IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/woemps/v35y2021i2p396-405.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Profit over People? Evaluating Morality on the Front Line during the COVID-19 Crisis: A Front-Line Service Manager’s Confession and Regrets

Author

Listed:
  • Anastasios Hadjisolomou
  • Sam Simone

Abstract

This article gives voice to a front-line manager in food retailing, discussing her experiences during the COVID-19 outbreak which, overnight, became an ‘essential service’, leaving employees exposed to the virus. The article utilizes the ‘moral economy’ framework to understand how organizational policies, which were developed by senior management and implemented by front-line managers, denied human flourishing and well-being during a period of socio-economic crisis. The article captures the complexity of morality in organizations across managerial levels. Questioning the morality of managerial decisions during the pandemic and emphasizing how these are driven by the intense competition in the market, it reveals that front-line managers are caught between conflicting moral values and expectations. This study contributes to the ‘moral economy’ framework suggesting that the structural constraints of front-line managerial authority have challenged their moral values and narrowed the space for safe and meaningful work and well-being for front-line managers and employees.

Suggested Citation

  • Anastasios Hadjisolomou & Sam Simone, 2021. "Profit over People? Evaluating Morality on the Front Line during the COVID-19 Crisis: A Front-Line Service Manager’s Confession and Regrets," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 35(2), pages 396-405, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:woemps:v:35:y:2021:i:2:p:396-405
    DOI: 10.1177/0950017020971561
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0950017020971561
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0950017020971561?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sharon Bolton & Maeve Houlihan & Knut Laaser, 2012. "Contingent Work and Its Contradictions: Towards a Moral Economy Framework," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 111(1), pages 121-132, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Stéphanie Arnaud & David Wasieleski, 2014. "Corporate Humanistic Responsibility: Social Performance Through Managerial Discretion of the HRM," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 120(3), pages 313-334, March.
    2. Charles Umney, 2017. "Moral economy, intermediaries and intensified competition in the labour market for function musicians," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 31(5), pages 834-850, October.
    3. Ozlem Sandikci, 2021. "Religion and Everyday Consumption Ethics: A Moral Economy Approach," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 168(2), pages 277-293, January.
    4. Ana Alacovska & Joëlle Bissonnette, 2021. "Care-ful Work: An Ethics of Care Approach to Contingent Labour in the Creative Industries," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 169(1), pages 135-151, February.
    5. Emma Hughes & Tony Dobbins & Doris Merkl-Davies, 2022. "Moral economy, solidarity and labour process struggle in Irish public transport," Economic and Industrial Democracy, Department of Economic History, Uppsala University, Sweden, vol. 43(1), pages 146-167, February.
    6. Ernesto Noronha & Saikat Chakraborty & Premilla D’Cruz, 2020. "‘Doing Dignity Work’: Indian Security Guards’ Interface with Precariousness," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 162(3), pages 553-575, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:woemps:v:35:y:2021:i:2:p:396-405. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.britsoc.co.uk/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.