IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/
MyIDEAS: Login to save this article or follow this journal

The Political Debate about Savings Banks

  • Reinhard H. Schmidt

There have been lively political debates about savings banks as long as this type of financial institutions has existed. The focus of these debates have been two of the characteristic features of savings banks: They have always pursued financial as well as non-financial objectives, and until a few years ago and nowadays at least in some countries they are, in a specific sense, public banks. I review the debate about savings banks in two ways. First, I briefly discuss the conventional arguments and present three new arguments for having this type of financial institution. Second, i review the political debate as it has developed on the international level, on the level of the European Union and finally in Germany. I conclude that even though the political debates of the last two decades have led to rather critical assessments of savings banks, both the current financial crisis and recent academic research suggest that this critical position needs to be revised.

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL: http://www.vhb.de/sbr/pdfarchive.html
Download Restriction: no

Article provided by LMU Munich School of Management in its journal Schmalenbach Business Review.

Volume (Year): 61 (2009)
Issue (Month): 4 (October)
Pages: 366-392

as
in new window

Handle: RePEc:sbr:abstra:v:61:y:2009:i:4:p:366-392
Contact details of provider: Postal: Geschwister-Scholl-Platz 1, 80539 Muenchen
Phone: 0049 89 2180 2166
Fax: 0049 89 2180 6327
Web page: http://www.sbr-online.com

More information through EDIRC

No references listed on IDEAS
You can help add them by filling out this form.

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sbr:abstra:v:61:y:2009:i:4:p:366-392. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (sbr)

The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask sbr to update the entry or send us the correct address

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.