently the fundamental issue is to implement economic growth diversifi cation based on outrunning development of economic growth innovation component, diversifi cation of exports. The article propounds to implement tax policy radical liberalization, i.e. to form tax instruments for economic growth stimulation based on decrease of tax burden on businesses, tax exemption for some sectors and for defi nite period, particularly through accenting on tax preferences for insuring investment demand, economy innovative development, its diversifi cation and demonopolization. В статье проанализированы позитивные и негативные тренды в процессе развития малого и среднего предпринимательства в Республике Армения, роль этой сферы в экономике Армении, а также России, Беларуси, стран ЕС, основные факторы замедления экономического роста. Цель работы заключается в том, чтобы представить оценку современного состояния сферы малого бизнеса в республике, предложить конкретный налоговый механизм стимулирования развития малого бизнеса и обеспечения ускорения экономического роста. Сделан вывод о том, что: 1) обосновано установление преференциального режима налогообложения: а) в первоочередной мере именно для малого, а не среднего бизнеса, имея в виду многократное превышение (по законодательству Армении, России и других стран) численности работников и стоимости активов среднего бизнеса в сравнении с идентичными показателями малого бизнеса, б) для привлечения не вообще иностранных инвестиций, а инвестиций именно из развитых стран, стран — стратегических партнеров Армении, направляемых в производственную сферу республики; 2) ныне основополагающую значимость имеет диверсификация экономического роста на базе опережающего развития его инновационной составляющей, диверсификации экспорта. Предложено осуществить радикальную либерализацию налоговой политики, а именно создать налоговый инструментарий стимулирования экономического роста путем существенного снижения налоговой нагрузки на субъектов предпринимательства, а для отдельных секторов — освобождение от налогов на определенный период, в частности путем акцента на налоговые преференции по обеспечению инвестиционного спроса, инновационного развития экономики, ее диверсификации и демонополизации.

Suggested Citation

  • G. Shmavonyan J. & Г. Шмавонян Д., 2015. "Совершенствование Налоговой Политики В Сфере Малого Предпринимательства И Обеспечения Экономического Роста (На Примере Армении) // Tax Policy Betterment In The Sphere Of Small Entrepreneurship And Eco," Финансы: теория и практика/Finance: Theory and Practice // Finance: Theory and Practice, ФГОБУВО Финансовый университет при Правительстве Российской Федерации // Financial University under The Government of Russian Federation, issue 5, pages 116-126.
  • Handle: RePEc:scn:financ:y:2015:i:5:p:116-126
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://financetp.fa.ru/jour/article/viewFile/487/392.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Joseph E. Stiglitz, 1999. "More instruments and broader goals: moving toward the Post-Washington Consensus," Brazilian Journal of Political Economy, Center of Political Economy, vol. 19(1), pages 101-128.
    2. E. Yasin, 2001. "Economic Growth as an End and as a Means," Voprosy Ekonomiki, NP Voprosy Ekonomiki, vol. 9.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rajah Rasiah, 2005. "Trade-related Investment Liberalization under the WTO: The Malaysian Experience," Global Economic Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 34(4), pages 453-471.
    2. Roberto Martino & Phu Nguyen-Van, 2014. "Labour market regulation and fiscal parameters: A structural model for European regions," Working Papers of BETA 2014-19, Bureau d'Economie Théorique et Appliquée, UDS, Strasbourg.
    3. Alice N. Sindzingre, 2015. "Whatever Inconsistencies and Effects? Explaining the Resilience of the Policy Reforms Applied to Developing Countries," Forum for Social Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 44(2), pages 159-178, August.
    4. Fine, Ben, 2002. "Economics Imperialism and the New Development Economics as Kuhnian Paradigm Shift?," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 30(12), pages 2057-2070, December.
    5. Tóth, Balázs, 2021. "Milyen kapcsolatban állnak a közszféra reformjai a gazdaságpolitikai paradigmákkal? [How reforms of the public sector relate to the paradigms of economic policy]," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(2), pages 205-222.
    6. Andrés Rodríguez-Clare, 2005. "Coordination Failure, Clusters, and Microeconomic Interventions," Economía Journal, The Latin American and Caribbean Economic Association - LACEA, vol. 0(Fall 2005), pages 1-41, August.
    7. Philippe DULBECCO, 2000. "The Dynamics of the Institutional Change and the Market Economy: An Austrian Analysis," Working Papers 200010, CERDI.
    8. François Combarnous, 2003. "Le développement de l'humain comme préalable au développement économique : l'apport de l'analyse en composantes principales," Documents de travail 84, Groupe d'Economie du Développement de l'Université Montesquieu Bordeaux IV.
    9. Reinhardt, Nola & Peres, Wilson, 2000. "Latin America's New Economic Model: Micro Responses and Economic Restructuring," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 28(9), pages 1543-1566, September.
    10. Colin Crouch, 2007. "Neoinstitutionalism: Still no intellectual hegemony?," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 1(3), pages 261-270, September.
    11. Guanghua Wan & Ming Lu & Zhao Chen, 2004. "Globalization and Regional Income Inequality: Evidence from within China," WIDER Working Paper Series DP2004-10, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    12. Julia Cage, 2015. "Measuring Policy Performance: Can We Do Better than the World Bank?," Post-Print hal-03392964, HAL.
    13. Deepak Nayyar, 2006. "Development through Globalization?," WIDER Working Paper Series RP2006-29, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    14. Michal Lyons & Colman Titus Msoka, 2010. "The World Bank and the Street: (How) Do ‘Doing Business’ Reforms Affect Tanzania’s Micro-traders?," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 47(5), pages 1079-1097, May.
    15. Onye, Kenneth U., 2016. "Neoclassical Economics: The Need for a Reconstruction," MPRA Paper 88473, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    16. Rodrik, Dani, 2005. "Growth Strategies," Handbook of Economic Growth, in: Philippe Aghion & Steven Durlauf (ed.), Handbook of Economic Growth, edition 1, volume 1, chapter 14, pages 967-1014, Elsevier.
    17. Cimoli, Mario & Correa, Nelson & Katz, Jorge & Studart, Rogério, 2003. "Institutional requirements for market-led development in Latin America," Series Históricas 7792, Naciones Unidas Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL).
    18. Satish Mishra, 2002. "HISTORY IN THE MAKING - A systemic transition in Indonesia," Journal of the Asia Pacific Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 7(1), pages 1-19.
    19. Frederic Tournemaine & Christopher Tsoukis, 2010. "Status, Fertility, Growth And The Great Transition," The Singapore Economic Review (SER), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 55(03), pages 553-574.
    20. Hrushikesh Mallick & Mantu Kumar Mahalik & Hemachandra Padhan, 2020. "Does globalization exacerbate income inequality in two largest emerging economies? The role of FDI and remittances inflows," International Review of Economics, Springer;Happiness Economics and Interpersonal Relations (HEIRS), vol. 67(4), pages 443-480, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:scn:financ:y:2015:i:5:p:116-126. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Алексей Скалабан (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://financetp.fa.ru .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.